Community Street Play Versus Facility-based Screening for Mental Health Literacy in Rural India: A Mixed-methods Quasi-experimental Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Abhishek Ghosh, Pragyapti Malav, Blessy B George, Manya Shukla, Nagma Imam, Kashish Ranchan, Manju Mehra, Renjith R Pillai, Kshitiz Sharma, Shankar Prinja, Sandeep Bhola, Preet Mohan Singh, Alakjot Kaur, Debasish Basu, Neha Dahiya, Ashoo Grover
{"title":"Community Street Play Versus Facility-based Screening for Mental Health Literacy in Rural India: A Mixed-methods Quasi-experimental Study.","authors":"Abhishek Ghosh, Pragyapti Malav, Blessy B George, Manya Shukla, Nagma Imam, Kashish Ranchan, Manju Mehra, Renjith R Pillai, Kshitiz Sharma, Shankar Prinja, Sandeep Bhola, Preet Mohan Singh, Alakjot Kaur, Debasish Basu, Neha Dahiya, Ashoo Grover","doi":"10.1177/02537176261472529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-based approaches to mental health literacy (MHL), including street theatre, remain underrepresented. No study has compared street play with primary care facility-based screening as parallel MHL strategies. This study evaluated the effectiveness and acceptability of structured street play compared with facility-based screening in rural Punjab, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study with two non-randomized arms was conducted across ten primary care facilities in Mohali district. Adults in one block received a single 30-min street play (<i>N</i> = 102); those in the adjacent block underwent structured screening for depression, anxiety, and substance use by a non-specialist nurse using a validated mobile application (<i>N</i> = 100). Mental health knowledge schedule and attitudes to mental illness questionnaire were assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Acceptability was measured using the theoretical framework of acceptability scale. Twelve qualitative interviews guided by the health belief model (HBM) explored participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both arms showed significant improvements in knowledge (<i>F</i> = 9.788, <i>p</i> = .002) and attitudes (<i>F</i> = 4.841, <i>p</i> = .029) at follow-up, with no significant between-arm difference. A significant time × gender interaction (<i>F</i> = 12.262, <i>p</i> = .01) indicated that females who held more stigmatizing views at baseline showed greater attitudinal improvement than males. Post-intervention condition recognition was uniformly high, and acceptability exceeded 90%. Qualitatively, participants recognized susceptibility, severity, and benefits of help-seeking across all six HBM domains, with stigma, structural barriers, and increased self-efficacy reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single-session street play and facility-based screening produce comparable short-term improvements in MHL, supporting their integration as complementary demand-generation and case-identification strategies within the primary care mental health framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176261472529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13486401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176261472529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-based approaches to mental health literacy (MHL), including street theatre, remain underrepresented. No study has compared street play with primary care facility-based screening as parallel MHL strategies. This study evaluated the effectiveness and acceptability of structured street play compared with facility-based screening in rural Punjab, India.

Methods: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study with two non-randomized arms was conducted across ten primary care facilities in Mohali district. Adults in one block received a single 30-min street play (N = 102); those in the adjacent block underwent structured screening for depression, anxiety, and substance use by a non-specialist nurse using a validated mobile application (N = 100). Mental health knowledge schedule and attitudes to mental illness questionnaire were assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Acceptability was measured using the theoretical framework of acceptability scale. Twelve qualitative interviews guided by the health belief model (HBM) explored participants' experiences.

Results: Both arms showed significant improvements in knowledge (F = 9.788, p = .002) and attitudes (F = 4.841, p = .029) at follow-up, with no significant between-arm difference. A significant time × gender interaction (F = 12.262, p = .01) indicated that females who held more stigmatizing views at baseline showed greater attitudinal improvement than males. Post-intervention condition recognition was uniformly high, and acceptability exceeded 90%. Qualitatively, participants recognized susceptibility, severity, and benefits of help-seeking across all six HBM domains, with stigma, structural barriers, and increased self-efficacy reported.

Conclusions: A single-session street play and facility-based screening produce comparable short-term improvements in MHL, supporting their integration as complementary demand-generation and case-identification strategies within the primary care mental health framework.

印度农村社区街头游戏与基于设施的心理健康素养筛查:一项混合方法准实验研究。
背景:以社区为基础的精神卫生扫盲(MHL)方法,包括街头戏剧,仍然代表性不足。没有研究将街头游戏与基于初级保健设施的筛查作为平行的MHL策略进行比较。本研究评估了印度旁遮普农村有组织的街头游戏与基于设施的筛查的有效性和可接受性。方法:采用两组非随机分组的混合方法准实验研究,在Mohali地区的10家初级保健机构进行。一个街区的成年人接受一次30分钟的街头游戏(N = 102);邻近街区的患者接受了由非专业护士使用经过验证的移动应用程序进行的抑郁、焦虑和药物使用的结构化筛查(N = 100)。在基线和随访1个月时对心理健康知识表和心理疾病态度问卷进行评估。可接受度采用可接受度量表的理论框架进行测量。在健康信念模型(HBM)的指导下,进行了12次定性访谈,探讨了参与者的经历。结果:两组随访知识(F = 9.788, p = 0.002)和态度(F = 4.841, p = 0.029)均有显著改善,两组间差异无统计学意义。显著的时间与性别交互作用(F = 12.262, p = 0.01)表明,基线时持污名化观点较多的女性态度改善程度高于男性。干预后病情识别率一致较高,可接受度超过90%。定性上,参与者认识到所有六个HBM领域的易感性、严重性和寻求帮助的益处,其中包括耻辱、结构性障碍和自我效能感的增加。结论:单次街头游戏和基于设施的筛查对MHL产生了相当的短期改善,支持它们作为初级保健精神卫生框架内补充需求产生和病例识别策略的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书