Operationalising Inclusion for Participatory Design: Worked Examples for TRIPOD+AI & PROBAST+AI.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2026-08-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329261477136
Riley Martens, Linda Bakunda, Teresa Mushayandebvu, Zack Marshall
{"title":"Operationalising Inclusion for Participatory Design: Worked Examples for TRIPOD+AI & PROBAST+AI.","authors":"Riley Martens, Linda Bakunda, Teresa Mushayandebvu, Zack Marshall","doi":"10.1177/11786329261477136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly transforming the healthcare landscape, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalising treatments, and improving operational efficiency. However, alongside these advancements comes a critical concern: the potential for AI models to perpetuate, or even exacerbate, health inequities. This paper examines the complex potential of AI in health, and how it can both improve and undermine equity. The key to addressing these challenges lies not only in developing advanced algorithms but in fostering responsible and inclusive development. We argue that to operationalise inclusion in AI systems, research co-design should be prioritised in order to integrate the perspectives of diverse knowledge users, including patients, clinicians, and community partners, shown through worked examples in TRIPOD+AI and PROBAST+AI. This approach encourages future work to rethink the role of knowledge users in the development of AI for healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"19 ","pages":"11786329261477136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329261477136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly transforming the healthcare landscape, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalising treatments, and improving operational efficiency. However, alongside these advancements comes a critical concern: the potential for AI models to perpetuate, or even exacerbate, health inequities. This paper examines the complex potential of AI in health, and how it can both improve and undermine equity. The key to addressing these challenges lies not only in developing advanced algorithms but in fostering responsible and inclusive development. We argue that to operationalise inclusion in AI systems, research co-design should be prioritised in order to integrate the perspectives of diverse knowledge users, including patients, clinicians, and community partners, shown through worked examples in TRIPOD+AI and PROBAST+AI. This approach encourages future work to rethink the role of knowledge users in the development of AI for healthcare.

参与式设计的操作性包容:TRIPOD+AI和PROBAST+AI的工作实例。
人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)正在迅速改变医疗保健领域,提高诊断准确性、个性化治疗并提高运营效率。然而,伴随着这些进步而来的是一个关键问题:人工智能模型有可能延续甚至加剧卫生不平等。本文探讨了人工智能在健康领域的复杂潜力,以及它如何既能改善公平,又能破坏公平。应对这些挑战的关键不仅在于开发先进的算法,还在于促进负责任和包容性的发展。我们认为,为了在人工智能系统中实施包容性,应该优先考虑研究协同设计,以便整合不同知识用户的观点,包括患者、临床医生和社区合作伙伴,如TRIPOD+AI和PROBAST+AI中的工作示例所示。这种方法鼓励未来的工作重新思考知识用户在医疗保健人工智能发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书