Shaoyao Gancao decoction for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postherpetic neuralgia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2026-07-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/AEVA1650
Jinfeng Zhao, Fengyun Wang, Fang Wang, Ling Ma
{"title":"Shaoyao Gancao decoction for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postherpetic neuralgia.","authors":"Jinfeng Zhao, Fengyun Wang, Fang Wang, Ling Ma","doi":"10.62347/AEVA1650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction (SGD) for neuropathic pain (NP), with a focused analysis on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the most evidence-rich subtype, and to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SGD for PHN were retrieved from databases up to March 2026. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3, and effect sizes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs involving 1,188 patients with PHN (594 per group) were included. Compared with conventional Western medicine alone, the addition of SGD significantly improved the overall response rate (OR=5.42, 95% CI: 3.40-8.64, P<0.0001), reduced Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score (MD=-1.33, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.99, P<0.0001), improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score (MD=-2.23, 95% CI: -2.85 to -1.62, P<0.0001), and lowered the incidence of adverse events (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.56, P<0.0001). Subgroup analyses by treatment duration (14 and 28 days) showed consistent analgesic effects and overall efficacy. Pain Rating Index (PRI) and Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scores were also significantly improved in the SGD group (both P<0.0001). Although high heterogeneity was observed in VAS (I<sup>2</sup>=97%), subgroup and sensitivity analyses suggested that the pooled results remained robust. Given that PHN represents a common NP subtype, SGD may have potential therapeutic value for broader NP conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence supports SGD as an adjunctive therapy for PHN, with good efficacy and safety. Its potential value for other NP types (such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy) warrants further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"18 7","pages":"6055-6068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13495650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/AEVA1650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction (SGD) for neuropathic pain (NP), with a focused analysis on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the most evidence-rich subtype, and to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SGD for PHN were retrieved from databases up to March 2026. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3, and effect sizes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 1,188 patients with PHN (594 per group) were included. Compared with conventional Western medicine alone, the addition of SGD significantly improved the overall response rate (OR=5.42, 95% CI: 3.40-8.64, P<0.0001), reduced Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score (MD=-1.33, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.99, P<0.0001), improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score (MD=-2.23, 95% CI: -2.85 to -1.62, P<0.0001), and lowered the incidence of adverse events (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.56, P<0.0001). Subgroup analyses by treatment duration (14 and 28 days) showed consistent analgesic effects and overall efficacy. Pain Rating Index (PRI) and Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scores were also significantly improved in the SGD group (both P<0.0001). Although high heterogeneity was observed in VAS (I2=97%), subgroup and sensitivity analyses suggested that the pooled results remained robust. Given that PHN represents a common NP subtype, SGD may have potential therapeutic value for broader NP conditions.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports SGD as an adjunctive therapy for PHN, with good efficacy and safety. Its potential value for other NP types (such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy) warrants further research.

少药甘草汤治疗神经性疼痛:带状疱疹后神经痛的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价少药甘草汤(SGD)治疗神经性疼痛(NP)的疗效和安全性,重点分析证据最丰富的带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)亚型,为临床决策提供依据。方法:从截至2026年3月的数据库中检索SGD治疗PHN的随机对照试验(rct)。两位审稿人独立筛选文献,提取数据,并使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析,效应量用比值比(OR)或均值差(MD)表示,95%置信区间(ci)。结果:纳入15项随机对照试验,共1188例PHN患者(每组594例)。与单用传统西药相比,加用SGD显著提高了总有效率(OR=5.42, 95% CI: 3.40 ~ 8.64, P2=97%),亚组分析和敏感性分析显示合并结果仍然稳健。鉴于PHN代表一种常见的NP亚型,SGD可能对更广泛的NP疾病具有潜在的治疗价值。结论:目前证据支持SGD作为PHN的辅助治疗,具有良好的疗效和安全性。它对其他NP类型(如糖尿病周围神经病变、化疗引起的神经病变)的潜在价值值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书