Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1245/s10434-026-20393-x
Yi-Chang Chen, Sheng-Chi Chang, Yuan-Yao Tsai, Tao-Wei Ke, Abe Fingerhut, William Tzu-Liang Chen
{"title":"Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yi-Chang Chen, Sheng-Chi Chang, Yuan-Yao Tsai, Tao-Wei Ke, Abe Fingerhut, William Tzu-Liang Chen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-026-20393-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be effective to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis (PM). However, the benefits of prophylactic HIPEC in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of prophylactic HIPEC in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Oncological parameters were extracted and pooled to analyze peritoneal metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2023 patients (1470 in the control group and 553 in the prophylactic HIPEC group) originating from nine studies. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year peritoneal metastasis-free survival, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival were better in the prophylactic HIPEC group than in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.521, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.292-0.930], P = 0.028; HR 0.333, 95% CI [0.152-0.731], P = 0.006; HR 0.334, 95% CI [0.125-0.887], P < 0.028; HR 0.701, 95% CI [0.574-0.855], P < 0.001; HR 0.714, 95% CI [0.590-0.864], P = 0.001), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival, postoperative major complications, leakage, or surgical site complications between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While prophylactic HIPEC appears to improve peritoneal metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation through future high-quality randomized studies and collaborative individual patient data meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"10223-10233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-20393-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to be effective to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis (PM). However, the benefits of prophylactic HIPEC in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of prophylactic HIPEC in this setting.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Oncological parameters were extracted and pooled to analyze peritoneal metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Results: We included 2023 patients (1470 in the control group and 553 in the prophylactic HIPEC group) originating from nine studies. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year peritoneal metastasis-free survival, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival were better in the prophylactic HIPEC group than in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.521, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.292-0.930], P = 0.028; HR 0.333, 95% CI [0.152-0.731], P = 0.006; HR 0.334, 95% CI [0.125-0.887], P < 0.028; HR 0.701, 95% CI [0.574-0.855], P < 0.001; HR 0.714, 95% CI [0.590-0.864], P = 0.001), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival, postoperative major complications, leakage, or surgical site complications between groups.

Conclusions: While prophylactic HIPEC appears to improve peritoneal metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation through future high-quality randomized studies and collaborative individual patient data meta-analyses.

局部晚期结直肠癌预防性腹腔热化疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:高温腹腔化疗(HIPEC)已被证明是治疗腹膜癌(PM)的有效方法。然而,预防性HIPEC对局部晚期结直肠癌患者的益处尚不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在确定预防性HIPEC在这种情况下的影响。方法:我们根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准,使用PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献综述。提取肿瘤参数并汇总分析腹膜无转移生存期、无病生存期和总生存期。结果:我们纳入了来自9项研究的2023例患者(对照组1470例,预防性HIPEC组553例)。为期一年,3年,5年腹膜metastasis-free生存,3年和5年无病生存预防性HIPEC组比对照组(危险比[HR] 0.521, 95%可信区间[CI] [0.292 - -0.930], P = 0.028;人力资源0.333,95%可信区间(0.152 - -0.731),P = 0.006;人力资源0.334,95%可信区间(0.125 - -0.887),P < 0.028;人力资源0.701,95% CI (0.574 - -0.855), P < 0.001;人力资源0.714,95% CI [0.590 - -0.864], P = 0.001),分别。两组间总生存率、术后主要并发症、渗漏或手术部位并发症无统计学差异。结论:虽然预防性HIPEC似乎可以改善腹膜无转移生存和无病生存,但研究结果应谨慎解释,并需要通过未来的高质量随机研究和协作个体患者数据荟萃分析来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书