Optimal sizing of renewable generation and storage for grid-connected CO2 electrolysis: a Dutch case study on syngas production for e-SAF.

IF 10.6 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2026-08-19 eCollection Date: 2026-09-14 DOI:10.1039/d6gc04304f
Thijmen Wiltink, Andrea Ramírez, Mar Pérez-Fortes
{"title":"Optimal sizing of renewable generation and storage for grid-connected CO<sub>2</sub> electrolysis: a Dutch case study on syngas production for e-SAF.","authors":"Thijmen Wiltink, Andrea Ramírez, Mar Pérez-Fortes","doi":"10.1039/d6gc04304f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-electrolysis of CO<sub>2</sub> (CO<sub>2</sub>E) and water enables the production of syngas for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) that are compliant with European RFNBO (renewable fuels of non-biological origin) regulations. However, a mismatch exists between the intermittent renewable electricity supply and the continuous operation of the downstream Fischer-Tropsch plants. To address this, we developed a two-stage linear optimization model to optimize the operation of a 540 MW electrolysis plant, alongside the sizing and operation of the connected renewable generation, battery storage, and syngas storage. Applying this model to a Dutch case study, we explored grid integration with an electrolyzer across future scenarios with global warming potentials (GWPs) ranging between 35 and 370 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per kWh. For generation, the preferred renewable mix is onshore wind combined with PV. When grid mix electricity consumption is restricted, the electrolyzer has an optimal capacity factor of 78% but requires a battery of comparable capacity to the electrolyzer and multi-kilotonne syngas storage to ensure continuous output. Crucially, we found that producing RFNBO-compliant syngas for SAF is impossible with the 2025 Dutch grid mix. Even at a reduced grid intensity of 205 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per kWh, RFNBO compliance limits grid consumption to just 1% of grid mix electricity per hour. This results in a levelized cost of 2350 EUR<sub>2019</sub> per tonne syngas. Unrestricted grid electricity consumption becomes feasible when emissions drop below 36 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per kWh, reducing production costs by 43% (1344 EUR<sub>2019</sub> per tonne syngas). Consequently, we demonstrate that grid composition intensity is a bottleneck for the short-term economic viability and regulatory compliance of CO<sub>2</sub>E-based SAF in the Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"14278-14296"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13487491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6gc04304f","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-electrolysis of CO2 (CO2E) and water enables the production of syngas for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) that are compliant with European RFNBO (renewable fuels of non-biological origin) regulations. However, a mismatch exists between the intermittent renewable electricity supply and the continuous operation of the downstream Fischer-Tropsch plants. To address this, we developed a two-stage linear optimization model to optimize the operation of a 540 MW electrolysis plant, alongside the sizing and operation of the connected renewable generation, battery storage, and syngas storage. Applying this model to a Dutch case study, we explored grid integration with an electrolyzer across future scenarios with global warming potentials (GWPs) ranging between 35 and 370 g CO2-eq per kWh. For generation, the preferred renewable mix is onshore wind combined with PV. When grid mix electricity consumption is restricted, the electrolyzer has an optimal capacity factor of 78% but requires a battery of comparable capacity to the electrolyzer and multi-kilotonne syngas storage to ensure continuous output. Crucially, we found that producing RFNBO-compliant syngas for SAF is impossible with the 2025 Dutch grid mix. Even at a reduced grid intensity of 205 g CO2-eq per kWh, RFNBO compliance limits grid consumption to just 1% of grid mix electricity per hour. This results in a levelized cost of 2350 EUR2019 per tonne syngas. Unrestricted grid electricity consumption becomes feasible when emissions drop below 36 g CO2-eq per kWh, reducing production costs by 43% (1344 EUR2019 per tonne syngas). Consequently, we demonstrate that grid composition intensity is a bottleneck for the short-term economic viability and regulatory compliance of CO2E-based SAF in the Netherlands.

可再生能源发电和并网二氧化碳电解储存的最佳规模:荷兰e-SAF合成气生产案例研究。
二氧化碳(CO2E)和水的共电解能够生产符合欧洲RFNBO(非生物来源的可再生燃料)法规的可持续航空燃料(SAF)的合成气。然而,间歇性可再生电力供应与下游费托工厂的连续运行之间存在不匹配。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个两阶段线性优化模型,以优化540兆瓦电解厂的运行,以及连接的可再生能源发电、电池存储和合成气存储的规模和运行。将该模型应用于荷兰的案例研究中,我们探索了未来全球变暖潜能值(GWPs)在每千瓦时35至370克二氧化碳当量之间的情景中与电解槽的电网整合。在发电方面,首选的可再生能源组合是陆上风能与光伏发电相结合。当电网混合用电受限时,电解槽的最佳容量系数为78%,但需要与电解槽容量相当的电池和数千吨的合成气存储来保证连续输出。至关重要的是,我们发现,在2025年荷兰电网结构中,为SAF生产符合rfnbo标准的合成气是不可能的。即使电网强度降低到每千瓦时205克二氧化碳当量,符合RFNBO规定的电网消耗也限制在每小时电网混合电力的1%。这导致每吨合成气的平准化成本为2350欧元2019。当排放量降至每千瓦时36克二氧化碳当量以下时,无限制的电网电力消耗成为可能,将生产成本降低43%(每吨合成气1344欧元2019)。因此,我们证明了电网构成强度是荷兰基于二氧化碳的SAF短期经济可行性和法规遵从性的瓶颈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书