Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed-methods study in patients with active, in-remission and high-risk diabetic foot disease.
Michael Lockhart, Jack Cosgrave, Pir Zainulabdeen Jan Sarhandi, Kellie Fortune, Eimear Daly, Tommy Kyaw Tun, Colin Davenport, Seamus Sreenan, Derek T O'Keeffe, John H McDermott
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed-methods study in patients with active, in-remission and high-risk diabetic foot disease.","authors":"Michael Lockhart, Jack Cosgrave, Pir Zainulabdeen Jan Sarhandi, Kellie Fortune, Eimear Daly, Tommy Kyaw Tun, Colin Davenport, Seamus Sreenan, Derek T O'Keeffe, John H McDermott","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13492248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease.
Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis.
Results: While foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video.
Conclusions: This randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).