From Nostalgia to Noir: AI and the Genre Fluidity in Ruskin Bond’s Works

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Padmasri Bodi, Prasanna Lakshmi Narra
{"title":"From Nostalgia to Noir: AI and the Genre Fluidity in Ruskin Bond’s Works","authors":"Padmasri Bodi,&nbsp;Prasanna Lakshmi Narra","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/1477133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in literature has sparked ethical debates on creativity, authorship, and human interpretation. AI-driven tools increasingly shape literary analysis, creative writing, and textual interpretation, raising concerns about bias, loss of emotional depth, and ethical governance. As AI becomes more embedded in humanities research, a responsible framework for ethical AI development is essential. This paper explores the intersection of Buddhist philosophy, scientific inquiry and AI ethics in literature, proposing that Buddhist principles mindfulness (sati), wisdom (prajna) and ethical conduct (sila) offer a valuable foundation for addressing these challenges. Drawing from Buddhist epistemology, this study examines how scientific inquiry and AI ethics benefit from mindfulness-based decision-making, emphasizing human oversight in AI-driven literary analysis. It explores Buddhist thought’s role in fostering responsible AI development, compassion-driven technological progress, and ensuring AI serves as an augmentation tool rather than a replacement. Additionally, it analyzes Ruskin Bond’s works through a Buddhist lens, highlighting his meditative storytelling, ecological consciousness and themes of mindfulness, impermanence and simplicity. Bond’s evocative prose, capturing the transient beauty of nature and human experience, raises a critical question: Can AI truly replicate the mindfulness inherent in human literary expression? By integrating literature, philosophy and AI ethics, this study argues that Buddhist ethical principles provide a guiding framework for AI governance in humanities research. It advocates for a balanced AI–human collaboration one that respects cultural, ethical and intellectual literary traditions while leveraging AI’s analytical strengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/1477133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/1477133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in literature has sparked ethical debates on creativity, authorship, and human interpretation. AI-driven tools increasingly shape literary analysis, creative writing, and textual interpretation, raising concerns about bias, loss of emotional depth, and ethical governance. As AI becomes more embedded in humanities research, a responsible framework for ethical AI development is essential. This paper explores the intersection of Buddhist philosophy, scientific inquiry and AI ethics in literature, proposing that Buddhist principles mindfulness (sati), wisdom (prajna) and ethical conduct (sila) offer a valuable foundation for addressing these challenges. Drawing from Buddhist epistemology, this study examines how scientific inquiry and AI ethics benefit from mindfulness-based decision-making, emphasizing human oversight in AI-driven literary analysis. It explores Buddhist thought’s role in fostering responsible AI development, compassion-driven technological progress, and ensuring AI serves as an augmentation tool rather than a replacement. Additionally, it analyzes Ruskin Bond’s works through a Buddhist lens, highlighting his meditative storytelling, ecological consciousness and themes of mindfulness, impermanence and simplicity. Bond’s evocative prose, capturing the transient beauty of nature and human experience, raises a critical question: Can AI truly replicate the mindfulness inherent in human literary expression? By integrating literature, philosophy and AI ethics, this study argues that Buddhist ethical principles provide a guiding framework for AI governance in humanities research. It advocates for a balanced AI–human collaboration one that respects cultural, ethical and intellectual literary traditions while leveraging AI’s analytical strengths.

从怀旧到黑色:罗斯金·邦德作品中的人工智能和体裁流动性
人工智能(AI)在文学领域的迅速发展引发了关于创造力、作者身份和人类解读的伦理争论。人工智能驱动的工具越来越多地影响文学分析、创意写作和文本解释,引发了对偏见、情感深度丧失和伦理治理的担忧。随着人工智能越来越多地融入人文科学研究,一个负责任的人工智能伦理发展框架至关重要。本文探讨了佛教哲学、科学探究和文学中人工智能伦理的交集,提出佛教原则正念(sati)、智慧(般若)和道德行为(sila)为应对这些挑战提供了宝贵的基础。从佛教认识论出发,本研究考察了科学探究和人工智能伦理如何受益于基于正念的决策,强调了人工智能驱动的文学分析中的人类监督。它探讨了佛教思想在促进负责任的人工智能发展、慈悲驱动的技术进步以及确保人工智能作为一种增强工具而不是替代品方面的作用。此外,本文还从佛教的角度分析了罗斯金·邦德的作品,突出了他的冥想叙事、生态意识以及正念、无常和简单的主题。邦德令人回味的散文捕捉了自然和人类经历的短暂之美,提出了一个关键问题:人工智能真的能复制人类文学表达中固有的专注力吗?本研究通过整合文学、哲学和人工智能伦理,认为佛教伦理原则为人文学科研究中的人工智能治理提供了指导框架。它倡导平衡的人工智能与人类的合作,尊重文化、伦理和知识文学传统,同时利用人工智能的分析优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书