High-Value Recycling and Regeneration of Spent LiFePO4 Batteries: Recent Advances, Mechanisms, and Perspectives

IF 4.5 4区 材料科学 Q2 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Ke Chen, Haoran Lang, Dewei Zheng, Bo Zhang, Xuan Zhao, Pengwei Li, Xiaoning Xia, Kai Zhu, Jun Wang, Dianxue Cao
{"title":"High-Value Recycling and Regeneration of Spent LiFePO4 Batteries: Recent Advances, Mechanisms, and Perspectives","authors":"Ke Chen,&nbsp;Haoran Lang,&nbsp;Dewei Zheng,&nbsp;Bo Zhang,&nbsp;Xuan Zhao,&nbsp;Pengwei Li,&nbsp;Xiaoning Xia,&nbsp;Kai Zhu,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Dianxue Cao","doi":"10.1002/batt.70447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapidly growing deployment of electric vehicles and energy storage systems is generating increasing quantities of spent LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP) batteries and creating an urgent need for environmentally sound and economically viable recycling. Compared with Ni- and Co-rich cathodes, spent LFP has a lower intrinsic resource value, which reduces the profitability of conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical routes and limits their suitability for closed-loop utilization. This review summarizes recent advances in the high-value recycling and regeneration of spent LFP batteries, with an emphasis on retirement trends, degradation mechanisms, recycling challenges, and advanced regeneration strategies. Conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recovery routes are first compared in terms of efficiency, cost, environmental burden, and scalability. Recent progress in direct regeneration is then discussed, including lithium replenishment, lattice repair, carbon-coating reconstruction, hydrothermal treatment, and molten-salt-assisted regeneration. Upgraded regeneration strategies, including defect modulation, doping, surface engineering, micro/nanoscale structural optimization, cross-system conversion, and transformation into multifunctional materials, are also highlighted. Finally, key barriers associated with feedstock heterogeneity, impurity control, process economics, environmental sustainability, and industrial standardization are identified. This review provides systematic insights into green, scalable, and value-added recycling pathways for spent LFP batteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":132,"journal":{"name":"Batteries & Supercaps","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Batteries & Supercaps","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/batt.70447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapidly growing deployment of electric vehicles and energy storage systems is generating increasing quantities of spent LiFePO4 (LFP) batteries and creating an urgent need for environmentally sound and economically viable recycling. Compared with Ni- and Co-rich cathodes, spent LFP has a lower intrinsic resource value, which reduces the profitability of conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical routes and limits their suitability for closed-loop utilization. This review summarizes recent advances in the high-value recycling and regeneration of spent LFP batteries, with an emphasis on retirement trends, degradation mechanisms, recycling challenges, and advanced regeneration strategies. Conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recovery routes are first compared in terms of efficiency, cost, environmental burden, and scalability. Recent progress in direct regeneration is then discussed, including lithium replenishment, lattice repair, carbon-coating reconstruction, hydrothermal treatment, and molten-salt-assisted regeneration. Upgraded regeneration strategies, including defect modulation, doping, surface engineering, micro/nanoscale structural optimization, cross-system conversion, and transformation into multifunctional materials, are also highlighted. Finally, key barriers associated with feedstock heterogeneity, impurity control, process economics, environmental sustainability, and industrial standardization are identified. This review provides systematic insights into green, scalable, and value-added recycling pathways for spent LFP batteries.

废旧LiFePO4电池的高价值回收与再生:最新进展、机制与展望
随着电动汽车和储能系统的快速发展,废旧LiFePO4 (LFP)电池的使用量不断增加,迫切需要对环境无害、经济可行的回收利用。与富Ni和富co阴极相比,废LFP具有较低的内在资源价值,这降低了传统火法和湿法工艺的盈利能力,限制了其闭环利用的适用性。本文综述了废旧LFP电池高价值回收和再生的最新进展,重点介绍了退役趋势、降解机制、回收挑战和先进的再生策略。首先从效率、成本、环境负担和可扩展性等方面对传统的火法冶金和湿法冶金回收路线进行了比较。然后讨论了直接再生的最新进展,包括锂补充、晶格修复、碳涂层重建、水热处理和熔盐辅助再生。升级再生策略,包括缺陷调制、掺杂、表面工程、微/纳米结构优化、跨系统转换和向多功能材料的转化。最后,确定了与原料异质性、杂质控制、过程经济、环境可持续性和工业标准化相关的关键障碍。这篇综述为废旧LFP电池的绿色、可扩展和增值回收途径提供了系统的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
223
期刊介绍: Electrochemical energy storage devices play a transformative role in our societies. They have allowed the emergence of portable electronics devices, have triggered the resurgence of electric transportation and constitute key components in smart power grids. Batteries & Supercaps publishes international high-impact experimental and theoretical research on the fundamentals and applications of electrochemical energy storage. We support the scientific community to advance energy efficiency and sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书