Post‑translational modification‑governed immune states in cancer immunity: Biomarker implications for checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and immunotherapy resistance (Review).

IF 7.3 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
International journal of oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-21 DOI:10.3892/ijo.2026.5932
Jinghao Pan, Boyang Li, Ruonan Lin, Chenlu Fang, Lucy Yue Lau, Zehao Hong, Yi Chen
{"title":"Post‑translational modification‑governed immune states in cancer immunity: Biomarker implications for checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and immunotherapy resistance (Review).","authors":"Jinghao Pan, Boyang Li, Ruonan Lin, Chenlu Fang, Lucy Yue Lau, Zehao Hong, Yi Chen","doi":"10.3892/ijo.2026.5932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune escape and therapeutic resistance remain major obstacles to durable benefit from cancer immunotherapy, yet transcript‑based or abundance‑based biomarkers often fail to capture the regulatory states that determine effective immune control. Post‑translational modifications (PTMs) form a dynamic protein‑state layer that rapidly reshapes protein stability, trafficking, complex assembly, and signaling persistence under tumor‑intrinsic and therapy‑imposed stress. In the present review, a biomarker‑oriented framework is proposed in which PTM biology is interpreted through three recurrent immune constraints: Checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and stress‑conditioned immune‑state programming. Within this framework, programmed death‑ligand 1 is viewed as a protein‑state biomarker problem rather than a static expression marker; tumor visibility is defined by durable antigen‑presentation competence and interferon‑linked reinforcement; and stress‑driven immune dysfunction is interpreted through metabolite‑sensitive PTM rewiring and chromatin‑coupled suppressive stabilization. Rather than cataloguing PTMs comprehensively in cancer immunity, the present review focuses on five core exemplar PTM axes, glycosylation, palmitoylation, ubiquitin editing, phosphorylation and lactylation, because they repeatedly map to rate‑limiting immune constraints, are supported by mechanistic evidence, and represent candidate assay‑compatible or intervention‑relevant state variables at differing levels of translational maturity. It is further outlined how integrated proteogenomic, immuno‑peptidomic, and spatial datasets can be used to discover candidate PTM‑state biomarkers, validate mechanism‑proximal readouts in prespecified pretreatment and on‑treatment settings, and prioritize single or co‑dominant state constraints for patient stratification, pharmacodynamic monitoring, and rational combination design. By organizing PTM biology around measurable state variables rather than modification class alone, the present review provides a phase‑aware translational framework for candidate biomarker discovery, fit‑for‑purpose validation, constraint‑guided stratification, and therapeutic prioritization in cancer immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14175,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oncology","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13553192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2026.5932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune escape and therapeutic resistance remain major obstacles to durable benefit from cancer immunotherapy, yet transcript‑based or abundance‑based biomarkers often fail to capture the regulatory states that determine effective immune control. Post‑translational modifications (PTMs) form a dynamic protein‑state layer that rapidly reshapes protein stability, trafficking, complex assembly, and signaling persistence under tumor‑intrinsic and therapy‑imposed stress. In the present review, a biomarker‑oriented framework is proposed in which PTM biology is interpreted through three recurrent immune constraints: Checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and stress‑conditioned immune‑state programming. Within this framework, programmed death‑ligand 1 is viewed as a protein‑state biomarker problem rather than a static expression marker; tumor visibility is defined by durable antigen‑presentation competence and interferon‑linked reinforcement; and stress‑driven immune dysfunction is interpreted through metabolite‑sensitive PTM rewiring and chromatin‑coupled suppressive stabilization. Rather than cataloguing PTMs comprehensively in cancer immunity, the present review focuses on five core exemplar PTM axes, glycosylation, palmitoylation, ubiquitin editing, phosphorylation and lactylation, because they repeatedly map to rate‑limiting immune constraints, are supported by mechanistic evidence, and represent candidate assay‑compatible or intervention‑relevant state variables at differing levels of translational maturity. It is further outlined how integrated proteogenomic, immuno‑peptidomic, and spatial datasets can be used to discover candidate PTM‑state biomarkers, validate mechanism‑proximal readouts in prespecified pretreatment and on‑treatment settings, and prioritize single or co‑dominant state constraints for patient stratification, pharmacodynamic monitoring, and rational combination design. By organizing PTM biology around measurable state variables rather than modification class alone, the present review provides a phase‑aware translational framework for candidate biomarker discovery, fit‑for‑purpose validation, constraint‑guided stratification, and therapeutic prioritization in cancer immunotherapy.

癌症免疫中翻译后修饰控制的免疫状态:生物标志物对检查点能力、肿瘤可见性和免疫治疗耐药性的影响(综述)
免疫逃逸和治疗耐药性仍然是癌症免疫治疗持久获益的主要障碍,然而基于转录本或基于丰度的生物标志物往往无法捕获决定有效免疫控制的调节状态。翻译后修饰(PTMs)形成一个动态的蛋白质状态层,在肿瘤固有和治疗施加的压力下迅速重塑蛋白质稳定性、运输、复杂组装和信号持久性。在本综述中,提出了一个以生物标志物为导向的框架,其中PTM生物学通过三个反复出现的免疫约束来解释:检查点能力,肿瘤可见性和应激条件免疫状态编程。在这一框架内,程序性死亡配体1被视为蛋白质状态生物标志物问题,而不是静态表达标志物;肿瘤可见性是由持久的抗原呈递能力和干扰素连接增强来定义的;压力驱动的免疫功能障碍可以通过代谢物敏感的PTM重新布线和染色质偶联抑制稳定来解释。本文并没有在癌症免疫中对PTM进行全面分类,而是将重点放在5个核心范例PTM轴上,即糖基化、棕榈酰化、泛素编辑、磷酸化和乳酸化,因为它们反复映射到限速的免疫约束,并得到机制证据的支持,并且代表了不同水平翻译成熟度的候选检测相容或干预相关状态变量。本文进一步概述了如何使用整合的蛋白质基因组学、免疫肽组学和空间数据集来发现候选的PTM状态生物标志物,在预先指定的预处理和治疗设置中验证机制近端读数,并优先考虑患者分层、药效学监测和合理组合设计的单一或共同主导状态约束。通过围绕可测量的状态变量组织PTM生物学,而不仅仅是修饰类,本综述为候选生物标志物的发现、适合目的的验证、约束引导的分层和癌症免疫治疗的治疗优先级提供了一个阶段感知的翻译框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: The main aim of Spandidos Publications is to facilitate scientific communication in a clear, concise and objective manner, while striving to provide prompt publication of original works of high quality. The journals largely concentrate on molecular and experimental medicine, oncology, clinical and experimental cancer treatment and biomedical research. All journals published by Spandidos Publications Ltd. maintain the highest standards of quality, and the members of their Editorial Boards are world-renowned scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书