Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed-methods study in patients with active, in-remission and high-risk diabetic foot disease.

IF 3 3区 医学
Michael Lockhart, Jack Cosgrave, Pir Zainulabdeen Jan Sarhandi, Kellie Fortune, Eimear Daly, Tommy Kyaw Tun, Colin Davenport, Seamus Sreenan, Derek T O'Keeffe, John H McDermott
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed-methods study in patients with active, in-remission and high-risk diabetic foot disease.","authors":"Michael Lockhart, Jack Cosgrave, Pir Zainulabdeen Jan Sarhandi, Kellie Fortune, Eimear Daly, Tommy Kyaw Tun, Colin Davenport, Seamus Sreenan, Derek T O'Keeffe, John H McDermott","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13492248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease.

Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis.

Results: While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video.

Conclusions: This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.

评估糖尿病足护理动画教育工具的有效性和可接受性:一项针对活动性、缓解期和高风险糖尿病足病患者的随机对照试验和混合方法研究
糖尿病患者每年发生糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的风险为2%。降低再溃疡风险的新方法可以降低糖尿病足病的成本。材料和方法:本研究纳入了52例活动性足病、既往DFU史和/或高风险足的患者。患者按50:50随机分配,由足科医生进行常规教育,或观看由研究小组为这项探索性试点研究开发的定制足部自我保健教育动画。采用改进的诺丁汉功能足部护理评估(NAFF)问卷记录干预前后的安全足部护理行为知识。主要观察指标为自我护理知识得分的变化。同时,对干预组26例患者进行混合方法可接受性研究,采用20项技术接受模型获得定量数据。定性数据是通过诊所面对面访谈获得的,并使用专题分析进行检验。结果:两组患者足部自我护理知识得分均高于对照组,但只有干预组在组内有统计学意义的改善。干预组在知识得分上有更大幅度的增加趋势,但没有达到统计学意义。在完成技术可接受性研究的26名患者中,大多数回复赞成教育视频。结论:这项随机对照和混合方法的研究在足部自我保健知识和可接受性方面显示出积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书