Emotional reactivity to delayed replies: Temporal dynamics, context, and age differences

IF 5.5 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101261
Yuuki Kato, Shogo Kato
{"title":"Emotional reactivity to delayed replies: Temporal dynamics, context, and age differences","authors":"Yuuki Kato,&nbsp;Shogo Kato","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how reply latency in digital messaging shapes emotional experience is essential for designing inclusive and emotionally intelligent communication environments. Drawing on chronemics and Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (SST), this study examines how the occurrence and anticipated onset latency of negative emotions vary across relational contexts, user roles, message visibility, emotion types, and age. A large-scale online survey (N = 2367; ages 15–59) used ecologically valid messaging scenarios on LINE—a platform functionally similar to WhatsApp and other global services—to assess both whether and when participants anticipated negative emotions (anxiety, sadness, anger, guilt) would emerge in response to delayed replies. Binary and ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed that reply latency increased the likelihood of anticipated negative emotions, with anxiety reported as the earliest and most frequent response. Anticipated emotional onset was earlier when messages were read and in parent contexts, and role-related patterns indicated accelerated guilt among those delaying replies. Nonlinear age patterns showed heightened sensitivity among younger users and attenuated responses with age. These findings highlight reply latency as a temporally structured and context-dependent cue shaped by relational and generational contexts. Theoretically, this study advances chronemics and socioemotional communication research by reconceptualizing reply latency as a temporally structured socioemotional signal and by explicitly distinguishing emotional occurrence from anticipated onset timing. Practically, it informs platform design and digital literacy initiatives aimed at fostering more inclusive, intergenerationally attuned communication environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101261"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958826003350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how reply latency in digital messaging shapes emotional experience is essential for designing inclusive and emotionally intelligent communication environments. Drawing on chronemics and Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (SST), this study examines how the occurrence and anticipated onset latency of negative emotions vary across relational contexts, user roles, message visibility, emotion types, and age. A large-scale online survey (N = 2367; ages 15–59) used ecologically valid messaging scenarios on LINE—a platform functionally similar to WhatsApp and other global services—to assess both whether and when participants anticipated negative emotions (anxiety, sadness, anger, guilt) would emerge in response to delayed replies. Binary and ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed that reply latency increased the likelihood of anticipated negative emotions, with anxiety reported as the earliest and most frequent response. Anticipated emotional onset was earlier when messages were read and in parent contexts, and role-related patterns indicated accelerated guilt among those delaying replies. Nonlinear age patterns showed heightened sensitivity among younger users and attenuated responses with age. These findings highlight reply latency as a temporally structured and context-dependent cue shaped by relational and generational contexts. Theoretically, this study advances chronemics and socioemotional communication research by reconceptualizing reply latency as a temporally structured socioemotional signal and by explicitly distinguishing emotional occurrence from anticipated onset timing. Practically, it informs platform design and digital literacy initiatives aimed at fostering more inclusive, intergenerationally attuned communication environments.
对延迟答复的情绪反应:时间动态、背景和年龄差异
了解数字信息中的回复延迟如何影响情感体验,对于设计包容性和情商高的沟通环境至关重要。利用时间学和社会情绪选择性理论(SST),本研究考察了负面情绪的发生和预期发作潜伏期在关系背景、用户角色、信息可见性、情绪类型和年龄之间的差异。一项大规模的在线调查(N = 2367;年龄15-59岁)使用line(一个功能类似WhatsApp和其他全球服务的平台)上生态有效的消息传递场景来评估参与者是否以及何时预期负面情绪(焦虑、悲伤、愤怒、内疚)会因延迟回复而出现。二元和有序逻辑回归分析显示,回复延迟增加了预期负面情绪的可能性,焦虑是最早和最常见的反应。当阅读信息时,以及在父母的环境下,预期的情绪发作更早,角色相关的模式表明,那些延迟回复的人会加速内疚。非线性年龄模式表明,年轻用户的敏感性提高,随着年龄的增长反应减弱。这些发现强调了回复延迟是一种时间结构和上下文相关的线索,由关系和代际上下文形成。从理论上讲,本研究通过将回复延迟重新定义为一种时间结构的社会情绪信号,并明确区分情绪发生与预期发生时间,从而推进了时间学和社会情绪沟通研究。实际上,它为平台设计和数字扫盲倡议提供了信息,旨在培养更具包容性、代际协调的交流环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书