{"title":"Development of a deep learning-based grid walking test for assessing post-stroke motor function in mice.","authors":"Monika Maciag, Vardan T Karamyan","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1873231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, affecting over 15 million people each year. Developing effective therapies depends on accurate, scalable methods to assess sensorimotor recovery in preclinical models. Standard motor tests like grid walking and ladder tests rely on manual scoring, limiting objectivity and throughput. To address this, we compared a commercially available automated ladder test with a newly developed deep learning-based grid walking test using DeepLabCut (DLC) in a photothrombotic stroke model in mice. Our results show that the automated ladder test system failed to detect significant unilateral deficits in stroke animals. It did not capture the expected increase in missteps in the affected forepaw after stroke, even though motor cortex infarcts were confirmed histologically, and the functional impairment was apparent with manual scoring in the grid walking test. In contrast, our DLC-based grid walking model provided fully automated quantification of this widely used test. It achieved millimeter-scale tracking accuracy and detected a ∼3-fold increase in foot faults in stroke-affected mice compared to controls, clearly differentiating between affected and unaffected forepaws for at least 2 weeks post-stroke. These findings expose the limitations of the commercial automated ladder test and demonstrate that the DLC-based pose-estimation-assisted misstep quantification in grid-walk test provides greater sensitivity for detecting motor deficit.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1873231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13478089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1873231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, affecting over 15 million people each year. Developing effective therapies depends on accurate, scalable methods to assess sensorimotor recovery in preclinical models. Standard motor tests like grid walking and ladder tests rely on manual scoring, limiting objectivity and throughput. To address this, we compared a commercially available automated ladder test with a newly developed deep learning-based grid walking test using DeepLabCut (DLC) in a photothrombotic stroke model in mice. Our results show that the automated ladder test system failed to detect significant unilateral deficits in stroke animals. It did not capture the expected increase in missteps in the affected forepaw after stroke, even though motor cortex infarcts were confirmed histologically, and the functional impairment was apparent with manual scoring in the grid walking test. In contrast, our DLC-based grid walking model provided fully automated quantification of this widely used test. It achieved millimeter-scale tracking accuracy and detected a ∼3-fold increase in foot faults in stroke-affected mice compared to controls, clearly differentiating between affected and unaffected forepaws for at least 2 weeks post-stroke. These findings expose the limitations of the commercial automated ladder test and demonstrate that the DLC-based pose-estimation-assisted misstep quantification in grid-walk test provides greater sensitivity for detecting motor deficit.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.