TOEPVA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, efficacy and feasibility.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
J Patel, S Gupta, Y Devabalan, S Nagala, R Moorthy
{"title":"TOEPVA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, efficacy and feasibility.","authors":"J Patel, S Gupta, Y Devabalan, S Nagala, R Moorthy","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2026.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aim to critically evaluate existing literature on transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOEPVA) - a remote-access technique developed to eliminate visible cervical scarring in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) while preserving optimal cure rates. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy and operative outcomes of TOEPVA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,991 records across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Scopus were identified following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible designs included case series and nonrandomised comparative cohort studies reporting TOEPVA in adults. Primary outcome was biochemical cure; secondary outcomes included operative time, length of stay, complication rates, cosmetic satisfaction and pain scores. Meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine studies comprising 259 patients were analysed. Biochemical cure was achieved in 98.8% (<i>n</i> = 256). Complication rates were low: transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paresis 2.73% (<i>n</i> = 4), permanent RLN injury 0%, mental nerve dysfunction 1.94% (<i>n</i> = 5), transient hypocalcaemia 5.55% (<i>n</i> = 10) and permanent hypoparathyroidism 0%; 4.37% (<i>n</i> = 11) required conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time was 108 minutes; median hospital stay was 3 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a highly selected patient cohort, TOEPVA offers short-term efficacy and low morbidity similar to that of conventional open parathyroidectomy, with the potential for improved cosmetic outcomes. However, current evidence is limited to small single-centre experiences. Prospective multicentre randomised studies with standardised reporting are required to clarify its role among conventional and other remote-access approaches. Further evidence is required to define its role in patients with nonconcordant or negative preoperative imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aim to critically evaluate existing literature on transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOEPVA) - a remote-access technique developed to eliminate visible cervical scarring in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) while preserving optimal cure rates. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy and operative outcomes of TOEPVA.

Methods: A total of 1,991 records across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Scopus were identified following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible designs included case series and nonrandomised comparative cohort studies reporting TOEPVA in adults. Primary outcome was biochemical cure; secondary outcomes included operative time, length of stay, complication rates, cosmetic satisfaction and pain scores. Meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.

Findings: Nine studies comprising 259 patients were analysed. Biochemical cure was achieved in 98.8% (n = 256). Complication rates were low: transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paresis 2.73% (n = 4), permanent RLN injury 0%, mental nerve dysfunction 1.94% (n = 5), transient hypocalcaemia 5.55% (n = 10) and permanent hypoparathyroidism 0%; 4.37% (n = 11) required conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time was 108 minutes; median hospital stay was 3 days.

Conclusions: In a highly selected patient cohort, TOEPVA offers short-term efficacy and low morbidity similar to that of conventional open parathyroidectomy, with the potential for improved cosmetic outcomes. However, current evidence is limited to small single-centre experiences. Prospective multicentre randomised studies with standardised reporting are required to clarify its role among conventional and other remote-access approaches. Further evidence is required to define its role in patients with nonconcordant or negative preoperative imaging.

TOEPVA:安全性、有效性和可行性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:我们的目的是批判性地评估现有的经口经前庭入路(TOEPVA)经鼻内镜甲状旁腺切除术的文献,这是一种远程进入技术,用于消除原发性甲状旁腺功能亢(pHPT)治疗中可见的宫颈瘢痕,同时保持最佳治愈率。本系统综述评估TOEPVA的安全性、有效性和手术结果。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南对PubMed、Cochrane、Embase和Scopus共1991条记录进行鉴定。符合条件的设计包括报告成人TOEPVA的病例系列和非随机比较队列研究。主要结局为生化治愈;次要结果包括手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率、美容满意度和疼痛评分。meta分析采用Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换。结果:9项研究包括259例患者进行了分析。生化治愈率为98.8% (n = 256)。并发症发生率低:一过性喉返神经麻痹2.73% (n = 4),永久性喉返神经损伤0%,精神神经功能障碍1.94% (n = 5),一过性低钙5.55% (n = 10),永久性甲状旁腺功能减退0%;4.37% (n = 11)需要转开手术。平均手术时间108分钟;平均住院时间为3天。结论:在一个高度选择的患者队列中,TOEPVA具有与传统开放式甲状旁腺切除术相似的短期疗效和低发病率,具有改善美容效果的潜力。然而,目前的证据仅限于小的单中心经验。需要进行标准化报告的前瞻性多中心随机研究,以阐明其在传统方法和其他远程访问方法中的作用。需要进一步的证据来确定其在术前影像不一致或阴性患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书