{"title":"Graduate Labor Market Opportunities Across Chinese Cities: Urban Opportunity Regimes and Their Dynamics","authors":"Yuanyuan Xie, Baoding Wang","doi":"10.1111/grow.70151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines how advertised graduate-oriented entry-level opportunity sets are unevenly organized across Chinese cities and how urban opportunity regimes evolve over time. Existing research on labor market entry and interurban differentiation rarely conceptualizes entry-level opportunities as multidimensional city-level configurations. Using online recruitment data on graduate-oriented job postings for 200 Chinese cities from 2016 to 2024, this study combines inequality measures, Gaussian mixture models, and Markov-based transition analysis to examine the scale, quality, and structure of entry-level opportunities. The results show substantial interurban inequality. Inequality in opportunity scale and structure declined over time, whereas opportunity quality remained the most unequal dimension and displayed the strongest spatial clustering. Four urban opportunity regimes are identified: a Scale-led regime, an Intermediate regime, a High-quality, high-structure regime, and a Moderate-quality, lower-structure regime. The Scale-led regime is the most persistent, whereas the High-quality, high-structure regime remains the least persistent in the high-posterior comparison, although the estimated magnitude of its persistence is sensitive to classification confidence. These findings show that a less concentrated observed distribution of online postings does not by itself imply a comparable equalization in the housing-cost-adjusted quality of advertised graduate-oriented opportunities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how advertised graduate-oriented entry-level opportunity sets are unevenly organized across Chinese cities and how urban opportunity regimes evolve over time. Existing research on labor market entry and interurban differentiation rarely conceptualizes entry-level opportunities as multidimensional city-level configurations. Using online recruitment data on graduate-oriented job postings for 200 Chinese cities from 2016 to 2024, this study combines inequality measures, Gaussian mixture models, and Markov-based transition analysis to examine the scale, quality, and structure of entry-level opportunities. The results show substantial interurban inequality. Inequality in opportunity scale and structure declined over time, whereas opportunity quality remained the most unequal dimension and displayed the strongest spatial clustering. Four urban opportunity regimes are identified: a Scale-led regime, an Intermediate regime, a High-quality, high-structure regime, and a Moderate-quality, lower-structure regime. The Scale-led regime is the most persistent, whereas the High-quality, high-structure regime remains the least persistent in the high-posterior comparison, although the estimated magnitude of its persistence is sensitive to classification confidence. These findings show that a less concentrated observed distribution of online postings does not by itself imply a comparable equalization in the housing-cost-adjusted quality of advertised graduate-oriented opportunities.
期刊介绍:
Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.