Evaluation of surgical costs associated with isolated distal fibula fractures.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114261466669
Michael Amick, Tim Wardrop, Taylor Mendenhall, Chong Zhang, Angela P Presson, Devon Nixon
{"title":"Evaluation of surgical costs associated with isolated distal fibula fractures.","authors":"Michael Amick, Tim Wardrop, Taylor Mendenhall, Chong Zhang, Angela P Presson, Devon Nixon","doi":"10.1177/24730114261466669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operative fixation of distal fibula fractures is a common surgical procedure within orthopaedics. Understanding the variables that influence cost for surgical management of such injuries is increasingly important. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost differences in isolated distal fibula fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 394 patients were identified who underwent isolated distal fibula fracture fixation between 2018 and 2025 based on <i>Current Procedural Terminology</i> (<i>CPT</i>) coding (27792). Patient demographics, fixation strategy, implant type, and surgical setting were analyzed. Multivariable generalized linear models with inverse Gaussian distribution were used to estimate adjusted cost ratios. Cost data were obtained using the Value-Drive Outcomes (VDO) tool, an instrument at our institution that aggregates itemized costs for each surgical encounter. Costs are reported as relative cost ratios rather than raw dollar amounts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 394 surgeries, 244 were performed at a specialty surgery center (SSC) and 150 were completed at an academic medical center (AMC). Total direct costs were higher for fibula fracture surgery performed at an AMC vs an SSC, resulting in a 42% increase in total direct costs for AMC procedures (cost ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.32-1.52). Further, AMC facility costs were 84% higher than SSC (cost ratio 1.84; 95% CI 1.75-1.94), with the difference driven primarily by non-OR facility costs whereas OR facility costs were comparable between sites. Implant choice for fibula fixation did not appear to meaningfully influence cost. Surgeon specialty type did not differ in facility cost after controlling for surgery setting (facility cost ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.06; <i>P</i> = .97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distal fibular fracture fixation is significantly more costly when performed at an academic medical center than at a specialty surgery center, largely due to differences in non-OR facility costs. When medically appropriate, operative management of fibula fractures in an outpatient setting may lead to significant cost reductions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"11 3","pages":"24730114261466669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261466669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operative fixation of distal fibula fractures is a common surgical procedure within orthopaedics. Understanding the variables that influence cost for surgical management of such injuries is increasingly important. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost differences in isolated distal fibula fixation.

Methods: In total, 394 patients were identified who underwent isolated distal fibula fracture fixation between 2018 and 2025 based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding (27792). Patient demographics, fixation strategy, implant type, and surgical setting were analyzed. Multivariable generalized linear models with inverse Gaussian distribution were used to estimate adjusted cost ratios. Cost data were obtained using the Value-Drive Outcomes (VDO) tool, an instrument at our institution that aggregates itemized costs for each surgical encounter. Costs are reported as relative cost ratios rather than raw dollar amounts.

Results: Of the 394 surgeries, 244 were performed at a specialty surgery center (SSC) and 150 were completed at an academic medical center (AMC). Total direct costs were higher for fibula fracture surgery performed at an AMC vs an SSC, resulting in a 42% increase in total direct costs for AMC procedures (cost ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.32-1.52). Further, AMC facility costs were 84% higher than SSC (cost ratio 1.84; 95% CI 1.75-1.94), with the difference driven primarily by non-OR facility costs whereas OR facility costs were comparable between sites. Implant choice for fibula fixation did not appear to meaningfully influence cost. Surgeon specialty type did not differ in facility cost after controlling for surgery setting (facility cost ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.06; P = .97).

Conclusion: Distal fibular fracture fixation is significantly more costly when performed at an academic medical center than at a specialty surgery center, largely due to differences in non-OR facility costs. When medically appropriate, operative management of fibula fractures in an outpatient setting may lead to significant cost reductions.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

孤立性腓骨远端骨折手术费用的评估。
背景:腓骨远端骨折的手术固定是骨科中常见的手术方法。了解影响此类损伤手术治疗成本的变量变得越来越重要。在本研究中,我们旨在评估离体腓骨远端固定的成本差异。方法:根据现行程序术语(CPT)编码(27792),在2018年至2025年期间,共有394例患者接受了孤立的腓骨远端骨折固定。分析了患者人口统计学、固定策略、植入物类型和手术环境。采用反高斯分布的多变量广义线性模型估计调整后的成本比。成本数据是使用价值驱动结果(VDO)工具获得的,该工具是我们机构汇总每次手术的逐项成本的工具。成本以相对成本比率而不是原始美元金额报告。结果:394例手术中,244例在专科外科中心(SSC)完成,150例在学术医学中心(AMC)完成。与SSC相比,AMC进行腓骨骨折手术的总直接成本更高,导致AMC手术的总直接成本增加42%(成本比1.42,95% CI 1.32-1.52)。此外,AMC的设施成本比SSC高84%(成本比1.84;95% CI 1.75-1.94),差异主要是由非手术室设施成本驱动的,而手术室设施成本在不同地点之间是可比的。腓骨固定的植入物选择似乎对成本没有显著影响。控制手术环境后,外科医生专业类型在设备成本上没有差异(设备成本比1.00,95% CI 0.95-1.06; P = 0.97)。结论:在学术医疗中心进行腓骨远端骨折固定比在专业手术中心进行固定要昂贵得多,这主要是由于非手术室设施费用的差异。在医学上合适的情况下,在门诊进行腓骨骨折的手术治疗可能会显著降低成本。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书