Limited Agreement Between Perceptual and Physiological Heat Strain at Initial Stay Times for Continuous Work in the Heat Before Heat Alleviation Controls

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-08 Epub Date: 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1002/ajim.70127
Gil Bourgois, Kristina-Marie T. Janetos, Fergus K. O'Connor, Leonidas G. Ioannou, Glen P. Kenny
{"title":"Limited Agreement Between Perceptual and Physiological Heat Strain at Initial Stay Times for Continuous Work in the Heat Before Heat Alleviation Controls","authors":"Gil Bourgois,&nbsp;Kristina-Marie T. Janetos,&nbsp;Fergus K. O'Connor,&nbsp;Leonidas G. Ioannou,&nbsp;Glen P. Kenny","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate assessment of heat strain at initial stay time (IST; core temperature 38.0°C or Δ1.0°C above resting), when heat mitigation decisions are required, is critical for managing occupational heat exposure. We evaluated the relationship and agreement between physiological (Physiological Strain Index [PSI] and adaptive PSI [aPSI]) and perceptual (Perceptual Strain Index [PeSI]) indices during simulated occupational work performed until IST.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-seven healthy adults completed treadmill walking to IST at either moderate-intensity (200 W·m<sup>−2</sup>; 24 young [12 females] and 25 older adults [13 females]) or heavy-intensity (260 W·m<sup>−2</sup>; 24 young [12 females] and 24 older adults [12 females]) at wet-bulb globe temperatures (WBGT) of 26°C, 29°C, or 32°C. Core and skin temperatures, heart rate, thermal sensation, and ratings of perceived exertion were measured to calculate PSI, aPSI, and PeSI. Relationships between indices were assessed using linear mixed-effects models, and agreement was evaluated using Bland−Altman analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PeSI increased with PSI and aPSI during moderate- and heavy-intensity work (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). These relationships were not modified by group, environmental condition, body surface area, or aerobic fitness. However, agreement between perceptual and physiological indices was limited, showing wide limits of agreement between PSI and PeSI during moderate- (−2.3 to 4.2 AU) and heavy-intensity (−3.0 to 4.0 AU) work. The agreement between PeSI and aPSI was modestly improved but remained variable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We show that although perceptual responses increase with physiological heat strain, they do not reliably reflect physiological burden at IST, when decisions regarding the implementation of heat mitigation strategies are required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"69 11","pages":"972-983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate assessment of heat strain at initial stay time (IST; core temperature 38.0°C or Δ1.0°C above resting), when heat mitigation decisions are required, is critical for managing occupational heat exposure. We evaluated the relationship and agreement between physiological (Physiological Strain Index [PSI] and adaptive PSI [aPSI]) and perceptual (Perceptual Strain Index [PeSI]) indices during simulated occupational work performed until IST.

Methods

Ninety-seven healthy adults completed treadmill walking to IST at either moderate-intensity (200 W·m−2; 24 young [12 females] and 25 older adults [13 females]) or heavy-intensity (260 W·m−2; 24 young [12 females] and 24 older adults [12 females]) at wet-bulb globe temperatures (WBGT) of 26°C, 29°C, or 32°C. Core and skin temperatures, heart rate, thermal sensation, and ratings of perceived exertion were measured to calculate PSI, aPSI, and PeSI. Relationships between indices were assessed using linear mixed-effects models, and agreement was evaluated using Bland−Altman analyses.

Results

PeSI increased with PSI and aPSI during moderate- and heavy-intensity work (all p < 0.01). These relationships were not modified by group, environmental condition, body surface area, or aerobic fitness. However, agreement between perceptual and physiological indices was limited, showing wide limits of agreement between PSI and PeSI during moderate- (−2.3 to 4.2 AU) and heavy-intensity (−3.0 to 4.0 AU) work. The agreement between PeSI and aPSI was modestly improved but remained variable.

Conclusion

We show that although perceptual responses increase with physiological heat strain, they do not reliably reflect physiological burden at IST, when decisions regarding the implementation of heat mitigation strategies are required.

在热缓解控制之前,在高温下连续工作的初始停留时间感知和生理热应变之间的有限一致。
引言:当需要热缓解决策时,准确评估初始停留时间(IST;核心温度38.0°C或高于静止温度Δ1.0°C)的热应变对管理职业热暴露至关重要。我们评估了生理(生理应变指数[PSI]和适应性PSI [aPSI])和感知(感知应变指数[PeSI])在模拟职业工作期间的关系和一致性。方法:97名健康成人以中等强度(200 W·m-2; 24名年轻[12名女性]和25名老年人[13名女性])或高强度(260 W·m-2; 24名年轻[12名女性]和24名老年人[12名女性])在湿球温度(WBGT)为26°C, 29°C或32°C的条件下完成跑步机步行至IST。测量核心和皮肤温度、心率、热感觉和感知运动评分,以计算PSI、aPSI和PeSI。使用线性混合效应模型评估指标之间的关系,并使用Bland-Altman分析评估一致性。结果:在中等强度和高强度的工作中,PeSI随着PSI和aPSI的增加而增加。结论:尽管知觉反应随着生理热应变的增加而增加,但当需要实施热缓解策略时,它们并不能可靠地反映IST的生理负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书