Dimensional and Categorical Approaches to the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder in Children

W O SHEKIM M.D., D P CANTWELL M.D., J KASHANI M.D., N BECK M.D., J MARTIN M.A., J ROSENBERG M.Sc.
{"title":"Dimensional and Categorical Approaches to the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder in Children","authors":"W O SHEKIM M.D.,&nbsp;D P CANTWELL M.D.,&nbsp;J KASHANI M.D.,&nbsp;N BECK M.D.,&nbsp;J MARTIN M.A.,&nbsp;J ROSENBERG M.Sc.","doi":"10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60290-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The authors compared two approach methods for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) in a sample of 114 9-year-old children in the community. One method was the categorical approach using a structured interview of parents about their children <em>(DISC-P)</em> and the other was the dimensional approach using Achenbach's Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) filled in by the parents. There were 14 children diagnosed as having ADDH by DISC-P. Of these, two were “diagnosed” by CBCL. The children diagnosed as ADDH by DISC-P differed on the Achenbach's Externalizing factors from the children who did not have any DSM-III diagnosis by DISC-P and from those who had other DSM-III diagnoses; and on the Achenbach's Internalizing Factors they only differed from the children with no diagnosis and not from children with other diagnoses. Finally it is concluded that it is unlikely that a single cut-off score on any rating scale will be an adequate substitute for a systemic evaluation using several data sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76025,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 653-658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60290-9","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002713809602909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

The authors compared two approach methods for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) in a sample of 114 9-year-old children in the community. One method was the categorical approach using a structured interview of parents about their children (DISC-P) and the other was the dimensional approach using Achenbach's Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) filled in by the parents. There were 14 children diagnosed as having ADDH by DISC-P. Of these, two were “diagnosed” by CBCL. The children diagnosed as ADDH by DISC-P differed on the Achenbach's Externalizing factors from the children who did not have any DSM-III diagnosis by DISC-P and from those who had other DSM-III diagnoses; and on the Achenbach's Internalizing Factors they only differed from the children with no diagnosis and not from children with other diagnoses. Finally it is concluded that it is unlikely that a single cut-off score on any rating scale will be an adequate substitute for a systemic evaluation using several data sources.

儿童注意缺陷障碍诊断的维度与分类方法
作者比较了两种诊断注意力缺陷障碍伴多动(ADDH)的方法,样本为114名社区的9岁儿童。一种方法是分类法,采用父母对孩子的结构化访谈(DISC-P);另一种方法是维度法,使用父母填写的阿肯巴赫儿童行为检查表(CBCL)。通过DISC-P诊断为adhd的患儿有14例。其中2例被CBCL“诊断”。经DISC-P诊断为adhd的儿童与未经DISC-P诊断为adhd的儿童和经其他诊断为adhd的儿童在阿肯巴赫外化因素上存在差异;在阿肯巴赫内化因素上,他们只与没有诊断的孩子不同,与有其他诊断的孩子没有区别。最后得出的结论是,任何评级量表上的单一截止分数都不太可能充分取代使用几个数据源的系统评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信