{"title":"Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis in cancer screening programmes: the MOCCI method.","authors":"Bor Vratanar, Maja Pohar Perme","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyag167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer screening enables earlier cancer diagnosis and treatment. The interval between cancer diagnosis by screening and the symptomatic detection in the absence of screening is termed lead time. If a patient's tumour, detected by screening, would never surface clinically, the patient is considered overdiagnosed. Estimating these quantities is crucial for evaluating cancer screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Development: </strong>We developed MOCCI (Minimizing Observed and Counterfactual Cancer Incidence), a novel parametric method for estimating the lead time distribution. MOCCI compares age- and calendar-stratified cancer incidence between individuals invited to screening and those not invited and estimates the lead time distribution that minimizes the incidence difference between the two groups. The probability of overdiagnosis is then estimated by comparing the model-predicted lead time with the time to death from other causes.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>In an application to the Slovenian breast cancer screening programme, we estimated that 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 39%) of screen-detected cases were non-progressive and 33% (95% CI, 25% to 43%) were overdiagnosed; assuming an exponential lead time distribution for progressive cancers, the mean lead time was 1.8 years (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposes a new method for estimating lead time and overdiagnosis. The proposed method (a) can accommodate various lead time distributions, (b) yields a lead time distribution that is aligned with the observed excess incidence arising from screening, and (c) enables the separation of different sources of overdiagnosis. The method provides stable estimates when sample sizes are large and the assumed lead time model is simple.</p>","PeriodicalId":14147,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiology","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyag167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer screening enables earlier cancer diagnosis and treatment. The interval between cancer diagnosis by screening and the symptomatic detection in the absence of screening is termed lead time. If a patient's tumour, detected by screening, would never surface clinically, the patient is considered overdiagnosed. Estimating these quantities is crucial for evaluating cancer screening programmes.
Development: We developed MOCCI (Minimizing Observed and Counterfactual Cancer Incidence), a novel parametric method for estimating the lead time distribution. MOCCI compares age- and calendar-stratified cancer incidence between individuals invited to screening and those not invited and estimates the lead time distribution that minimizes the incidence difference between the two groups. The probability of overdiagnosis is then estimated by comparing the model-predicted lead time with the time to death from other causes.
Application: In an application to the Slovenian breast cancer screening programme, we estimated that 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 39%) of screen-detected cases were non-progressive and 33% (95% CI, 25% to 43%) were overdiagnosed; assuming an exponential lead time distribution for progressive cancers, the mean lead time was 1.8 years (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9).
Conclusions: This study proposes a new method for estimating lead time and overdiagnosis. The proposed method (a) can accommodate various lead time distributions, (b) yields a lead time distribution that is aligned with the observed excess incidence arising from screening, and (c) enables the separation of different sources of overdiagnosis. The method provides stable estimates when sample sizes are large and the assumed lead time model is simple.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Epidemiology is a vital resource for individuals seeking to stay updated on the latest advancements and emerging trends in the field of epidemiology worldwide.
The journal fosters communication among researchers, educators, and practitioners involved in the study, teaching, and application of epidemiology pertaining to both communicable and non-communicable diseases. It also includes research on health services and medical care.
Furthermore, the journal presents new methodologies in epidemiology and statistics, catering to professionals working in social and preventive medicine. Published six times a year, the International Journal of Epidemiology provides a comprehensive platform for the analysis of data.
Overall, this journal is an indispensable tool for staying informed and connected within the dynamic realm of epidemiology.