Nursing-Led Support Across the Standard Care–Clinical Trial–Standard Care Pathway in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review With Realist-Informed Interpretation

IF 1.6 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2026-08-19 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70458
Daniele Napolitano, Mattia Bozzetti, Vincenzina Mora, Francesco Pastore, Rosario Caruso, Monica Guberti, Valeria Amatucci, Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Lucrezia Laterza, Franco Scaldaferri, Antonio Gasbarrini
{"title":"Nursing-Led Support Across the Standard Care–Clinical Trial–Standard Care Pathway in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review With Realist-Informed Interpretation","authors":"Daniele Napolitano,&nbsp;Mattia Bozzetti,&nbsp;Vincenzina Mora,&nbsp;Francesco Pastore,&nbsp;Rosario Caruso,&nbsp;Monica Guberti,&nbsp;Valeria Amatucci,&nbsp;Loris Riccardo Lopetuso,&nbsp;Lucrezia Laterza,&nbsp;Franco Scaldaferri,&nbsp;Antonio Gasbarrini","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine how nursing-led support may influence engagement, continuity, adherence, retention, and protocol enactment across the standard care–clinical trial–standard care pathway in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>This focused narrative review used selected realist-informed interpretive principles as a conceptual lens to synthesize heterogeneous literature related to IBD clinical trials, specialist and clinical research nursing, placebo and nocebo processes, health literacy, teach-back, telemonitoring, continuity of care, transitions, implementation, and intervention fidelity. Rather than conducting a formal realist review, realist concepts were used to inform the interpretation of how contextual factors, participant reasoning, and implementation conditions may influence nursing-led support across the clinical trial pathway. Literature was identified through iterative searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar, complemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Five interrelated supportive functions emerged across the reviewed literature: expectation-shaping during screening and enrolment; literacy-sensitive education and teach-back; structured hybrid contact and continuity support; transition-sensitive assistance during trial entry, amendment, and exit phases; and governance strategies promoting role clarity, safety, and equity. Nursing-led support appeared most relevant when it helped participants interpret uncertainty, understand protocol expectations, maintain continuity, and navigate vulnerable transitions. These functions may contribute to engagement, adherence, retention, and timely symptom reporting by strengthening trust, self-efficacy, relational continuity, and adherence to practical protocols.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Nursing-led support may represent a potential mechanism-bearing component of IBD clinical trial participation rather than a purely administrative activity. Transition-sensitive, literacy-aware, and continuity-oriented nursing strategies may support safer, more equitable, and more sustainable engagement across increasingly complex clinical trial pathways.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To examine how nursing-led support may influence engagement, continuity, adherence, retention, and protocol enactment across the standard care–clinical trial–standard care pathway in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods and Results

This focused narrative review used selected realist-informed interpretive principles as a conceptual lens to synthesize heterogeneous literature related to IBD clinical trials, specialist and clinical research nursing, placebo and nocebo processes, health literacy, teach-back, telemonitoring, continuity of care, transitions, implementation, and intervention fidelity. Rather than conducting a formal realist review, realist concepts were used to inform the interpretation of how contextual factors, participant reasoning, and implementation conditions may influence nursing-led support across the clinical trial pathway. Literature was identified through iterative searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar, complemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Five interrelated supportive functions emerged across the reviewed literature: expectation-shaping during screening and enrolment; literacy-sensitive education and teach-back; structured hybrid contact and continuity support; transition-sensitive assistance during trial entry, amendment, and exit phases; and governance strategies promoting role clarity, safety, and equity. Nursing-led support appeared most relevant when it helped participants interpret uncertainty, understand protocol expectations, maintain continuity, and navigate vulnerable transitions. These functions may contribute to engagement, adherence, retention, and timely symptom reporting by strengthening trust, self-efficacy, relational continuity, and adherence to practical protocols.

Conclusion

Nursing-led support may represent a potential mechanism-bearing component of IBD clinical trial participation rather than a purely administrative activity. Transition-sensitive, literacy-aware, and continuity-oriented nursing strategies may support safer, more equitable, and more sustainable engagement across increasingly complex clinical trial pathways.

在炎症性肠病的标准护理-临床试验-标准护理途径中,护理主导的支持:现实主义解释的回顾
目的研究护理主导的支持如何影响炎症性肠病(IBD)患者在标准护理-临床试验-标准护理途径中的参与、连续性、依从性、保留和方案制定。方法和结果这篇集中的叙述性综述使用选定的现实主义者知情的解释原则作为概念透镜,综合与IBD临床试验、专家和临床研究护理、安慰剂和反安慰剂过程、健康素养、教学反馈、远程监测、护理连续性、过渡、实施和干预保真度相关的异质文献。与其进行正式的现实主义回顾,我们使用现实主义概念来解释背景因素、参与者推理和实施条件如何影响临床试验途径中护理主导的支持。通过在PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和谷歌Scholar中反复检索文献,并辅以前后引文跟踪。在回顾的文献中出现了五种相互关联的支持功能:筛选和入学期间的期望塑造;扫盲教育和反馈;结构化混合接触和连续性支持;在试验进入、修改和退出阶段提供过渡敏感援助;以及促进角色清晰、安全和公平的治理策略。当护理主导的支持帮助参与者解释不确定性、理解协议期望、保持连续性和引导脆弱的过渡时,它显得最相关。这些功能可以通过加强信任、自我效能、关系连续性和对实际方案的遵守来促进参与、坚持、保留和及时的症状报告。结论护理主导的支持可能代表了IBD临床试验参与的潜在机制,而不是纯粹的行政活动。过渡敏感、识字意识和连续性导向的护理策略可以在日益复杂的临床试验途径中支持更安全、更公平和更可持续的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书