Time-dependent analysis of HUS change in older patients aged > 75 years with head and neck cancer.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Danni Cheng, Katrina Hueniken, Andrew Hope, Shao Hui Huang, Anna Spreafico, David P Goldstein, Scott V Bratman, Yu Zhao, Jianjun Ren, John R de Almeida, Wei Xu, Geoffrey Liu
{"title":"Time-dependent analysis of HUS change in older patients aged > 75 years with head and neck cancer.","authors":"Danni Cheng, Katrina Hueniken, Andrew Hope, Shao Hui Huang, Anna Spreafico, David P Goldstein, Scott V Bratman, Yu Zhao, Jianjun Ren, John R de Almeida, Wei Xu, Geoffrey Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02551-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous longitudinal evidence has suggested that patients aged > 75 years may be associated with a poorer Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) trajectory. We compared the longitudinal health utility scores (HUS) of older (>75 years) versus younger patients with head and neck cancers across various clinical subgroups and identified factors associated with decline in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study prospectively collected clinical information and follow-up data from head and neck cancer patients. The HUI-3 scale was used to assess changes in health-related quality of life at baseline, post-surgery, mid-radiation therapy, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed model was employed to evaluate the changes in HUS and age categories over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 859 patients with head and neck cancer, of whom 647 were included in the longitudinal analytic cohort. In descriptive analyses, patients aged > 75 years showed less complete recovery in mean HUS after early treatment-related decline compared with younger patients. In the primary mixed-effects model, younger age groups had more positive average HUS slopes than patients aged > 75 years. However, these age-related differences were attenuated and were no longer statistically supported after adjustment for clinical stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and treatment modality. Subgroup findings were exploratory and were not consistently supported across all model-based comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients aged > 75 years may be at risk for slower or incomplete post-treatment recovery in HUI-3-derived health utility. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given potential selection bias, missing data, and attenuation after covariate adjustment. Larger studies with detailed geriatric and domain-specific functional measures are needed to confirm these patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13480271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02551-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous longitudinal evidence has suggested that patients aged > 75 years may be associated with a poorer Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) trajectory. We compared the longitudinal health utility scores (HUS) of older (>75 years) versus younger patients with head and neck cancers across various clinical subgroups and identified factors associated with decline in quality of life.

Methods: The study prospectively collected clinical information and follow-up data from head and neck cancer patients. The HUI-3 scale was used to assess changes in health-related quality of life at baseline, post-surgery, mid-radiation therapy, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed model was employed to evaluate the changes in HUS and age categories over time.

Results: We included 859 patients with head and neck cancer, of whom 647 were included in the longitudinal analytic cohort. In descriptive analyses, patients aged > 75 years showed less complete recovery in mean HUS after early treatment-related decline compared with younger patients. In the primary mixed-effects model, younger age groups had more positive average HUS slopes than patients aged > 75 years. However, these age-related differences were attenuated and were no longer statistically supported after adjustment for clinical stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and treatment modality. Subgroup findings were exploratory and were not consistently supported across all model-based comparisons.

Conclusion: Patients aged > 75 years may be at risk for slower or incomplete post-treatment recovery in HUI-3-derived health utility. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given potential selection bias, missing data, and attenuation after covariate adjustment. Larger studies with detailed geriatric and domain-specific functional measures are needed to confirm these patterns.

年龄在bb0 ~ 75岁的头颈癌老年患者溶血性尿毒综合征变化的时间依赖性分析。
背景:先前的纵向证据表明,bb0 - 75岁的患者可能与较差的健康效用指数标记3 (HUI-3)轨迹有关。我们比较了不同临床亚组中老年(75岁以上)和年轻头颈癌患者的纵向健康效用评分(HUS),并确定了与生活质量下降相关的因素。方法:前瞻性收集头颈癌患者的临床资料及随访资料。使用HUI-3量表评估基线、手术后、放射治疗中期以及3、6和12个月时健康相关生活质量的变化。采用线性混合模型评估溶血性尿毒综合征和年龄类别随时间的变化。结果:我们纳入了859例头颈癌患者,其中647例纳入了纵向分析队列。在描述性分析中,与年轻患者相比,年龄在50 ~ 75岁之间的患者在早期治疗相关衰退后,平均溶血性尿毒综合征的完全恢复程度较低。在初级混合效应模型中,较年轻年龄组的溶血性尿毒综合征平均斜率比bb0 - 75岁的患者阳性。然而,在调整临床分期、东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)的表现状态和治疗方式后,这些与年龄相关的差异减弱,不再有统计学支持。亚组研究结果是探索性的,并不是所有基于模型的比较都一致支持。结论:年龄在0 ~ 75岁之间的患者可能存在治疗后恢复缓慢或不完全的风险。考虑到潜在的选择偏差、数据缺失和协变量调整后的衰减,这些发现应谨慎解释。需要更大规模的研究,包括详细的老年和特定领域的功能测量来证实这些模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书