Influence of leaks and mask design on CO2 clearance during non-invasive ventilation: a combined bench and physiological study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nattapat Wongtirawit, Rosie Butterworth, Fernando Vieira, Annia Schreiber, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard
{"title":"Influence of leaks and mask design on CO<sub>2</sub> clearance during non-invasive ventilation: a combined bench and physiological study.","authors":"Nattapat Wongtirawit, Rosie Butterworth, Fernando Vieira, Annia Schreiber, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) interface can generate carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) rebreathing, potentially contributing to NIV failure. The impact of leaks and mask design remains unclear. This study evaluates how these factors influence CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing in oronasal face masks.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, participants: </strong>A bench study was followed by a physiological study. The bench study used a mannequin head connected to a breathing simulator exhaling CO<sub>2</sub>. Six oronasal face masks designed for single-limb circuits with varying exhalation port positions were tested with three levels of fit. A CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing index was calculated, along with intentional and unintentional leaks. The best-performing mask was then compared with two clinically used masks in healthy volunteers. Ventilatory ratio (VR, reflecting dead space) was derived from transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> (PtcCO<sub>2</sub>) and ventilation was assessed by electrical impedance tomography. Analyses used Friedman test and linear mixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bench study showed (1) mask design as a whole, rather than intentional leak flow rate, was the main determinant of CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing: exhalation ports situated on the mask body had lower CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing; (2) unintentional leaks decreased CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing only with poor mask design and (3) a new under-nose mask with nasal nozzles had the lowest CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing index. The latter was compared with two other masks in ten volunteers, median aged 32 (IQR 29-34): PtcCO<sub>2</sub> decreased from 37.3 (33.7-39.5) mm Hg at baseline to 32.5 (28.9-35.4) with the new mask (p=0.023). VR with the new mask (0.96 (0.93-1.12)) was lower than with the classical masks (1.40 (1.20-1.50) and 1.38 (1.19-1.45); p<0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mask design significantly influences CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing during NIV, with leaks' effects dependent on exhalation port position. A novel under-nose hybrid mask with embedded nozzles reduces CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing and dead space when compared with classical masks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03902639.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) interface can generate carbon dioxide (CO2) rebreathing, potentially contributing to NIV failure. The impact of leaks and mask design remains unclear. This study evaluates how these factors influence CO2 rebreathing in oronasal face masks.

Design, settings, participants: A bench study was followed by a physiological study. The bench study used a mannequin head connected to a breathing simulator exhaling CO2. Six oronasal face masks designed for single-limb circuits with varying exhalation port positions were tested with three levels of fit. A CO2 rebreathing index was calculated, along with intentional and unintentional leaks. The best-performing mask was then compared with two clinically used masks in healthy volunteers. Ventilatory ratio (VR, reflecting dead space) was derived from transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2) and ventilation was assessed by electrical impedance tomography. Analyses used Friedman test and linear mixed-effects model.

Results: The bench study showed (1) mask design as a whole, rather than intentional leak flow rate, was the main determinant of CO2 rebreathing: exhalation ports situated on the mask body had lower CO2 rebreathing; (2) unintentional leaks decreased CO2 rebreathing only with poor mask design and (3) a new under-nose mask with nasal nozzles had the lowest CO2 rebreathing index. The latter was compared with two other masks in ten volunteers, median aged 32 (IQR 29-34): PtcCO2 decreased from 37.3 (33.7-39.5) mm Hg at baseline to 32.5 (28.9-35.4) with the new mask (p=0.023). VR with the new mask (0.96 (0.93-1.12)) was lower than with the classical masks (1.40 (1.20-1.50) and 1.38 (1.19-1.45); p<0.001 for both).

Conclusions: Mask design significantly influences CO2 rebreathing during NIV, with leaks' effects dependent on exhalation port position. A novel under-nose hybrid mask with embedded nozzles reduces CO2 rebreathing and dead space when compared with classical masks.

Trial registration number: NCT03902639.

泄漏和面罩设计对无创通气期间CO2清除的影响:一项联合实验和生理研究。
背景:无创通气(NIV)界面会产生二氧化碳(CO2)再呼吸,可能导致无创通气(NIV)失效。泄漏和口罩设计的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了这些因素如何影响戴口鼻口罩时二氧化碳的再呼吸。设计,设置,参与者:一个实验研究之后是一个生理研究。这项实验使用了一个人体模型的头部与一个呼吸模拟器相连,并呼出二氧化碳。设计了六种用于单肢回路的口鼻口罩,具有不同的呼气口位置,并进行了三个水平的匹配测试。计算了二氧化碳再呼吸指数,以及有意和无意的泄漏。然后将表现最好的口罩与健康志愿者的两种临床使用的口罩进行比较。通气量比(VR,反映死区)由经皮CO2 (PtcCO2)得出,通气量通过电阻抗断层扫描评估。分析采用Friedman检验和线性混合效应模型。结果:台架研究表明:(1)面罩设计整体,而不是故意泄漏流量,是CO2再呼吸的主要决定因素:面罩体上的呼出气口具有较低的CO2再呼吸;(2)非故意泄漏降低了CO2再呼吸(3)新型带鼻口的鼻下面罩的CO2再呼吸指数最低。后一种口罩与另外两种口罩在10名志愿者中进行比较,中位年龄32岁(IQR 29-34): PtcCO2从基线时的37.3 (33.7-39.5)mmhg下降到新口罩时的32.5 (28.9-35.4)(p=0.023)。新型口罩的VR(0.96(0.93-1.12))低于传统口罩(1.40(1.20-1.50)和1.38 (1.19-1.45);结论:面罩设计对无创通气过程中的CO2再呼吸有显著影响,泄漏的影响取决于呼气口的位置。与传统的面罩相比,一种新型的带有嵌入式喷嘴的鼻下混合面罩减少了二氧化碳的再呼吸和死区。试验注册号:NCT03902639。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书