{"title":"Effects of Biochar and Nitrogen-Enriched Biochar on Tree Growth in Scots Pine Stands","authors":"Kjersti Holt Hanssen, Jogeir Stokland, Rasmus Astrup","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar, a carbon-rich product of pyrolysis, is increasingly considered for soil amendment and climate change mitigation due to its potential to enhance soil properties and sequester carbon. However, its effects on tree growth in forest ecosystems remain uncertain. This study investigated the impact of biochar and nitrogen-enriched biochar on the growth of two middle-aged (approximately 60-year-old) Scots pine stands in southeastern Norway. Both stands were characterized by medium site indices and podzolic soils. In replicated field experiments, we applied four treatments consisting of an unfertilized control, and addition of biochar (2.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), nitrogen fertilizer (150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), or biochar loaded with nitrogen (2.5 t biochar +150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>). The biochar was produced by pyrolysis of Norway spruce wood chips at 600°C. After 5 years, only treatments containing added nitrogen (either as mineral fertilizer or as nutrient-enriched biochar) significantly increased basal area and volume growth compared to control. No significant difference in timing or magnitude of effects was observed between the nitrogen and biochar + nitrogen treatments, except better annual growth in the combined treatment the third year after fertilization, indicating rapid nitrogen release and uptake regardless of carrier. Pure biochar did not stimulate tree growth. While biochar did not negatively affect growth, its direct role as a growth stimulant was not supported under these conditions, at least in the short-term with the dose of 2.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. Further research is needed across different forest ages, site types, and application rates to fully understand biochar's potential in forestry.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70148","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biochar, a carbon-rich product of pyrolysis, is increasingly considered for soil amendment and climate change mitigation due to its potential to enhance soil properties and sequester carbon. However, its effects on tree growth in forest ecosystems remain uncertain. This study investigated the impact of biochar and nitrogen-enriched biochar on the growth of two middle-aged (approximately 60-year-old) Scots pine stands in southeastern Norway. Both stands were characterized by medium site indices and podzolic soils. In replicated field experiments, we applied four treatments consisting of an unfertilized control, and addition of biochar (2.5 t ha−1), nitrogen fertilizer (150 kg N ha−1), or biochar loaded with nitrogen (2.5 t biochar +150 kg N ha−1). The biochar was produced by pyrolysis of Norway spruce wood chips at 600°C. After 5 years, only treatments containing added nitrogen (either as mineral fertilizer or as nutrient-enriched biochar) significantly increased basal area and volume growth compared to control. No significant difference in timing or magnitude of effects was observed between the nitrogen and biochar + nitrogen treatments, except better annual growth in the combined treatment the third year after fertilization, indicating rapid nitrogen release and uptake regardless of carrier. Pure biochar did not stimulate tree growth. While biochar did not negatively affect growth, its direct role as a growth stimulant was not supported under these conditions, at least in the short-term with the dose of 2.5 t ha−1. Further research is needed across different forest ages, site types, and application rates to fully understand biochar's potential in forestry.
生物炭是一种富含碳的热解产物,由于其具有增强土壤特性和固碳的潜力,越来越多地被认为可用于土壤修复和减缓气候变化。然而,它对森林生态系统中树木生长的影响仍不确定。本研究调查了生物炭和富氮生物炭对挪威东南部两个中年(约60岁)苏格兰松林生长的影响。两个林分的立地指数均为中等,土壤为灰化土。在重复田间试验中,我们采用了四种处理,包括不施肥对照、添加生物炭(2.5 t ha−1)、氮肥(150 kg N ha−1)或载氮生物炭(2.5 t生物炭+150 kg N ha−1)。以挪威云杉木屑为原料,在600℃下热解制备生物炭。5年后,与对照相比,只有添加氮(作为矿物肥或作为富营养生物炭)的处理显著增加了基底面积和体积生长。氮肥和生物炭+氮肥处理在时间和影响程度上均无显著差异,但施肥后第3年的年生长量较好,表明无论何种载体,氮素的释放和吸收都较快。纯生物炭不会刺激树木生长。虽然生物炭不会对生长产生负面影响,但在这些条件下,其作为生长刺激剂的直接作用不被支持,至少在短期内,剂量为2.5 t / ha - 1。为了充分了解生物炭在林业中的潜力,需要对不同的林龄、立地类型和施用量进行进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.