Standardization of color change interpretation for sterilization chemical indicators: A multicenter analysis aligned with international safety color standards.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yao Shen, Shan Zhong, Jiaxin Lv, Zhuoya Yao, Youhao Tian, Jiaxin Liu, Tao Song, Mengjie Chang, Jingjing Du, Haiqun Ban, Xianzhao Zheng
{"title":"Standardization of color change interpretation for sterilization chemical indicators: A multicenter analysis aligned with international safety color standards.","authors":"Yao Shen, Shan Zhong, Jiaxin Lv, Zhuoya Yao, Youhao Tian, Jiaxin Liu, Tao Song, Mengjie Chang, Jingjing Du, Haiqun Ban, Xianzhao Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2026.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To establish a standardized framework for interpreting color changes in chemical indicators (CIs) in sterilization, and improve accuracy and clinical feasibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was administered to 902 health care professionals to evaluate their interpretation difficulties, confusion rates, and support for a unified color standard. In addition, pre- and post-sterilization CI color data were collected across 4 sterilization modalities: steam (n = 74), hydrogen peroxide plasma (n = 63), ethylene oxide (n = 38), and formaldehyde (n = 28). Data were compared with ISO 11140-1:2014 and GB/T 18282.1-2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among clinical staff, 32.71% reported interpretation difficulties, with the main reasons being ambiguous color changes (58.3%) and non-uniform standards (41.7%), and 25.17% had confused indicators for different sterilization modalities. Notably, 87.36% supported a unified color standard. Post-sterilization color changes varied markedly across and within modalities: steam predominantly turned black, plasma predominantly turned yellow, ethylene oxide predominantly turned green/blue, and formaldehyde predominantly turned green.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current lack of cross‑manufacturer harmonization in CI color‑change schemes leads to confusion and misinterpretation risks among clinical staff. A unified, intuitive color‑change standard, preferably based on an international safety color system, is urgently needed to improve the accuracy and practicality of sterile package assessment, thereby ensuring patient safety and reducing clinical risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2026.08.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To establish a standardized framework for interpreting color changes in chemical indicators (CIs) in sterilization, and improve accuracy and clinical feasibility.

Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 902 health care professionals to evaluate their interpretation difficulties, confusion rates, and support for a unified color standard. In addition, pre- and post-sterilization CI color data were collected across 4 sterilization modalities: steam (n = 74), hydrogen peroxide plasma (n = 63), ethylene oxide (n = 38), and formaldehyde (n = 28). Data were compared with ISO 11140-1:2014 and GB/T 18282.1-2025.

Results: Among clinical staff, 32.71% reported interpretation difficulties, with the main reasons being ambiguous color changes (58.3%) and non-uniform standards (41.7%), and 25.17% had confused indicators for different sterilization modalities. Notably, 87.36% supported a unified color standard. Post-sterilization color changes varied markedly across and within modalities: steam predominantly turned black, plasma predominantly turned yellow, ethylene oxide predominantly turned green/blue, and formaldehyde predominantly turned green.

Conclusions: The current lack of cross‑manufacturer harmonization in CI color‑change schemes leads to confusion and misinterpretation risks among clinical staff. A unified, intuitive color‑change standard, preferably based on an international safety color system, is urgently needed to improve the accuracy and practicality of sterile package assessment, thereby ensuring patient safety and reducing clinical risks.

灭菌化学指标颜色变化解释的标准化:与国际安全颜色标准一致的多中心分析。
目的:建立灭菌过程中化学指标颜色变化的标准化解释框架,提高准确性和临床可行性。方法:对902名卫生保健专业人员进行问卷调查,评估他们的解释困难、混淆率和对统一颜色标准的支持度。此外,通过四种灭菌方式收集了灭菌前后的CI颜色数据:蒸汽(n=74)、过氧化氢血浆(n=63)、环氧乙烷(n=38)和甲醛(n=28)。数据与ISO 11140-1:2014和GB/T 18282.1-2025进行比较。结果:32.71%的临床工作人员报告翻译困难,主要原因是颜色变化不明确(58.3%)和标准不统一(41.7%),25.17%的临床工作人员混淆了不同灭菌方式的指标。值得注意的是,87.36%的人支持统一的颜色标准。灭菌后的颜色变化在不同的模式和模式内都有明显的变化:蒸汽主要变成黑色,血浆主要变成黄色,环氧乙烷主要变成绿色/蓝色,甲醛主要变成绿色。结论:目前CI配色方案缺乏跨厂商协调导致临床工作人员混淆和误解风险。为了提高无菌包装评估的准确性和实用性,确保患者安全,降低临床风险,迫切需要一个统一、直观的颜色变化标准,最好是基于国际安全颜色系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书