Aboveground biomass estimations in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Michael Stanley Peprah
{"title":"Aboveground biomass estimations in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Michael Stanley Peprah","doi":"10.1007/s12517-026-12570-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate estimation of Aboveground Biomass (AGB) is essential for climate change mitigation, sustainable forest management, carbon accounting, and the implementation of REDD + and Paris Agreement commitments. Across Africa, particularly in Ghana, AGB estimation is constrained by limited field data, methodological inconsistencies, and reliance on generalized allometric models, often resulting in errors exceeding 20–35%. Although remote sensing technologies, including optical, radar, and LiDAR systems, provide scalable alternatives for biomass monitoring, their effectiveness is often limited by sensor saturation, persistent cloud cover, calibration uncertainties, and inadequate ground validation data. Ghana faces additional challenges due to its heterogeneous forest–savanna mosaic, rapid land-use conversion driven by cocoa expansion, and a scarcity of locally calibrated allometric equations and high-resolution LiDAR datasets. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework to systematically review and meta-analyse 74 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025. Field-based, remote sensing, and integrated approaches for AGB estimation across African biomes were evaluated, with particular emphasis on Ghana. Accuracy indicators, including coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative error, were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analytic model. Results indicate that field-based methods provide high precision but limited spatial scalability. LiDAR and L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) improve large-scale biomass estimation when combined with field calibration. Integrated approaches achieved the highest accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78); among Ghana-specific studies, mean accuracy was R<sup>2</sup> = 0.74 (RMSE = 27.1 Mg ha⁻¹). The findings highlight the need for standardized methodologies, regionally calibrated allometric models, robust ground-truth networks, and multi-sensor integration to improve AGB estimation and support evidence-based climate and forest management policies across Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"19 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-026-12570-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of Aboveground Biomass (AGB) is essential for climate change mitigation, sustainable forest management, carbon accounting, and the implementation of REDD + and Paris Agreement commitments. Across Africa, particularly in Ghana, AGB estimation is constrained by limited field data, methodological inconsistencies, and reliance on generalized allometric models, often resulting in errors exceeding 20–35%. Although remote sensing technologies, including optical, radar, and LiDAR systems, provide scalable alternatives for biomass monitoring, their effectiveness is often limited by sensor saturation, persistent cloud cover, calibration uncertainties, and inadequate ground validation data. Ghana faces additional challenges due to its heterogeneous forest–savanna mosaic, rapid land-use conversion driven by cocoa expansion, and a scarcity of locally calibrated allometric equations and high-resolution LiDAR datasets. This study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework to systematically review and meta-analyse 74 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025. Field-based, remote sensing, and integrated approaches for AGB estimation across African biomes were evaluated, with particular emphasis on Ghana. Accuracy indicators, including coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative error, were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analytic model. Results indicate that field-based methods provide high precision but limited spatial scalability. LiDAR and L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) improve large-scale biomass estimation when combined with field calibration. Integrated approaches achieved the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.78); among Ghana-specific studies, mean accuracy was R2 = 0.74 (RMSE = 27.1 Mg ha⁻¹). The findings highlight the need for standardized methodologies, regionally calibrated allometric models, robust ground-truth networks, and multi-sensor integration to improve AGB estimation and support evidence-based climate and forest management policies across Africa.

非洲地上生物量估算:系统综述和荟萃分析
准确估算地上生物量(AGB)对于减缓气候变化、可持续森林管理、碳核算以及实施REDD +和《巴黎协定》承诺至关重要。在整个非洲,特别是在加纳,AGB估计受到有限的现场数据、方法不一致以及对广义异速生长模型的依赖的限制,通常导致误差超过20-35%。尽管包括光学、雷达和激光雷达系统在内的遥感技术为生物质监测提供了可扩展的替代方案,但它们的有效性往往受到传感器饱和度、持续云层覆盖、校准不确定性和地面验证数据不足的限制。由于多样化的森林-稀树草原马赛克、可可扩张推动的土地利用快速转换,以及缺乏本地校准的异速生长方程和高分辨率激光雷达数据集,加纳面临着额外的挑战。本研究采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)框架对2000年至2025年间发表的74项同行评议研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。评估了基于实地、遥感和综合的非洲生物群落AGB估计方法,特别强调了加纳。准确度指标包括决定系数(R²)、均方根误差(RMSE)和相对误差,采用随机效应荟萃分析模型进行综合。结果表明,基于字段的方法精度高,但空间可扩展性有限。激光雷达(LiDAR)和l波段合成孔径雷达(SAR)与野外标定相结合,提高了大规模生物量估算。综合方法的准确率最高(R2 = 0.78);在针对加纳的研究中,平均准确度为R2 = 0.74 (RMSE = 27.1 Mg ha⁻¹)。研究结果强调需要标准化的方法、区域校准的异速生长模型、可靠的地面真值网络和多传感器集成来改进AGB估算并支持全非洲基于证据的气候和森林管理政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书