A Swanson’s caring theory–based intervention to reduce infertility-related stress and improve coping strategies in women and their partners undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART): a randomized controlled trial

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Bilgesu Arslan, Serap Temiz
{"title":"A Swanson’s caring theory–based intervention to reduce infertility-related stress and improve coping strategies in women and their partners undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART): a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Bilgesu Arslan,&nbsp;Serap Temiz","doi":"10.1007/s00737-026-01750-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a supportive care intervention based on Swanson’s Caring Theory on infertility-related stress and coping strategies among women and their partners undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 couples undergoing ART at the IVF Center of Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center, Türkiye. Couples were randomly assigned to either the intervention group receiving Swanson’s Caring Theory–based supportive care or the control group receiving routine care. Data were collected at baseline prior to treatment initiation (T1), pre–embryo transfer (T2), and one month following embryo transfer (T3). Infertility-related stress and coping strategies were assessed using the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and the COMPI Coping Strategy Scales. Repeated-measures ANOVA and t tests were used for analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with controls, women and men in the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in infertility-related stress scores from T1 to T2 (all <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Significant group × time interactions were also identified for active coping, meaning-based coping, active-avoidance coping, and passive-avoidance coping among both women and men (all <i>p</i> ≤ .010). Active coping and meaning-based coping increased over time in the intervention group, whereas passive-avoidance coping also increased during the active treatment phase. Exploratory analyses among participants with unsuccessful ART outcomes indicated lower infertility-related stress scores in the intervention group at T3. Women in the intervention group also reported lower active-avoidance coping scores, whereas both women and men reported higher active coping and meaning-based coping scores. Passive-avoidance coping scores decreased from T2 to T3 among intervention participants with unsuccessful ART outcomes.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Supportive care grounded in Swanson’s Caring Theory may reduce infertility-related stress and influence coping responses among couples undergoing ART treatment. Although increases were observed in active and meaning-based coping, coping patterns were not uniformly adaptive across all domains and treatment stages. The findings support the potential value of integrating structured supportive care into routine IVF services; however, exploratory findings related to unsuccessful ART outcomes should be interpreted with caution.</p><p>Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07557069 (retrospectively registered).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"29 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00737-026-01750-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a supportive care intervention based on Swanson’s Caring Theory on infertility-related stress and coping strategies among women and their partners undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART).

Methods

This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 couples undergoing ART at the IVF Center of Ondokuz Mayıs University Health Practice and Research Center, Türkiye. Couples were randomly assigned to either the intervention group receiving Swanson’s Caring Theory–based supportive care or the control group receiving routine care. Data were collected at baseline prior to treatment initiation (T1), pre–embryo transfer (T2), and one month following embryo transfer (T3). Infertility-related stress and coping strategies were assessed using the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and the COMPI Coping Strategy Scales. Repeated-measures ANOVA and t tests were used for analyses.

Results

Compared with controls, women and men in the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in infertility-related stress scores from T1 to T2 (all p < .001). Significant group × time interactions were also identified for active coping, meaning-based coping, active-avoidance coping, and passive-avoidance coping among both women and men (all p ≤ .010). Active coping and meaning-based coping increased over time in the intervention group, whereas passive-avoidance coping also increased during the active treatment phase. Exploratory analyses among participants with unsuccessful ART outcomes indicated lower infertility-related stress scores in the intervention group at T3. Women in the intervention group also reported lower active-avoidance coping scores, whereas both women and men reported higher active coping and meaning-based coping scores. Passive-avoidance coping scores decreased from T2 to T3 among intervention participants with unsuccessful ART outcomes.

Conclusion

Supportive care grounded in Swanson’s Caring Theory may reduce infertility-related stress and influence coping responses among couples undergoing ART treatment. Although increases were observed in active and meaning-based coping, coping patterns were not uniformly adaptive across all domains and treatment stages. The findings support the potential value of integrating structured supportive care into routine IVF services; however, exploratory findings related to unsuccessful ART outcomes should be interpreted with caution.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07557069 (retrospectively registered).

一项基于Swanson关爱理论的干预以减少不孕相关压力并改善辅助生殖治疗(ART)妇女及其伴侣的应对策略:一项随机对照试验
目的本研究旨在评估基于Swanson关爱理论的支持性护理干预对辅助生殖治疗(ART)妇女及其伴侣不孕相关压力及应对策略的影响。方法采用单盲随机对照试验方法,对100对在日本国立大学卫生实践与研究中心Ondokuz IVF中心接受ART治疗的夫妇进行研究。夫妇被随机分配到接受斯旺森基于关怀理论的支持性护理的干预组或接受常规护理的对照组。在治疗开始前(T1)、胚胎移植前(T2)和胚胎移植后一个月(T3)收集基线数据。使用COMPI生育问题压力量表和COMPI应对策略量表评估不孕相关压力和应对策略。采用重复测量方差分析和t检验进行分析。结果与对照组相比,干预组的女性和男性从T1到T2的不孕相关压力评分明显降低(p < 0.001)。男女在主动应对、基于意义的应对、主动回避应对和被动回避应对方面也存在显著的组时间交互作用(p≤0.010)。干预组的主动应对和基于意义的应对随着时间的推移而增加,而被动回避应对在积极治疗阶段也有所增加。在ART治疗不成功的参与者中进行的探索性分析表明,干预组在T3时的不孕相关压力评分较低。干预组的女性也报告了较低的主动回避应对得分,而女性和男性都报告了较高的主动应对和基于意义的应对得分。在抗逆转录病毒治疗结果不成功的干预参与者中,被动回避应对得分从T2降至T3。结论基于Swanson关爱理论的支持性护理可降低接受ART治疗夫妇的不孕相关压力并影响其应对反应。尽管积极应对和基于意义的应对有所增加,但应对模式在所有领域和治疗阶段的适应性并不一致。研究结果支持将结构化支持性护理纳入常规试管婴儿服务的潜在价值;然而,与不成功的ART结果相关的探索性发现应谨慎解释。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07557069(回顾性注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Archives of Women's Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Women’s Mental Health is the official journal of the International Association for Women''s Mental Health, Marcé Society and the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology (NASPOG). The exchange of knowledge between psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists is one of the major aims of the journal. Its international scope includes psychodynamics, social and biological aspects of all psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in women. The editors especially welcome interdisciplinary studies, focussing on the interface between psychiatry, psychosomatics, obstetrics and gynecology. Archives of Women’s Mental Health publishes rigorously reviewed research papers, short communications, case reports, review articles, invited editorials, historical perspectives, book reviews, letters to the editor, as well as conference abstracts. Only contributions written in English will be accepted. The journal assists clinicians, teachers and researchers to incorporate knowledge of all aspects of women’s mental health into current and future clinical care and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书