Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Non-Contrast Brain Computed Tomography Scan for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.8 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2997
Hamed Ghorani, Seyedeh Toktam Masoumian Hosseini, Matin Noroozi, Mohammad Hossein Imani, Iman Kiani, Nastaran Sadat Mahdavi, Soleiman Ahmady
{"title":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Non-Contrast Brain Computed Tomography Scan for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Hamed Ghorani, Seyedeh Toktam Masoumian Hosseini, Matin Noroozi, Mohammad Hossein Imani, Iman Kiani, Nastaran Sadat Mahdavi, Soleiman Ahmady","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) scan have demonstrated promising performance in hematoma detection, segmentation, and outcome prediction. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been proposed as a strategy to improve transparency and facilitate clinical integration. This study aimed to map and summarize XAI methods used in CT scan-based studies of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and to assess their validation approaches, transparency, and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/5kxbt). In this review, original studies of adult and pediatric patients with spontaneous ICH that used AI or deep learning on non-contrast brain CT scan and included an explainability or interpretability method were eligible. Reviews, editorials, conference abstracts without full text, and studies without XAI components were excluded. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to September 2025. Data were extracted on study design, imaging inputs, AI task, explainability technique, validation strategy, and reported clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Most investigations focused on hematoma detection, segmentation, or prediction of functional outcome or mortality. Gradient-based visualization techniques, particularly Grad-CAM and saliency maps, were the most commonly used explainability approaches. XAI outputs predominantly highlighted hematoma regions and perihematomal tissue; however, reporting and interpretation of explainability varied substantially across studies. External validation was infrequent, and few studies formally assessed alignment between XAI outputs and established radiological or clinical reasoning. The evidence was small, heterogeneous, and largely retrospective, with inconsistent reporting of explainability quality and limited external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Explainable AI applied to non-contrast brain CT scan in ICH cases, is an evolving field with growing methodological diversity but limited standardization. While XAI techniques offer potential to enhance transparency and clinician confidence, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical implementation. Future studies should emphasize standardized reporting, external validation, and clinically grounded evaluation of explainability outputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13484914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) scan have demonstrated promising performance in hematoma detection, segmentation, and outcome prediction. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been proposed as a strategy to improve transparency and facilitate clinical integration. This study aimed to map and summarize XAI methods used in CT scan-based studies of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and to assess their validation approaches, transparency, and clinical relevance.

Method:  The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/5kxbt). In this review, original studies of adult and pediatric patients with spontaneous ICH that used AI or deep learning on non-contrast brain CT scan and included an explainability or interpretability method were eligible. Reviews, editorials, conference abstracts without full text, and studies without XAI components were excluded. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to September 2025. Data were extracted on study design, imaging inputs, AI task, explainability technique, validation strategy, and reported clinical relevance.

Results: A total of twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Most investigations focused on hematoma detection, segmentation, or prediction of functional outcome or mortality. Gradient-based visualization techniques, particularly Grad-CAM and saliency maps, were the most commonly used explainability approaches. XAI outputs predominantly highlighted hematoma regions and perihematomal tissue; however, reporting and interpretation of explainability varied substantially across studies. External validation was infrequent, and few studies formally assessed alignment between XAI outputs and established radiological or clinical reasoning. The evidence was small, heterogeneous, and largely retrospective, with inconsistent reporting of explainability quality and limited external validation.

Conclusion: Explainable AI applied to non-contrast brain CT scan in ICH cases, is an evolving field with growing methodological diversity but limited standardization. While XAI techniques offer potential to enhance transparency and clinician confidence, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical implementation. Future studies should emphasize standardized reporting, external validation, and clinically grounded evaluation of explainability outputs.

在脑出血的非对比脑计算机断层扫描中可解释的人工智能:范围回顾。
人工智能(AI)模型应用于非对比脑计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,在血肿检测、分割和结果预测方面表现良好。可解释人工智能(XAI)已被提出作为提高透明度和促进临床整合的一种策略。本研究旨在绘制和总结基于CT扫描的颅内出血(ICH)研究中使用的XAI方法,并评估其验证方法、透明度和临床相关性。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查,并在开放科学框架(osf.io/5kxbt)上注册。在本综述中,使用人工智能或深度学习进行非对比脑CT扫描并包含可解释性或可解释性方法的成人和儿童自发性脑出血患者的原始研究符合条件。没有全文的综述、社论、会议摘要和没有XAI成分的研究被排除在外。PubMed, Embase和Scopus从成立到2025年9月进行了检索。从研究设计、成像输入、人工智能任务、可解释性技术、验证策略和报告的临床相关性等方面提取数据。结果:共有12项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究集中在血肿检测,分割,或预测功能结局或死亡率。基于梯度的可视化技术,特别是Grad-CAM和显著性图,是最常用的可解释性方法。XAI输出主要突出显示血肿区域和血肿周围组织;然而,在不同的研究中,可解释性的报告和解释存在很大差异。外部验证很少,很少有研究正式评估XAI输出与已建立的放射学或临床推理之间的一致性。证据量小,异质性大,且主要是回顾性的,可解释性质量报告不一致,外部验证有限。结论:可解释人工智能应用于脑出血病例的非对比脑CT扫描是一个不断发展的领域,方法越来越多样化,但标准化程度有限。虽然XAI技术有可能提高透明度和临床医生的信心,但目前的证据仍然不足以支持常规的临床应用。未来的研究应强调标准化报告、外部验证和基于临床的可解释性评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书