Tobias Veit, Stefan Trost, Teresa Kauke, Nina Engels, Gabriela Leuschner, Michael Gerckens, Carlo Mümmler, Sebastian Michel, Michael Zoller, Valeria Hackemann, Jürgen Behr, Nikolaus Kneidinger
{"title":"Maribavir in lung transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection: real-life experience.","authors":"Tobias Veit, Stefan Trost, Teresa Kauke, Nina Engels, Gabriela Leuschner, Michael Gerckens, Carlo Mümmler, Sebastian Michel, Michael Zoller, Valeria Hackemann, Jürgen Behr, Nikolaus Kneidinger","doi":"10.1007/s15010-026-02927-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cytomegalovirus remains a major challenge in LTx recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapy, refractory and resistant CMV infections persist, and real-world data on maribavir, a recently approved UL97 kinase inhibitor, are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 49 LTx recipients treated with maribavir for refractory and resistant (R/R) CMV between August 2022 and December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 34 patients (69.4%) achieved a sustained virological response, defined as complete CMV DNA clearance, with a > 1 log₁₀ viral load decline after a median of 11.5 days and complete viral clearance after a median of 24.8 [7-54] days. Sixteen patients (32.7%) failed therapy; UL97 resistance mutations were detected during maribavir therapy in 14 patients (28.6%). Non-responders had higher baseline viral loads (> 10,000 IU/ml: 53.3% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.047) and slower viral decline (14 (6-85) vs. 10.5 (2-27) days; p = 0.033). In multivariable analysis, higher baseline CMV viral load was independently associated with maribavir resistance (OR 3.729 per log₁₀ increase, 95% CI 1.360-10.226; p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, maribavir represents an important therapeutic option for R/R CMV after lung transplantation. However, treatment failure, relapse, and resistance remained common, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and further optimization of treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-026-02927-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cytomegalovirus remains a major challenge in LTx recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapy, refractory and resistant CMV infections persist, and real-world data on maribavir, a recently approved UL97 kinase inhibitor, are limited.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 LTx recipients treated with maribavir for refractory and resistant (R/R) CMV between August 2022 and December 2024.
Results: Overall, 34 patients (69.4%) achieved a sustained virological response, defined as complete CMV DNA clearance, with a > 1 log₁₀ viral load decline after a median of 11.5 days and complete viral clearance after a median of 24.8 [7-54] days. Sixteen patients (32.7%) failed therapy; UL97 resistance mutations were detected during maribavir therapy in 14 patients (28.6%). Non-responders had higher baseline viral loads (> 10,000 IU/ml: 53.3% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.047) and slower viral decline (14 (6-85) vs. 10.5 (2-27) days; p = 0.033). In multivariable analysis, higher baseline CMV viral load was independently associated with maribavir resistance (OR 3.729 per log₁₀ increase, 95% CI 1.360-10.226; p = 0.011).
Conclusion: In conclusion, maribavir represents an important therapeutic option for R/R CMV after lung transplantation. However, treatment failure, relapse, and resistance remained common, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and further optimization of treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.