Toward accessible quantification of bone mineral density: feasibility of radiographic bone aluminum equivalence (RBAE) determined by digital radiography against DEXA and CT in translational sheep model.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Muhammad M Kamal, Ahmed I Abdelgalil, Elham A Hassan
{"title":"Toward accessible quantification of bone mineral density: feasibility of radiographic bone aluminum equivalence (RBAE) determined by digital radiography against DEXA and CT in translational sheep model.","authors":"Muhammad M Kamal, Ahmed I Abdelgalil, Elham A Hassan","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02675-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to explore an accessible quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) through Radiographic Bone Aluminium Equivalence (RBAE) as determined by Digital Radiography (DR), compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and computed tomography (CT) in ex vivo animal model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Metacarpal and metatarsal bones (n = 24) from skeletally mature sheep were imaged using standard DR, DEXA, and CT protocols. DR-derived BMD values were calculated from calibrated greyscale intensities using an aluminum step-wedge and image-analysis workflow. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the different modalities, whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess agreement between the measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DR-derived BMD as expressed as BRAE demonstrated strong linear correlation with DEXA (r = 0.779, p = 0.001) and moderate linear correlation with CT (r = 0.536, p = 0.04). Across all imaging modalities, metatarsal bones exhibited significantly higher BMD than metacarpal bones, with clear bilateral symmetry observed within each bone type. The consistency of results across modalities strengthens the validity of the findings and supports the reliability of each technique for detecting biologically meaningful differences in BMD. The agreement between DEXA, CT and digital radiography underscores the feasibility of using radiographic BMD to quantify BMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital radiography, supported by standardized calibration and analysis, yields a reproducible BMD estimates that align closely with DEXA and CT measurements. These findings highlight DR as a cost-effective and accessible option for BMD assessment, while providing valuable baseline insight into normal mineral distribution. This information supports future research on pathological bone loss, imaging validation, and therapeutic strategies to improve bone quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02675-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to explore an accessible quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) through Radiographic Bone Aluminium Equivalence (RBAE) as determined by Digital Radiography (DR), compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and computed tomography (CT) in ex vivo animal model.

Methods: Metacarpal and metatarsal bones (n = 24) from skeletally mature sheep were imaged using standard DR, DEXA, and CT protocols. DR-derived BMD values were calculated from calibrated greyscale intensities using an aluminum step-wedge and image-analysis workflow. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the different modalities, whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess agreement between the measurement methods.

Results: DR-derived BMD as expressed as BRAE demonstrated strong linear correlation with DEXA (r = 0.779, p = 0.001) and moderate linear correlation with CT (r = 0.536, p = 0.04). Across all imaging modalities, metatarsal bones exhibited significantly higher BMD than metacarpal bones, with clear bilateral symmetry observed within each bone type. The consistency of results across modalities strengthens the validity of the findings and supports the reliability of each technique for detecting biologically meaningful differences in BMD. The agreement between DEXA, CT and digital radiography underscores the feasibility of using radiographic BMD to quantify BMD.

Conclusion: Digital radiography, supported by standardized calibration and analysis, yields a reproducible BMD estimates that align closely with DEXA and CT measurements. These findings highlight DR as a cost-effective and accessible option for BMD assessment, while providing valuable baseline insight into normal mineral distribution. This information supports future research on pathological bone loss, imaging validation, and therapeutic strategies to improve bone quality.

迈向可获得的骨矿物质密度定量:通过数字x线摄影对DEXA和CT在平移羊模型中测定骨铝当量(RBAE)的可行性。
背景:本研究旨在探讨在离体动物模型中,与双能x线吸收仪(DEXA)和计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,通过数字x线摄影(DR)确定的x线骨铝当量(RBAE)来量化骨矿物质密度(BMD)的方法。方法:采用标准DR、DEXA和CT方法对骨骼成熟羊的掌骨和跖骨(n = 24)进行成像。dr衍生的BMD值是使用铝制阶梯楔和图像分析工作流程从校准的灰度强度计算出来的。相关分析和回归分析用于评估不同模式之间的关系,而类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析用于评估测量方法之间的一致性。结果:以BRAE表示的dr衍生BMD与DEXA呈强线性相关(r = 0.779, p = 0.001),与CT呈中度线性相关(r = 0.536, p = 0.04)。在所有成像模式中,跖骨的骨密度明显高于掌骨,每种骨类型都具有明显的双侧对称性。不同模式下结果的一致性加强了研究结果的有效性,并支持了检测骨密度生物学意义差异的每种技术的可靠性。DEXA、CT和数字x线摄影之间的一致性强调了使用x线摄影骨密度来量化骨密度的可行性。结论:在标准化校准和分析的支持下,数字x线摄影可以产生与DEXA和CT测量结果密切相关的可重复的骨密度估计。这些发现突出了DR作为BMD评估的成本效益和可获得的选择,同时提供了对正常矿物分布的有价值的基线见解。这一信息支持未来对病理性骨丢失、影像学验证和改善骨质量的治疗策略的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书