Automated Post-Analytical Workflow for Newborn Screening Using a Hybrid Rule-Based and Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model System.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Se-Eun Koo, Soo-Ho Yu, Hyun-Woo Lee, Gyujin Lim, Hyung-Doo Park, Soo-Youn Lee
{"title":"Automated Post-Analytical Workflow for Newborn Screening Using a Hybrid Rule-Based and Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model System.","authors":"Se-Eun Koo, Soo-Ho Yu, Hyun-Woo Lee, Gyujin Lim, Hyung-Doo Park, Soo-Youn Lee","doi":"10.3343/alm.2026.0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn screening using tandem mass spectrometry requires complex post-analytical workflows, including QC review, patient report generation, and cutoff reassessment, which are repetitive, time-consuming, and error-prone. We developed a Python-based clinical decision support system with a graphical user interface, integrating four functionalities: QC and patient result evaluation with deterministic flagging, report drafting using hybrid rule-based and retrieval-augmented generation-enabled large language models, cutoff analysis, and a source-attributed reference chatbot. All artificial intelligence (AI)-generated outputs required mandatory specialist review before release. Implementation reduced the mean per-batch post-analytical processing time from 50.5±14.8 min to 24.3±8.8 min and the cutoff evaluation time from 9.2±1.9 hr to 63.6±13.6 min. Across 20 synthetic cases representing 10 disorders, five specialists identified no major errors affecting clinical interpretation. Repeated generation from identical inputs (50 drafts) produced stable diagnostic conclusions, and all source-attributed statements cited correct sources, with 56 of 60 fully covered by the cited excerpt. Deterministic QC flagging, patient result flagging, and cutoff calculations were fully concordant with manual review. This human-in-the-loop system demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of controlled AI integration into clinical laboratory workflows, whereas diagnostic performance requires further validation using confirmed-positive specimens and human-comparator benchmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2026.0262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Newborn screening using tandem mass spectrometry requires complex post-analytical workflows, including QC review, patient report generation, and cutoff reassessment, which are repetitive, time-consuming, and error-prone. We developed a Python-based clinical decision support system with a graphical user interface, integrating four functionalities: QC and patient result evaluation with deterministic flagging, report drafting using hybrid rule-based and retrieval-augmented generation-enabled large language models, cutoff analysis, and a source-attributed reference chatbot. All artificial intelligence (AI)-generated outputs required mandatory specialist review before release. Implementation reduced the mean per-batch post-analytical processing time from 50.5±14.8 min to 24.3±8.8 min and the cutoff evaluation time from 9.2±1.9 hr to 63.6±13.6 min. Across 20 synthetic cases representing 10 disorders, five specialists identified no major errors affecting clinical interpretation. Repeated generation from identical inputs (50 drafts) produced stable diagnostic conclusions, and all source-attributed statements cited correct sources, with 56 of 60 fully covered by the cited excerpt. Deterministic QC flagging, patient result flagging, and cutoff calculations were fully concordant with manual review. This human-in-the-loop system demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of controlled AI integration into clinical laboratory workflows, whereas diagnostic performance requires further validation using confirmed-positive specimens and human-comparator benchmarks.

使用基于规则和检索增强的混合大语言模型系统的新生儿筛选自动分析后工作流程。
使用串联质谱进行新生儿筛查需要复杂的分析后工作流程,包括QC审查、患者报告生成和截止时间重新评估,这些工作重复、耗时且容易出错。我们开发了一个基于python的临床决策支持系统,该系统具有图形用户界面,集成了四种功能:带有确定性标记的QC和患者结果评估,使用混合规则和检索增强生成的大型语言模型的报告起草,截止分析和源属性参考聊天机器人。所有人工智能(AI)生成的输出在发布前都需要强制性的专家审查。实施后,平均每批分析后处理时间从50.5±14.8分钟减少到24.3±8.8分钟,截止评估时间从9.2±1.9小时减少到63.6±13.6分钟。在代表10种疾病的20例合成病例中,5名专家发现没有影响临床解释的重大错误。从相同的输入(50份草稿)中重复生成,产生了稳定的诊断结论,并且所有来源归因于的陈述都引用了正确的来源,其中60份中有56份被引用的摘录完全覆盖。确定性QC标记,患者结果标记和截止计算与人工审查完全一致。这种人在循环系统证明了将受控人工智能集成到临床实验室工作流程中的可行性和效率,而诊断性能需要使用确认阳性标本和人体比较器基准进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书