Prognostic Implication of Heart Failure With Reduced and Midrange Ejection Fraction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Mohamed Ellabbad MBBCh, Ahmed Bahnasy MBBCh, Meena Bai MBBS, Sara Aboelmaaty MBBCh, Ahmed E. Ali MBBCh, William R. Miranda MD, Heidi M. Connolly MD, Alexander C. Egbe MD, MPH, MS
{"title":"Prognostic Implication of Heart Failure With Reduced and Midrange Ejection Fraction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease","authors":"Mohamed Ellabbad MBBCh,&nbsp;Ahmed Bahnasy MBBCh,&nbsp;Meena Bai MBBS,&nbsp;Sara Aboelmaaty MBBCh,&nbsp;Ahmed E. Ali MBBCh,&nbsp;William R. Miranda MD,&nbsp;Heidi M. Connolly MD,&nbsp;Alexander C. Egbe MD, MPH, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.cjcpc.2026.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the acquired heart disease population, heart failure (HF) is broadly classified based on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) as HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). The prognostic role of this LVEF-based HF classification has not been evaluated in the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population because of anatomic and physiological heterogeneity within this population. The current study aimed to address this knowledge gap, by assessing the prevalence, predictors (correlates), and prognostic implications of HFrEF in adults with CHD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with CHD and morphologic LV as the systemic ventricle. Patients were classified as HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 41%-49%), and pEF (LVEF ≥50%).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 7981 patients, 7203 (90%) had pEF, 451 (6%) had HFmrEF, and 327 (4%) had HFrEF. The correlates of HFrEF were older age, male sex, pacemaker implantation, multiple prior sternotomies, and acquired comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. The 15-year mortality risk was 18%, 36%, and 67% in the pEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Both HFmrEF (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.64 [95% confidence interval: 1.29; 2.09], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and HFrEF (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.33 [95% confidence interval: 2.72; 4.27], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were associated with mortality on multivariable analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the elevated risk of mortality in patients with LV systolic dysfunction (both mrEF and rEF) and the emerging data suggesting the efficacy of HF therapy in patients with CHD, there is an urgent need to implement HF therapy in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100249,"journal":{"name":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 258-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772812926000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the acquired heart disease population, heart failure (HF) is broadly classified based on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) as HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). The prognostic role of this LVEF-based HF classification has not been evaluated in the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population because of anatomic and physiological heterogeneity within this population. The current study aimed to address this knowledge gap, by assessing the prevalence, predictors (correlates), and prognostic implications of HFrEF in adults with CHD.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with CHD and morphologic LV as the systemic ventricle. Patients were classified as HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 41%-49%), and pEF (LVEF ≥50%).

Results

Of 7981 patients, 7203 (90%) had pEF, 451 (6%) had HFmrEF, and 327 (4%) had HFrEF. The correlates of HFrEF were older age, male sex, pacemaker implantation, multiple prior sternotomies, and acquired comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. The 15-year mortality risk was 18%, 36%, and 67% in the pEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Both HFmrEF (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.64 [95% confidence interval: 1.29; 2.09], P < 0.001) and HFrEF (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.33 [95% confidence interval: 2.72; 4.27], P < 0.001) were associated with mortality on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Given the elevated risk of mortality in patients with LV systolic dysfunction (both mrEF and rEF) and the emerging data suggesting the efficacy of HF therapy in patients with CHD, there is an urgent need to implement HF therapy in this population.
成人先天性心脏病患者伴射血分数降低和中程心力衰竭的预后意义
在获得性心脏病人群中,心衰(HF)根据左心室射血分数(EF)大致分为EF降低型心衰(HFrEF)、EF中等型心衰(HFmrEF)和EF保留型心衰(HFpEF)。由于成人先天性心脏病(CHD)人群的解剖和生理异质性,这种基于lvef的心衰分类在该人群中的预后作用尚未得到评估。目前的研究旨在通过评估成人冠心病患者HFrEF的患病率、预测因素(相关因素)和预后意义来解决这一知识差距。方法回顾性队列研究成人冠心病伴形态左室的系统心室。患者分为HFrEF (LVEF≤40%)、HFmrEF (LVEF 41% ~ 49%)和pEF (LVEF≥50%)。结果7981例患者中,7203例(90%)为pEF, 451例(6%)为HFmrEF, 327例(4%)为HFrEF。与HFrEF相关的因素有:年龄较大、男性、植入起搏器、既往多次胸骨切开术以及获得性合并症,如高血压、冠状动脉疾病、糖尿病和心房颤动。pEF组、HFmrEF组和HFrEF组15年死亡风险分别为18%、36%和67% (P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,HFmrEF(校正风险比:1.64[95%可信区间:1.29;2.09],P < 0.001)和HFrEF(校正风险比:3.33[95%可信区间:2.72;4.27],P < 0.001)与死亡率相关。鉴于左室收缩功能障碍患者(包括mrEF和rEF)的死亡风险升高,以及新的数据表明心衰治疗对冠心病患者的疗效,迫切需要在这一人群中实施心衰治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书