Assessment and Treatment of Anxious Avoidant Responses to Auditory Stimuli via Physiological and Behavioral Methodologies

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Andrew W. Gardner, Sarah A. Weddle, Matthew J. Yaggie, Christina Anguiano, Alex Davidson, Carolyn Tureaud
{"title":"Assessment and Treatment of Anxious Avoidant Responses to Auditory Stimuli via Physiological and Behavioral Methodologies","authors":"Andrew W. Gardner,&nbsp;Sarah A. Weddle,&nbsp;Matthew J. Yaggie,&nbsp;Christina Anguiano,&nbsp;Alex Davidson,&nbsp;Carolyn Tureaud","doi":"10.1002/bin.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Avoidance of specific sensory stimuli is commonly reported in autistic individuals, which can significantly impact functioning. In practice, clinicians often rely on dubious therapies for treatment of avoidant responses (e.g., sensory integration therapy). Methodologically, clinicians and researchers have relied solely on direct observations to identify the assumed stimuli and associated overt concerning behavior via single-case designs and verbal reports, as internal responding is often difficult to objectively measure. The current study examined the anxious avoidant responses to auditory stimuli and the associated concerning behavior of a 13-year-old male diagnosed with ASD, specifically to sounds of food consumption. An antecedent analysis was conducted alongside a treatment analysis using both direct behavioral observation and galvanic skin response to measure both overt behavioral and autonomic responding. Treatment analysis resulted in reductions in both concerning behavior (68% reduction) and autonomic nervous system activation (47% reduction) with implementation of a behaviorally based intervention package combining progressive relaxation training with competing preferred activities. The convergent validity between behavioral and physiological measures supports the integration of objective physiological measurement with traditional behavioral assessment methods.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoidance of specific sensory stimuli is commonly reported in autistic individuals, which can significantly impact functioning. In practice, clinicians often rely on dubious therapies for treatment of avoidant responses (e.g., sensory integration therapy). Methodologically, clinicians and researchers have relied solely on direct observations to identify the assumed stimuli and associated overt concerning behavior via single-case designs and verbal reports, as internal responding is often difficult to objectively measure. The current study examined the anxious avoidant responses to auditory stimuli and the associated concerning behavior of a 13-year-old male diagnosed with ASD, specifically to sounds of food consumption. An antecedent analysis was conducted alongside a treatment analysis using both direct behavioral observation and galvanic skin response to measure both overt behavioral and autonomic responding. Treatment analysis resulted in reductions in both concerning behavior (68% reduction) and autonomic nervous system activation (47% reduction) with implementation of a behaviorally based intervention package combining progressive relaxation training with competing preferred activities. The convergent validity between behavioral and physiological measures supports the integration of objective physiological measurement with traditional behavioral assessment methods.

通过生理和行为方法评估和治疗对听觉刺激的焦虑回避反应
对特定感官刺激的回避在自闭症患者中普遍存在,这可能会严重影响功能。在实践中,临床医生经常依赖于可疑的疗法来治疗回避反应(例如,感觉统合疗法)。在方法上,临床医生和研究人员完全依赖于直接观察,通过单例设计和口头报告来识别假设的刺激和相关的显性行为,因为内部反应通常难以客观测量。目前的研究检查了一名13岁被诊断为ASD的男性对听觉刺激的焦虑回避反应和相关行为,特别是对食物消耗的声音。前因分析与治疗分析同时进行,使用直接行为观察和皮肤电反应来测量显性行为和自主反应。治疗分析表明,通过实施基于行为的干预方案,将渐进式放松训练与竞争性首选活动相结合,相关行为(减少68%)和自主神经系统激活(减少47%)均有所减少。行为和生理测量的趋同效度支持了客观生理测量与传统行为评估方法的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书