Development and Reliability Testing of the Sinonasal Assessment of Reepithelialization, a Novel Wound Healing Scale to Assess Postoperative Healing.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rohan Bellary, Zakaria Dairi, Niraj Rama, Jennifer Kreinik, Thomas S Higgins, Taylor Carle, Arthur W Wu, Dilpreet Mann, Jennifer K Mulligan, Brian Lobo, Christopher Ito, Elisa A Illing, Satyan B Sreenath, Martin J Citardi, Christopher Roxbury, Raj Sindwani, Edward McCoul, Jeffrey Suh, Daniel Beswick, Philip G Chen, Dennis M Tang
{"title":"Development and Reliability Testing of the Sinonasal Assessment of Reepithelialization, a Novel Wound Healing Scale to Assess Postoperative Healing.","authors":"Rohan Bellary, Zakaria Dairi, Niraj Rama, Jennifer Kreinik, Thomas S Higgins, Taylor Carle, Arthur W Wu, Dilpreet Mann, Jennifer K Mulligan, Brian Lobo, Christopher Ito, Elisa A Illing, Satyan B Sreenath, Martin J Citardi, Christopher Roxbury, Raj Sindwani, Edward McCoul, Jeffrey Suh, Daniel Beswick, Philip G Chen, Dennis M Tang","doi":"10.1002/alr.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sinus and skull base surgery create areas of demucosalized bone and cartilage in the sinonasal cavity, yet no standardized system exists to describe the progressive healing of these wounds. The goal of this study was to develop the novel Sinonasal Assessment of Reepithelialization (SNARE) and perform parametric testing including inter-rater and intra-rater reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a modified Delphi method, an 11-member expert panel comprising 10 rhinologists and one PhD otolaryngology research scientist developed a four-stage wound healing scale over three iterative rounds, with consensus set at 80%. Consensus scale was as follows: Stage 0: Fully remucosalized; Stage 1: Mostly remucosalized; Stage 2: Extensive healing (granulation) tissue, minimal remucosalization; Stage 3: Minimal healing (granulation) tissue. Fifty-nine postoperative videos of nasoseptal flap (NSF) harvest sites were reviewed by 14 blinded, fellowship-trained rhinologists to assess inter-rater reliability-12 of whom repeated the evaluation after 1 month to assess intra-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater reliability for individual raters was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(A,1) = 0.763, Round 1; 0.761, Round 2). Intra-rater ICC(A,1) values ranged from 0.653 to 0.938 (mean = 0.83), indicating moderate reliability for one reviewer and good-to-excellent repeatability for the remainder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SNARE is a reliable, endoscopically based staging system with good-to-excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability for describing remucosalization of sinonasal wounds following sinus and skull base surgery. It provides a reliability-tested metric for future studies evaluating the effects of postoperative interventions on sinonasal wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sinus and skull base surgery create areas of demucosalized bone and cartilage in the sinonasal cavity, yet no standardized system exists to describe the progressive healing of these wounds. The goal of this study was to develop the novel Sinonasal Assessment of Reepithelialization (SNARE) and perform parametric testing including inter-rater and intra-rater reliability analyses.

Methods: Using a modified Delphi method, an 11-member expert panel comprising 10 rhinologists and one PhD otolaryngology research scientist developed a four-stage wound healing scale over three iterative rounds, with consensus set at 80%. Consensus scale was as follows: Stage 0: Fully remucosalized; Stage 1: Mostly remucosalized; Stage 2: Extensive healing (granulation) tissue, minimal remucosalization; Stage 3: Minimal healing (granulation) tissue. Fifty-nine postoperative videos of nasoseptal flap (NSF) harvest sites were reviewed by 14 blinded, fellowship-trained rhinologists to assess inter-rater reliability-12 of whom repeated the evaluation after 1 month to assess intra-rater reliability.

Results: Inter-rater reliability for individual raters was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(A,1) = 0.763, Round 1; 0.761, Round 2). Intra-rater ICC(A,1) values ranged from 0.653 to 0.938 (mean = 0.83), indicating moderate reliability for one reviewer and good-to-excellent repeatability for the remainder.

Conclusion: The SNARE is a reliable, endoscopically based staging system with good-to-excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability for describing remucosalization of sinonasal wounds following sinus and skull base surgery. It provides a reliability-tested metric for future studies evaluating the effects of postoperative interventions on sinonasal wound healing.

一种评估术后愈合的新型伤口愈合量表——鼻腔再上皮化评估的开发和可靠性测试。
背景:鼻窦和颅底手术在鼻腔中造成骨和软骨脱粘膜区,但没有标准化的系统来描述这些伤口的逐渐愈合。本研究的目的是开发新的鼻腔再上皮化评估(SNARE),并进行参数测试,包括评分者间和评分者内的信度分析。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法,由10名鼻内科医生和1名耳鼻喉科博士研究科学家组成的11名专家小组通过三轮迭代制定了四阶段伤口愈合量表,共识率为80%。共识量表如下:0期:完全再粘膜化;第一阶段:主要是再粘膜化;第二阶段:广泛愈合(肉芽)组织,最小的粘膜再化;阶段3:最小愈合(肉芽)组织。由14名接受过奖学金培训的盲法鼻内科医生回顾了59个鼻中隔皮瓣(NSF)收获部位的术后视频,以评估评分间的可靠性,其中12人在1个月后重复评估以评估评分内的可靠性。结果:个体评分者的评分间信度良好(类内相关系数(ICC)(A,1) = 0.763,第1轮;0.761, Round 2)。评分者内部ICC(A,1)值范围为0.653至0.938(平均值= 0.83),表明一名审稿人的信度中等,其余审稿人的可重复性良好至优异。结论:SNARE是一种可靠的、基于内窥镜的分期系统,在描述鼻窦和颅底手术后鼻窦伤口的再粘膜化方面具有良好到优异的内部和内部可靠性。它为未来的研究评估术后干预对鼻窦伤口愈合的影响提供了一个可靠的测试指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书