Does nasal airflow obstruction influence maxillary canine impaction? A fluid dynamics and quantitative tongue posture study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tomohiro Kizuki, Kei Maeo, Yukari Suzuki, Mayu Noda, Hitomi Kuramoto, Takamasa Kitamura, Yuki Akazawa, Hitomi Ishii, Ryuzo Kanomi, Tomonori Iwasaki
{"title":"Does nasal airflow obstruction influence maxillary canine impaction? A fluid dynamics and quantitative tongue posture study.","authors":"Tomohiro Kizuki, Kei Maeo, Yukari Suzuki, Mayu Noda, Hitomi Kuramoto, Takamasa Kitamura, Yuki Akazawa, Hitomi Ishii, Ryuzo Kanomi, Tomonori Iwasaki","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjag058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Maxillary buccal impacted canines (BIC) can cause root resorption of the adjacent incisors, making early detection critical. However, the etiological factors underlying BIC remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between nasal airflow status and tongue posture in patients with BIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three children with BIC were classified based on canine axis inclination into mild (n = 24, mean age: 9.24 years), moderate (n = 23, mean age: 9.12 years), and severe (n = 46, mean age: 9.67 years) impaction groups. A control group comprised 31 children without BIC (mean age: 9.66 years). Cone-beam computed tomography assessed maxillofacial morphology, maxillary and mandibular arch widths and molar inclination, intraoral airway volume (indicator of low tongue posture), and nasal airway pressure using computational fluid dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary first molar width was significantly smaller in the severe impaction group (32.4 mm) than in the control group (34.0 mm). Nasal airway pressure and intraoral airway volume were significantly greater in the severe impaction group (1328.2 Pa; 2.31 cm3) than in the control group (50.2 Pa; 0.53 cm3). Nasal airway obstruction and low tongue posture were significantly more prevalent in the severe impaction group (78.2% and 80.4%) than in the control group (9.6% and 22.5%).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study limitations include the retrospective nature, restricted sample age, and lack of evaluation of genetic and local factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>BIC are associated with dental arch morphology, nasal airway obstruction, and low tongue posture.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjag058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Maxillary buccal impacted canines (BIC) can cause root resorption of the adjacent incisors, making early detection critical. However, the etiological factors underlying BIC remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between nasal airflow status and tongue posture in patients with BIC.

Methods: Ninety-three children with BIC were classified based on canine axis inclination into mild (n = 24, mean age: 9.24 years), moderate (n = 23, mean age: 9.12 years), and severe (n = 46, mean age: 9.67 years) impaction groups. A control group comprised 31 children without BIC (mean age: 9.66 years). Cone-beam computed tomography assessed maxillofacial morphology, maxillary and mandibular arch widths and molar inclination, intraoral airway volume (indicator of low tongue posture), and nasal airway pressure using computational fluid dynamics.

Results: Maxillary first molar width was significantly smaller in the severe impaction group (32.4 mm) than in the control group (34.0 mm). Nasal airway pressure and intraoral airway volume were significantly greater in the severe impaction group (1328.2 Pa; 2.31 cm3) than in the control group (50.2 Pa; 0.53 cm3). Nasal airway obstruction and low tongue posture were significantly more prevalent in the severe impaction group (78.2% and 80.4%) than in the control group (9.6% and 22.5%).

Limitations: Study limitations include the retrospective nature, restricted sample age, and lack of evaluation of genetic and local factors.

Conclusions/implications: BIC are associated with dental arch morphology, nasal airway obstruction, and low tongue posture.

鼻腔气流阻塞是否影响上颌犬牙嵌塞?流体动力学和定量舌姿研究。
背景/目的:上颌颊阻生犬(BIC)可引起邻近门牙的牙根吸收,因此早期发现至关重要。然而,BIC的病因尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨BIC患者鼻气流状态与舌位的关系。方法:将93例BIC患儿根据犬轴倾斜度分为轻度(n = 24,平均年龄9.24岁)、中度(n = 23,平均年龄9.12岁)和重度(n = 46,平均年龄9.67岁)嵌套组。对照组为31例无BIC患儿(平均年龄9.66岁)。锥形束计算机断层扫描利用计算流体动力学评估颌面形态、上颌和下颌弓宽度和磨牙倾斜度、口内气道容积(低舌姿势的指标)和鼻气道压力。结果:重度嵌塞组上颌第一磨牙宽度(32.4 mm)明显小于对照组(34.0 mm)。重度嵌塞组鼻气道压力(1328.2 Pa; 2.31 cm3)显著高于对照组(50.2 Pa; 0.53 cm3)。重度嵌塞组鼻气道梗阻和低舌位的发生率分别为78.2%和80.4%,明显高于对照组(9.6%和22.5%)。局限性:研究的局限性包括回顾性、样本年龄受限、缺乏对遗传和局部因素的评估。结论/意义:BIC与牙弓形态、鼻气道阻塞和低舌位姿有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书