The Influence of Spousal Genotype on Alcohol Problems in Marriage

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sally I-Chun Kuo, Vivia V. McCutcheon, Fazil Aliev, Kathleen K. Bucholz, Danielle M. Dick, Howard J. Edenberg, Victor Hesselbrock, John R. Kramer, Dongbing Lai, Martin H. Plawecki, Marc A. Schuckit, Jessica E. Salvatore
{"title":"The Influence of Spousal Genotype on Alcohol Problems in Marriage","authors":"Sally I-Chun Kuo,&nbsp;Vivia V. McCutcheon,&nbsp;Fazil Aliev,&nbsp;Kathleen K. Bucholz,&nbsp;Danielle M. Dick,&nbsp;Howard J. Edenberg,&nbsp;Victor Hesselbrock,&nbsp;John R. Kramer,&nbsp;Dongbing Lai,&nbsp;Martin H. Plawecki,&nbsp;Marc A. Schuckit,&nbsp;Jessica E. Salvatore","doi":"10.1111/acer.70399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The field's conventional understanding of how genetic factors impact risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) typically focuses on direct genetic effects, or how an individual's own genetic predispositions are associated with the likelihood of experiencing clinically significant alcohol problems. More recently, studies of behavioral health outcomes in preclinical and human studies have demonstrated the potential importance of social genetic effects or the influence of a social partner's genotype on substance use and related outcomes. In this study, we sought to characterize social genetic effects for AUD, specifically in the context of marriage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 660 opposite-sex spousal dyads from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, restricted to individuals who were genetically similar to European reference panels. Measured and latent indicators of genetic risk included polygenic scores of problematic alcohol use (PGS<sub>PAU</sub>) and parental history of AUD (PH<sub>AUD</sub>), respectively. The outcome was Diaganostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 alcohol use disorder criterion count (AUDcrit) during marriage. Multilevel models accounted for the non-independence of partners' data, including correlations between partners' genetic risk and residual covariance in AUDcrit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After accounting for direct genetic effects (i.e., the influence of one's own genetic predispositions) and the correlations between partners' genetic predispositions, we found that having a spouse with higher PGS<sub>PAU</sub> was associated with higher AUDcrit (B = 0.084, 95% CI [0.035, 0.132]). This social genetic effect was robust after adjusting for both partners' educational attainment. Spousal PH<sub>AUD</sub> was not associated with AUDcrit. Exploratory analyses indicated that the social genetic effect of spousal PGS<sub>PAU</sub> was stronger among male target individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight the potential importance of social genetic effects for understanding the pathways from genotype to alcohol use disorder and the need for further investigation of latent measures of genetic predispositions in studies of social genetic effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"50 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70399","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The field's conventional understanding of how genetic factors impact risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD) typically focuses on direct genetic effects, or how an individual's own genetic predispositions are associated with the likelihood of experiencing clinically significant alcohol problems. More recently, studies of behavioral health outcomes in preclinical and human studies have demonstrated the potential importance of social genetic effects or the influence of a social partner's genotype on substance use and related outcomes. In this study, we sought to characterize social genetic effects for AUD, specifically in the context of marriage.

Methods

The sample included 660 opposite-sex spousal dyads from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, restricted to individuals who were genetically similar to European reference panels. Measured and latent indicators of genetic risk included polygenic scores of problematic alcohol use (PGSPAU) and parental history of AUD (PHAUD), respectively. The outcome was Diaganostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 alcohol use disorder criterion count (AUDcrit) during marriage. Multilevel models accounted for the non-independence of partners' data, including correlations between partners' genetic risk and residual covariance in AUDcrit.

Results

After accounting for direct genetic effects (i.e., the influence of one's own genetic predispositions) and the correlations between partners' genetic predispositions, we found that having a spouse with higher PGSPAU was associated with higher AUDcrit (B = 0.084, 95% CI [0.035, 0.132]). This social genetic effect was robust after adjusting for both partners' educational attainment. Spousal PHAUD was not associated with AUDcrit. Exploratory analyses indicated that the social genetic effect of spousal PGSPAU was stronger among male target individuals.

Conclusions

Findings highlight the potential importance of social genetic effects for understanding the pathways from genotype to alcohol use disorder and the need for further investigation of latent measures of genetic predispositions in studies of social genetic effects.

配偶基因型对婚姻中酒精问题的影响
该领域对遗传因素如何影响酒精使用障碍(AUD)风险的传统理解通常集中在直接的遗传效应上,或者个人自身的遗传倾向如何与经历临床显著酒精问题的可能性相关。最近,在临床前和人体研究中对行为健康结果的研究表明,社会遗传效应或社会伴侣的基因型对物质使用和相关结果的影响具有潜在的重要性。在这项研究中,我们试图描述AUD的社会遗传影响,特别是在婚姻的背景下。方法样本包括来自酒精中毒遗传学合作研究的660对异性配偶,仅限于基因与欧洲参考小组相似的个体。测量的和潜在的遗传风险指标分别包括问题酒精使用的多基因评分(PGSPAU)和父母AUD史(PHAUD)。结果是诊断与统计手册(DSM)-5婚姻期间酒精使用障碍标准计数(AUDcrit)。多层模型解释了伴侣数据的非独立性,包括AUDcrit中伴侣遗传风险和残差协方差之间的相关性。结果在考虑了直接遗传效应(即自身遗传倾向的影响)和伴侣遗传倾向之间的相关性后,我们发现配偶PGSPAU较高与较高的AUDcrit相关(B = 0.084, 95% CI[0.035, 0.132])。在对双方的受教育程度进行调整后,这种社会遗传效应仍然很强。配偶PHAUD与AUDcrit无关。探索性分析表明,配偶PGSPAU的社会遗传效应在男性目标个体中更强。研究结果强调了社会遗传效应对于理解从基因型到酒精使用障碍的途径的潜在重要性,以及在社会遗传效应研究中进一步研究遗传易感性的潜在措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书