Relationship-specific patterns of bodily access extend to digitally mediated touch

IF 5.5 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101266
Roberto Montano, Orestis Georgiou, William Frier, Patrick Haggard, Patricia Cornelio
{"title":"Relationship-specific patterns of bodily access extend to digitally mediated touch","authors":"Roberto Montano,&nbsp;Orestis Georgiou,&nbsp;William Frier,&nbsp;Patrick Haggard,&nbsp;Patricia Cornelio","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social touch is shaped by relationship closeness and culturally influenced boundaries. However, emerging digital systems are reshaping how touch can be experienced, enabling touch-like sensations to be delivered remotely via robotic, wearable, and contactless interfaces. Yet, it remains unclear whether relationship-dependent patterns of touch permissibility observed in everyday life also extend to technology-mediated touch. In an online body-mapping study, 147 participants from six countries rated emotional bond toward multiple social-network members and an AI agent and indicated which body regions they would allow each target to touch across physical and three technology-mediated modalities. Across modalities, emotional bond robustly predicted a touchability index derived from the mapped body areas, indicating a consistent positive association between relationship closeness and touch permissibility even when tactile sensations are technologically delivered. This relationship-dependent pattern was observed across countries, alongside cross-cultural differences in baseline permissiveness and gradient strength. Touch-allowed maps further showed that mediated modalities exhibited spatial patterns broadly similar to those observed in physical touch, with closer network members granted access to broader and more intimate regions, and distant ties largely restricted to distal, socially neutral areas. AI agents were permitted greater bodily access than human strangers but exhibited weaker bond dependence and were more strongly associated with pragmatic than affective motives for touch. Together, these findings suggest that technology-mediated touch may be interpreted through existing relationship-dependent expectations governing bodily boundaries, rather than constituting a fully distinct category of digital interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101266"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958826003404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social touch is shaped by relationship closeness and culturally influenced boundaries. However, emerging digital systems are reshaping how touch can be experienced, enabling touch-like sensations to be delivered remotely via robotic, wearable, and contactless interfaces. Yet, it remains unclear whether relationship-dependent patterns of touch permissibility observed in everyday life also extend to technology-mediated touch. In an online body-mapping study, 147 participants from six countries rated emotional bond toward multiple social-network members and an AI agent and indicated which body regions they would allow each target to touch across physical and three technology-mediated modalities. Across modalities, emotional bond robustly predicted a touchability index derived from the mapped body areas, indicating a consistent positive association between relationship closeness and touch permissibility even when tactile sensations are technologically delivered. This relationship-dependent pattern was observed across countries, alongside cross-cultural differences in baseline permissiveness and gradient strength. Touch-allowed maps further showed that mediated modalities exhibited spatial patterns broadly similar to those observed in physical touch, with closer network members granted access to broader and more intimate regions, and distant ties largely restricted to distal, socially neutral areas. AI agents were permitted greater bodily access than human strangers but exhibited weaker bond dependence and were more strongly associated with pragmatic than affective motives for touch. Together, these findings suggest that technology-mediated touch may be interpreted through existing relationship-dependent expectations governing bodily boundaries, rather than constituting a fully distinct category of digital interaction.
特定关系的身体接触模式延伸到数字媒介的触摸
社交接触是由亲密关系和受文化影响的界限形成的。然而,新兴的数字系统正在重塑触摸的体验方式,通过机器人、可穿戴设备和非接触式接口,可以远程传递类似触摸的感觉。然而,目前尚不清楚在日常生活中观察到的依赖关系的触摸允许模式是否也延伸到技术介导的触摸。在一项在线身体测绘研究中,来自六个国家的147名参与者对多个社交网络成员和一个人工智能代理的情感联系进行了评级,并指出了他们将允许每个目标通过物理和三种技术媒介方式触摸的身体部位。在各种模式中,情感联系强有力地预测了从身体区域映射得出的可触摸性指数,这表明即使触觉是技术上提供的,亲密关系和触摸允许度之间也存在一致的正相关。这种依赖关系的模式在不同国家都可以观察到,同时在基线容许度和梯度强度方面也存在跨文化差异。允许触摸的地图进一步表明,介导的模式表现出的空间模式与在物理触摸中观察到的空间模式大致相似,更亲密的网络成员可以进入更广泛、更亲密的区域,而遥远的联系很大程度上仅限于远端、社会中立的区域。与人类陌生人相比,人工智能代理被允许有更多的身体接触,但表现出较弱的纽带依赖,并且与实际动机比情感动机更紧密地联系在一起。总之,这些发现表明,技术介导的触摸可以通过现有的关系依赖期望来解释,而不是构成一个完全不同的数字交互类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书