Small airway dysfunction and associated clinical characteristics in severe asthma under omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Muhammet Yıldırım, Bülent Akkurt, Zeynep Peker Koç, İlker Özdemir, Seçil Kepil Özdemir, Serir Özkan
{"title":"Small airway dysfunction and associated clinical characteristics in severe asthma under omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment.","authors":"Muhammet Yıldırım, Bülent Akkurt, Zeynep Peker Koç, İlker Özdemir, Seçil Kepil Özdemir, Serir Özkan","doi":"10.12932/AP-050426-2269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small airway dysfunction (SAD) plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of asthma.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of SAD in patients with severe asthma, and to assess its association with asthma control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 severe asthma patients were included in the study. Patients were classified into phenotypes according to the presence of allergy, fungal sensitization, obesity, blood eosinophil counts and frequency of asthma exacerbations. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry were performed for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients (83.1%) had allergic, 75 (91.5%) eosinophilic, 43 (51.2%) obese asthma, 25 (31.6%) asthma with fungal sensitization, and 24 (28.6%) were frequent-exacerbators. The detection rates of SAD by IOS and spirometry in the overall group, allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, obese asthma, asthma with frequent-exacerbations and asthma with fungal sensitization groups were as follows, respectively: 85.7% and 84.0%; 87.0% and 86.4%; 89.3% and 86.1%; 86.0% and 82.5%; 87.5% and 85.7%; 92.0% and 87.0%. The rate of SAD detected by IOS was significantly higher in the eosinophilic group compared with the non-eosinophilic group (89.3% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.047). SAD was detected in 92.5% of patients with controlled and 100% of those with uncontrolled asthma (p = 0.292). Area of reactance (AX) and resonant frequency (Fres ) were lower in the controlled group (p = 0.044, 0.005, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The frequency of SAD is significantly higher in eosinophilic asthma compared with non-eosinophilic asthma, while similar across allergic, obese, fungal sensitization and frequent-exacerbator phenotypes. Higher AX and Fres values may be potentially indicative of uncontrolled asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-050426-2269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small airway dysfunction (SAD) plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of asthma.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of SAD in patients with severe asthma, and to assess its association with asthma control.

Methods: A total of 84 severe asthma patients were included in the study. Patients were classified into phenotypes according to the presence of allergy, fungal sensitization, obesity, blood eosinophil counts and frequency of asthma exacerbations. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry were performed for all patients.

Results: Sixty-nine patients (83.1%) had allergic, 75 (91.5%) eosinophilic, 43 (51.2%) obese asthma, 25 (31.6%) asthma with fungal sensitization, and 24 (28.6%) were frequent-exacerbators. The detection rates of SAD by IOS and spirometry in the overall group, allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, obese asthma, asthma with frequent-exacerbations and asthma with fungal sensitization groups were as follows, respectively: 85.7% and 84.0%; 87.0% and 86.4%; 89.3% and 86.1%; 86.0% and 82.5%; 87.5% and 85.7%; 92.0% and 87.0%. The rate of SAD detected by IOS was significantly higher in the eosinophilic group compared with the non-eosinophilic group (89.3% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.047). SAD was detected in 92.5% of patients with controlled and 100% of those with uncontrolled asthma (p = 0.292). Area of reactance (AX) and resonant frequency (Fres ) were lower in the controlled group (p = 0.044, 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions: The frequency of SAD is significantly higher in eosinophilic asthma compared with non-eosinophilic asthma, while similar across allergic, obese, fungal sensitization and frequent-exacerbator phenotypes. Higher AX and Fres values may be potentially indicative of uncontrolled asthma.

奥玛珠单抗和美波珠单抗治疗下严重哮喘小气道功能障碍及相关临床特征
背景:小气道功能障碍(SAD)在哮喘的病理生理中起着关键作用。目的:本研究旨在评估重度哮喘患者发生SAD的频率,并评估其与哮喘控制的关系。方法:选取84例重症哮喘患者作为研究对象。根据过敏、真菌致敏、肥胖、血嗜酸性粒细胞计数和哮喘发作频率将患者分为不同的表型。所有患者均行脉搏振荡测定法(IOS)和肺活量测定法。结果:过敏性哮喘69例(83.1%),嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘75例(91.5%),肥胖哮喘43例(51.2%),真菌致敏哮喘25例(31.6%),频繁加重者24例(28.6%)。整体组、变应性哮喘组、嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘组、肥胖哮喘组、频繁发作哮喘组和真菌致敏哮喘组SAD的检出率分别为85.7%和84.0%;87.0%和86.4%;89.3%和86.1%;86.0%和82.5%;87.5%和85.7%;92.0%和87.0%。IOS检测嗜酸性粒细胞组SAD的检出率显著高于非嗜酸性粒细胞组(89.3% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.047)。哮喘控制组和非控制组分别有92.5%和100%的患者出现SAD (p = 0.292)。对照组的电抗面积(AX)和谐振频率(Fres)较对照组低(p分别为0.044、0.005)。结论:与非嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘相比,嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘中SAD的频率显著高于非嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘,而在过敏、肥胖、真菌致敏和频繁加重因子表型中相似。较高的AX和Fres值可能潜在地指示哮喘不受控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书