Lower Limb Entheseal Variation in Modern Athletes and an Early Medieval Population: Implications for Activity Reconstruction

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Elena García-Vargas, Jiří Macháček, Ángel Luis Parrado-Gallego, Enrique Alcalá, Víctor Manuel Encinas-Tobajas, Markus Bastir, Vladimír Sládek
{"title":"Lower Limb Entheseal Variation in Modern Athletes and an Early Medieval Population: Implications for Activity Reconstruction","authors":"Elena García-Vargas,&nbsp;Jiří Macháček,&nbsp;Ángel Luis Parrado-Gallego,&nbsp;Enrique Alcalá,&nbsp;Víctor Manuel Encinas-Tobajas,&nbsp;Markus Bastir,&nbsp;Vladimír Sládek","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Entheses are commonly used to infer past activity patterns, yet their interpretation is limited by the combined effects of mechanical loading and intrinsic biological factors. This study addresses this issue by integrating an Early Medieval population from Pohansko (Czechia; 9th–10th centuries CE) with a Spanish modern professional athlete reference sample characterised by well-defined activity regimes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Lower limb entheseal areas of the <i>gluteus medius</i>, <i>gluteus maximus</i>, <i>vasti</i>, <i>gastrocnemius</i>, and <i>soleus</i> muscles were quantified in the archaeological individuals and in Modern Athletes (sprinters, endurance runners, climbers) using 3D modeling and the VERA protocol. Non-adjusted and size-adjusted data were analysed using univariate and multivariate approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Modern Athletes exhibit significantly larger entheseal areas than Pohansko individuals for all muscles except the <i>soleus</i>, supporting the relationship between cumulative mechanical loading and entheseal development. Multivariate analyses differentiate both samples and distinguish locomotor strategies among athletes, with the <i>soleus</i> enthesis contributing most strongly to functional variation. Sexual dimorphism is consistent and male-biased in athletes but variable and enthesis-specific in the Pohansko sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results highlight the potential and limitations of entheseal areas for reconstructing behavioral and functional variation in past populations. In Modern Athletes, only the <i>soleus</i> enthesis distinguished climbers from runners, regardless of sex, but not sprinters from endurance runners. In Pohansko, it displayed marked female–male differences, consistent with a sex-based division of labour. These findings suggest that lower limb entheses differ in their sensitivity to mechanical loading, with the <i>soleus</i> primarily reflecting locomotor loading rather than sex differences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"190 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajpa.70335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Entheses are commonly used to infer past activity patterns, yet their interpretation is limited by the combined effects of mechanical loading and intrinsic biological factors. This study addresses this issue by integrating an Early Medieval population from Pohansko (Czechia; 9th–10th centuries CE) with a Spanish modern professional athlete reference sample characterised by well-defined activity regimes.

Materials and Methods

Lower limb entheseal areas of the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, vasti, gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles were quantified in the archaeological individuals and in Modern Athletes (sprinters, endurance runners, climbers) using 3D modeling and the VERA protocol. Non-adjusted and size-adjusted data were analysed using univariate and multivariate approaches.

Results

Modern Athletes exhibit significantly larger entheseal areas than Pohansko individuals for all muscles except the soleus, supporting the relationship between cumulative mechanical loading and entheseal development. Multivariate analyses differentiate both samples and distinguish locomotor strategies among athletes, with the soleus enthesis contributing most strongly to functional variation. Sexual dimorphism is consistent and male-biased in athletes but variable and enthesis-specific in the Pohansko sample.

Discussion

Our results highlight the potential and limitations of entheseal areas for reconstructing behavioral and functional variation in past populations. In Modern Athletes, only the soleus enthesis distinguished climbers from runners, regardless of sex, but not sprinters from endurance runners. In Pohansko, it displayed marked female–male differences, consistent with a sex-based division of labour. These findings suggest that lower limb entheses differ in their sensitivity to mechanical loading, with the soleus primarily reflecting locomotor loading rather than sex differences.

现代运动员和中世纪早期人群的下肢骨骺变异:对活动重建的影响
结论通常用于推断过去的活动模式,但其解释受到机械载荷和内在生物因素的综合影响。本研究通过将来自波兰斯科(捷克;公元9 - 10世纪)的中世纪早期人群与具有明确运动制度特征的西班牙现代职业运动员参考样本相结合,解决了这一问题。材料和方法采用3D建模和VERA方案对考古个体和现代运动员(短跑运动员、耐力跑运动员、攀岩运动员)的臀中肌、臀大肌、股肌、腓肠肌和比目鱼肌的下肢内隐区进行量化。使用单变量和多变量方法分析未调整和调整大小的数据。结果现代运动员除比罗鱼肌外的所有肌肉都比Pohansko个体表现出更大的肌腱面积,支持累积机械负荷与肌腱发育之间的关系。多变量分析区分了这两个样本,并区分了运动员的运动策略,其中比目鱼尾肌对功能变化的贡献最大。性别二态性在运动员中是一致的和男性偏向的,但在Pohansko样本中是可变的和特异性的。我们的研究结果强调了在重建过去种群的行为和功能变异方面的潜力和局限性。在《现代运动员》中,攀岩者和跑步者不分性别,只有束尾比目鱼肌可以区分,但短跑运动员和耐力运动员却没有区别。在波汉斯科,它显示出明显的男女差异,与基于性别的劳动分工一致。这些发现表明下肢关节对机械负荷的敏感性存在差异,比目鱼肌主要反映运动负荷而非性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书