Clustering of rheumatoid arthritis patients: an unsupervised machine learning approach for characterizing the TNFi response.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pedro Augusto Silva Dos Santos Rodrigues, Katarina Mattos Brandão, Lilian de Sá Garcia Landeiro, Laryssa Cardoso Calmon, Almirane Lima de Oliveira, Thamara Barbosa Miranda, João Locke Ferreira de Araújo, Rafael Valente Veiga, Camila Alexandrina Viana de Figueiredo, Pablo de Moura Santos, Ryan Dos Santos Costa
{"title":"Clustering of rheumatoid arthritis patients: an unsupervised machine learning approach for characterizing the TNFi response.","authors":"Pedro Augusto Silva Dos Santos Rodrigues, Katarina Mattos Brandão, Lilian de Sá Garcia Landeiro, Laryssa Cardoso Calmon, Almirane Lima de Oliveira, Thamara Barbosa Miranda, João Locke Ferreira de Araújo, Rafael Valente Veiga, Camila Alexandrina Viana de Figueiredo, Pablo de Moura Santos, Ryan Dos Santos Costa","doi":"10.1007/s12026-026-09822-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identifydistinct profiles of response to Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using unsupervised machine learning to integrate clinical, demographic, and genetic data. A cohort of 294 RA patients was analyzed using hierarchical clustering techniques. Data collected included body mass index (BMI), adherence to physical activity, prevalence of comorbidities, seropositivity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and genetic polymorphisms in TNF pathway. Responders to TNFi demonstrated a more favorable clinical profile, with a lower BMI (25.6 vs. 27.0; p = 0.03), higher physical activity adherence (56.6% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.01), reduced prevalence of comorbidities (69.8% vs. 82.4%; p = 0.02), and improved functionality (HAQ: 0.8 vs. 1.7; p < 0.01) compared with non-responders. The C allele of rs767455 was significantly more frequent among responders (74.4% vs. 62.4%; p = 0.04). Clustering analysis identified three distinct subgroups: a better prognosis group characterized by a 73.5% response rate, minimal use of combination therapies, high adherence to physical activity, and male predominance; a poorer therapeutic response group with 82.9% therapeutic failure, intensive medication use, and low exercise adherence; and an intermediate group. TNFi response in RA is multifactorial. Integrating clinical, demographic, and genetic data enables the identification of distinct patient profiles, supporting the development of personalized treatment strategies and the advancement of precision medicine in RA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13389,"journal":{"name":"Immunologic Research","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13481759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunologic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-026-09822-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identifydistinct profiles of response to Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using unsupervised machine learning to integrate clinical, demographic, and genetic data. A cohort of 294 RA patients was analyzed using hierarchical clustering techniques. Data collected included body mass index (BMI), adherence to physical activity, prevalence of comorbidities, seropositivity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, and genetic polymorphisms in TNF pathway. Responders to TNFi demonstrated a more favorable clinical profile, with a lower BMI (25.6 vs. 27.0; p = 0.03), higher physical activity adherence (56.6% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.01), reduced prevalence of comorbidities (69.8% vs. 82.4%; p = 0.02), and improved functionality (HAQ: 0.8 vs. 1.7; p < 0.01) compared with non-responders. The C allele of rs767455 was significantly more frequent among responders (74.4% vs. 62.4%; p = 0.04). Clustering analysis identified three distinct subgroups: a better prognosis group characterized by a 73.5% response rate, minimal use of combination therapies, high adherence to physical activity, and male predominance; a poorer therapeutic response group with 82.9% therapeutic failure, intensive medication use, and low exercise adherence; and an intermediate group. TNFi response in RA is multifactorial. Integrating clinical, demographic, and genetic data enables the identification of distinct patient profiles, supporting the development of personalized treatment strategies and the advancement of precision medicine in RA management.

类风湿关节炎患者的聚类:表征TNFi反应的无监督机器学习方法。
本研究旨在利用无监督机器学习整合临床、人口统计学和遗传数据,确定类风湿关节炎(RA)患者对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的不同反应概况。采用分层聚类技术对294例RA患者进行队列分析。收集的数据包括身体质量指数(BMI)、坚持体育活动、合并症的患病率、血清阳性、健康评估问卷(HAQ)评分和TNF通路的遗传多态性。TNFi应答者表现出更有利的临床特征,BMI较低(25.6对27.0;p = 0.03),体育锻炼依从性较高(56.6%对33.3%;p = 0.03)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunologic Research
Immunologic Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH represents a unique medium for the presentation, interpretation, and clarification of complex scientific data. Information is presented in the form of interpretive synthesis reviews, original research articles, symposia, editorials, and theoretical essays. The scope of coverage extends to cellular immunology, immunogenetics, molecular and structural immunology, immunoregulation and autoimmunity, immunopathology, tumor immunology, host defense and microbial immunity, including viral immunology, immunohematology, mucosal immunity, complement, transplantation immunology, clinical immunology, neuroimmunology, immunoendocrinology, immunotoxicology, translational immunology, and history of immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书