Academics for Black Survival and Wellness: A Grassroots Intervention for Black Liberation and Anti-Racism Inside and Outside of Academia

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pearis L. Jean, Della V. Mosley, Brittany Bridges, Amber Lewis,  Wafaa Ateyah, Natalie Malone, Victoria A. McNeil-Young, Christopher Roundtree, Jessica Trochez, Kimberly Burdine, Hannah B. Bayne, Nicole E. Gravina, Kate A. Ratliff, Lisa S. Scott, Anneliese Singh
{"title":"Academics for Black Survival and Wellness: A Grassroots Intervention for Black Liberation and Anti-Racism Inside and Outside of Academia","authors":"Pearis L. Jean,&nbsp;Della V. Mosley,&nbsp;Brittany Bridges,&nbsp;Amber Lewis,&nbsp; Wafaa Ateyah,&nbsp;Natalie Malone,&nbsp;Victoria A. McNeil-Young,&nbsp;Christopher Roundtree,&nbsp;Jessica Trochez,&nbsp;Kimberly Burdine,&nbsp;Hannah B. Bayne,&nbsp;Nicole E. Gravina,&nbsp;Kate A. Ratliff,&nbsp;Lisa S. Scott,&nbsp;Anneliese Singh","doi":"10.1002/jcop.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article provides a summative program evaluation to describe the development, implementation, and outcomes of a grassroots Black liberation and anti-racism initiative, Academics for Black Survival and Wellness. The initiative was founded by Dr. Pearis Jean (formerly Bellamy; graduate student at the time) and Dr. Della V. Mosley (an assistant professor at the time) in response to the events of 2020. The authors used a general inductive approach to analyze archival data from the initiative to identify the program outcomes. Academics for Black Survival and Wellness had two primary program outcomes which were (a) increased wellness resources for Black academics and (b) the use of scholar-activism in support of Black survival and wellness. The authors also reflect on how the organizers maintained the integrity and priorities of the initiative. Recommendations are provided for how grassroots organizing and scholar-activism can be used to support the wellness of Black people and the mobilization of anti-racist allies when oppressive systems are slow or unwilling to change.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.70143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a summative program evaluation to describe the development, implementation, and outcomes of a grassroots Black liberation and anti-racism initiative, Academics for Black Survival and Wellness. The initiative was founded by Dr. Pearis Jean (formerly Bellamy; graduate student at the time) and Dr. Della V. Mosley (an assistant professor at the time) in response to the events of 2020. The authors used a general inductive approach to analyze archival data from the initiative to identify the program outcomes. Academics for Black Survival and Wellness had two primary program outcomes which were (a) increased wellness resources for Black academics and (b) the use of scholar-activism in support of Black survival and wellness. The authors also reflect on how the organizers maintained the integrity and priorities of the initiative. Recommendations are provided for how grassroots organizing and scholar-activism can be used to support the wellness of Black people and the mobilization of anti-racist allies when oppressive systems are slow or unwilling to change.

学术界为黑人生存和健康:学术界内外黑人解放和反种族主义的基层干预
这篇文章提供了一个总结性的项目评估,描述了基层黑人解放和反种族主义倡议的发展、实施和结果,黑人生存和健康学者。该倡议是由Pearis Jean博士(以前是Bellamy,当时是研究生)和Della V. Mosley博士(当时是助理教授)为应对2020年的事件而创立的。作者使用一般的归纳方法来分析来自计划的档案数据,以确定计划的结果。黑人生存和健康学者有两个主要的项目结果:(a)增加了黑人学者的健康资源(b)使用学者行动主义来支持黑人的生存和健康。作者还反思了组织者如何保持项目的完整性和优先级。在压迫性制度缓慢或不愿改变的情况下,如何利用基层组织和学者行动主义来支持黑人的健康和动员反种族主义盟友,提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书