AI-derived Histopathological Signatures Are Associated With Response to Mepolizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jens Tidemandsen, Simon Høj, Thomas Hl Jensen, Martin Stampe, Anne Sophie Homøe, Marie Høxbro, Kasper Aanæs, Sarah Charabi, Vibeke Backer
{"title":"AI-derived Histopathological Signatures Are Associated With Response to Mepolizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.","authors":"Jens Tidemandsen, Simon Høj, Thomas Hl Jensen, Martin Stampe, Anne Sophie Homøe, Marie Høxbro, Kasper Aanæs, Sarah Charabi, Vibeke Backer","doi":"10.1177/19458924261469379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with variable response to biologic therapy. Tissue-based predictors of treatment response are limited, and conventional eosinophil-focused histopathology has shown inconsistent predictive value.ObjectiveTo assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-derived baseline histopathology of nasal polyps contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP.MethodsThis hypothesis-generating substudy included patients with severe CRSwNP enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Baseline biopsies were analysed using an AI-driven spatial histopathology pipeline extracting 84 morphological features per cell. Features were evaluated in eosinophil-only, noneosinophil, and all-cell configurations. Treatment response at 6 and 12 months was defined using EUFOREA criteria. Linear discriminant analysis and partial least squares regression were applied.ResultsFifty-eight patients were included. At 12 months, the eosinophil-only model showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.43), the noneosinophil model moderate discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.62), and the all-cell model the highest performance (AUC ≈ 0.75). At 6 months, all models showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.49). For continuous outcomes, noneosinophil models explained the greatest variance (R<sup>2</sup> up to ≈ 0.34).ConclusionAI-derived baseline histopathology contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP. Models incorporating the broader tissue microenvironment outperformed eosinophil-focused approaches, supporting the potential of computational pathology for pretreatment stratification of biologic therapy in CRSwNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"19458924261469379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924261469379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with variable response to biologic therapy. Tissue-based predictors of treatment response are limited, and conventional eosinophil-focused histopathology has shown inconsistent predictive value.ObjectiveTo assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-derived baseline histopathology of nasal polyps contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP.MethodsThis hypothesis-generating substudy included patients with severe CRSwNP enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Baseline biopsies were analysed using an AI-driven spatial histopathology pipeline extracting 84 morphological features per cell. Features were evaluated in eosinophil-only, noneosinophil, and all-cell configurations. Treatment response at 6 and 12 months was defined using EUFOREA criteria. Linear discriminant analysis and partial least squares regression were applied.ResultsFifty-eight patients were included. At 12 months, the eosinophil-only model showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.43), the noneosinophil model moderate discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.62), and the all-cell model the highest performance (AUC ≈ 0.75). At 6 months, all models showed limited discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.49). For continuous outcomes, noneosinophil models explained the greatest variance (R2 up to ≈ 0.34).ConclusionAI-derived baseline histopathology contains information associated with clinical response to mepolizumab in CRSwNP. Models incorporating the broader tissue microenvironment outperformed eosinophil-focused approaches, supporting the potential of computational pathology for pretreatment stratification of biologic therapy in CRSwNP.

人工智能衍生的组织病理学特征与Mepolizumab对慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的反应相关
慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)是一种异质性炎症性疾病,对生物治疗有不同的反应。基于组织的治疗反应预测是有限的,传统的嗜酸性粒细胞聚焦的组织病理学显示出不一致的预测价值。目的评估人工智能(AI)衍生的鼻息肉基线组织病理学是否包含与CRSwNP患者对mepolizumab的临床反应相关的信息。方法:该亚研究纳入了一项随机对照试验的重症CRSwNP患者。基线活检使用人工智能驱动的空间组织病理学管道进行分析,提取每个细胞84个形态学特征。在仅嗜酸性粒细胞、非嗜酸性粒细胞和全细胞构型中评估特征。使用EUFOREA标准定义6个月和12个月的治疗反应。采用线性判别分析和偏最小二乘回归。结果共纳入58例患者。12个月时,仅嗜酸性粒细胞模型的识别能力有限(AUC≈0.43),非嗜酸性粒细胞模型的识别能力中等(AUC≈0.62),全细胞模型的识别能力最高(AUC≈0.75)。6个月时,所有模型均表现出有限的识别(AUC≈0.49)。对于连续结果,非嗜酸性粒细胞模型解释了最大的方差(R2高达≈0.34)。ai衍生的基线组织病理学包含与CRSwNP患者对mepolizumab的临床反应相关的信息。结合更广泛的组织微环境的模型优于以嗜酸性粒细胞为中心的方法,支持了计算病理学在CRSwNP生物治疗预处理分层中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书