Graduate Labor Market Opportunities Across Chinese Cities: Urban Opportunity Regimes and Their Dynamics

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Yuanyuan Xie, Baoding Wang
{"title":"Graduate Labor Market Opportunities Across Chinese Cities: Urban Opportunity Regimes and Their Dynamics","authors":"Yuanyuan Xie,&nbsp;Baoding Wang","doi":"10.1111/grow.70151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines how advertised graduate-oriented entry-level opportunity sets are unevenly organized across Chinese cities and how urban opportunity regimes evolve over time. Existing research on labor market entry and interurban differentiation rarely conceptualizes entry-level opportunities as multidimensional city-level configurations. Using online recruitment data on graduate-oriented job postings for 200 Chinese cities from 2016 to 2024, this study combines inequality measures, Gaussian mixture models, and Markov-based transition analysis to examine the scale, quality, and structure of entry-level opportunities. The results show substantial interurban inequality. Inequality in opportunity scale and structure declined over time, whereas opportunity quality remained the most unequal dimension and displayed the strongest spatial clustering. Four urban opportunity regimes are identified: a Scale-led regime, an Intermediate regime, a High-quality, high-structure regime, and a Moderate-quality, lower-structure regime. The Scale-led regime is the most persistent, whereas the High-quality, high-structure regime remains the least persistent in the high-posterior comparison, although the estimated magnitude of its persistence is sensitive to classification confidence. These findings show that a less concentrated observed distribution of online postings does not by itself imply a comparable equalization in the housing-cost-adjusted quality of advertised graduate-oriented opportunities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how advertised graduate-oriented entry-level opportunity sets are unevenly organized across Chinese cities and how urban opportunity regimes evolve over time. Existing research on labor market entry and interurban differentiation rarely conceptualizes entry-level opportunities as multidimensional city-level configurations. Using online recruitment data on graduate-oriented job postings for 200 Chinese cities from 2016 to 2024, this study combines inequality measures, Gaussian mixture models, and Markov-based transition analysis to examine the scale, quality, and structure of entry-level opportunities. The results show substantial interurban inequality. Inequality in opportunity scale and structure declined over time, whereas opportunity quality remained the most unequal dimension and displayed the strongest spatial clustering. Four urban opportunity regimes are identified: a Scale-led regime, an Intermediate regime, a High-quality, high-structure regime, and a Moderate-quality, lower-structure regime. The Scale-led regime is the most persistent, whereas the High-quality, high-structure regime remains the least persistent in the high-posterior comparison, although the estimated magnitude of its persistence is sensitive to classification confidence. These findings show that a less concentrated observed distribution of online postings does not by itself imply a comparable equalization in the housing-cost-adjusted quality of advertised graduate-oriented opportunities.

中国城市毕业生劳动力市场机会:城市机会机制及其动态
本研究考察了中国城市中以毕业生为导向的入门级就业机会是如何不均匀地组织起来的,以及城市就业机会制度是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。现有的关于劳动力市场进入和城市间分化的研究很少将入门机会概念化为多维城市层面的配置。本研究利用2016年至2024年中国200个城市面向毕业生的在线招聘数据,结合不平等度量、高斯混合模型和马尔可夫过渡分析,考察了入门级就业机会的规模、质量和结构。结果显示了城市间的严重不平等。随着时间的推移,机会规模和结构的不平等程度呈下降趋势,而机会质量维度仍然是最不平等的维度,表现出最强的空间集聚性。确定了四种城市机会机制:规模主导机制、中等机制、高质量、高结构机制和中等质量、低结构机制。在高后验比较中,量表主导的模式是最持久的,而高质量、高结构的模式仍然是最不持久的,尽管其持久性的估计幅度对分类置信度很敏感。这些调查结果表明,观察到的网上招聘分布较不集中,本身并不意味着广告中面向毕业生的就业机会经住房成本调整后的质量相当均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书