{"title":"Efficacy of advanced treatment modalities of dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Vrinda Saxena, Saina Shoukath, Payal Saxena, Suruchi Jatol-Tekade, Sweta M. Kumari, Kiran Bachani, Shivam Kamthan","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a prevalent clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentin in response to thermal, tactile, osmotic, or chemical stimuli. Conventional desensitizing agents often provide temporary relief, with inconsistent long-term effectiveness, prompting growing interest in advanced treatment modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy of advanced treatment modalities with conventional or placebo interventions in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420250651753). Electronic searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar, with the date of final search being 30 September 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity affecting permanent teeth were included. Advanced interventions such as laser therapy, photobiomodulation, bioactive glass, nano-hydroxyapatite, CPP-ACP, iontophoresis, Resin and varnish systems, were assessed. The primary outcome was reduction in hypersensitivity measured using validated pain assessment scales. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and quantitative synthesis was performed using a RevMan 5.4. software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis, and twenty-five studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Advanced treatment modalities demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in dentin hypersensitivity compared with conventional or placebo controls (pooled SMD = −1.02; 95% CI: −1.32 to −0.73; p < 0.001). Laser-based therapies showed the greatest effectiveness, followed by nano-hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass agents. Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Advanced treatment modalities are more effective than conventional desensitizing agents in managing dentin hypersensitivity. Laser therapy provides the most consistent and sustained relief, supporting its clinical use, while further standardized long-term trials are recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"16 4","pages":"Article 101500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426826001120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a prevalent clinical condition characterized by short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentin in response to thermal, tactile, osmotic, or chemical stimuli. Conventional desensitizing agents often provide temporary relief, with inconsistent long-term effectiveness, prompting growing interest in advanced treatment modalities.
Objective
To systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy of advanced treatment modalities with conventional or placebo interventions in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in adults.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420250651753). Electronic searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar, with the date of final search being 30 September 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving adults with clinically diagnosed dentin hypersensitivity affecting permanent teeth were included. Advanced interventions such as laser therapy, photobiomodulation, bioactive glass, nano-hydroxyapatite, CPP-ACP, iontophoresis, Resin and varnish systems, were assessed. The primary outcome was reduction in hypersensitivity measured using validated pain assessment scales. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and quantitative synthesis was performed using a RevMan 5.4. software.
Results
Thirty-one randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis, and twenty-five studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Advanced treatment modalities demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in dentin hypersensitivity compared with conventional or placebo controls (pooled SMD = −1.02; 95% CI: −1.32 to −0.73; p < 0.001). Laser-based therapies showed the greatest effectiveness, followed by nano-hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass agents. Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies.
Conclusion
Advanced treatment modalities are more effective than conventional desensitizing agents in managing dentin hypersensitivity. Laser therapy provides the most consistent and sustained relief, supporting its clinical use, while further standardized long-term trials are recommended.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.