Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Forensic Psychology: An Umbrella Review of Potentials and Pitfalls

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ysabel A. Guevarra, Eva M. Hisham, Andree Hartanto
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Forensic Psychology: An Umbrella Review of Potentials and Pitfalls","authors":"Ysabel A. Guevarra,&nbsp;Eva M. Hisham,&nbsp;Andree Hartanto","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/6547352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly embedded within forensic psychological practice, shaping how criminal risk, legal responsibility and public safety are assessed. AI tools are now used in recidivism prediction, behavioural analysis, deception detection and investigative support, high-stakes domains where errors can have profound consequences. Despite this rapid adoption, the existing literature remains fragmented, with most reviews confined to narrow subdomains and offering limited integrated synthesis of AI′s broader role in forensic psychology. Thus, this umbrella review addresses this gap by synthesising findings from 43 reviews obtained from five major databases, namely EBSCOhost ERIC, EBSCOhost PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Across the reviewed literature, our umbrella review suggests that AI is positioned as offering several potential benefits for forensic psychological work, including improved predictive accuracy, real-time threat monitoring, more optimised resource allocation, enhanced analysis of complex behavioural data and more objective decision-making. At the same time, the present review highlights persistent pitfalls that may constrain the reliability and defensibility of current applications. These include the reinforcement of bias and disparities, limited transparency and explainability, over-reliance that may undermine human judgement, data constraints and overfitting, ethical and legal risks and substantial implementation and computational demands that may inhibit real-world application. Overall, this review underscores the need for rigorous safeguards to ensure that AI enhances rather than compromises forensic decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/6547352","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/6547352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly embedded within forensic psychological practice, shaping how criminal risk, legal responsibility and public safety are assessed. AI tools are now used in recidivism prediction, behavioural analysis, deception detection and investigative support, high-stakes domains where errors can have profound consequences. Despite this rapid adoption, the existing literature remains fragmented, with most reviews confined to narrow subdomains and offering limited integrated synthesis of AI′s broader role in forensic psychology. Thus, this umbrella review addresses this gap by synthesising findings from 43 reviews obtained from five major databases, namely EBSCOhost ERIC, EBSCOhost PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Across the reviewed literature, our umbrella review suggests that AI is positioned as offering several potential benefits for forensic psychological work, including improved predictive accuracy, real-time threat monitoring, more optimised resource allocation, enhanced analysis of complex behavioural data and more objective decision-making. At the same time, the present review highlights persistent pitfalls that may constrain the reliability and defensibility of current applications. These include the reinforcement of bias and disparities, limited transparency and explainability, over-reliance that may undermine human judgement, data constraints and overfitting, ethical and legal risks and substantial implementation and computational demands that may inhibit real-world application. Overall, this review underscores the need for rigorous safeguards to ensure that AI enhances rather than compromises forensic decision-making.

人工智能(AI)在法医心理学:潜力和缺陷的综合回顾
人工智能(AI)正越来越多地融入法医心理学实践,影响着犯罪风险、法律责任和公共安全的评估方式。人工智能工具现在被用于累犯预测、行为分析、欺骗检测和调查支持,以及错误可能产生深远后果的高风险领域。尽管人工智能被迅速采用,但现有的文献仍然是碎片化的,大多数评论都局限于狭窄的子领域,对人工智能在法医心理学中更广泛的作用提供了有限的综合综合。因此,这一总括性综述通过综合从五个主要数据库(EBSCOhost ERIC、EBSCOhost PsycInfo、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)获得的43篇综述的发现来解决这一差距。纵观所回顾的文献,我们的总体性综述表明,人工智能被定位为为法医心理工作提供几个潜在的好处,包括提高预测准确性、实时威胁监控、更优化的资源分配、增强复杂行为数据的分析和更客观的决策。同时,本综述强调了可能限制当前应用的可靠性和可防御性的持续缺陷。这些问题包括偏见和差异的加剧、有限的透明度和可解释性、可能破坏人类判断的过度依赖、数据约束和过度拟合、道德和法律风险以及可能抑制现实世界应用的大量实施和计算需求。总的来说,这一审查强调了严格的保障措施的必要性,以确保人工智能增强而不是损害法医决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书