Diagnostic accuracy of bile acid detection via mass spectrometry for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP): A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.4 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cjac.2026.100732
Xue-Chun Wang, Jing-Hua Liu, Xiao-Hong Zhang, Min Liu, Dan-Dan Xu, Wei Liu
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of bile acid detection via mass spectrometry for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP): A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xue-Chun Wang,&nbsp;Jing-Hua Liu,&nbsp;Xiao-Hong Zhang,&nbsp;Min Liu,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Xu,&nbsp;Wei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjac.2026.100732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) has traditionally relied on detecting elevated total bile acids. However, measuring total levels may not capture the full diagnostic picture. Mass spectrometry (MS) now allows precise measurement of individual bile acid subtypes. Yet, the clinical diagnostic value of this detailed profile remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of MS-based bile acid analysis for ICP.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology: Search Strategy and Study Selection</h3><div>We systematically queried five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, OVID, and CNKI. Our search strategy incorporated both keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) related to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, its diagnosis, and mass spectrometry. Two authors then independently screened the retrieved records, extracted the relevant data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the studies that were included.</div></div><div><h3>Statistical Synthesis</h3><div>The primary goal of our analysis was to determine how well mass spectrometry–based bile acid profiling identifies ICP. We therefore pooled the reported sensitivity and specificity from the selected studies. To present the overall diagnostic accuracy, we constructed a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. All statistical work was completed using Stata 17.0, Review Manager 5.4, and Meta-Disc.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated eight studies that focused on two clinical applications of mass spectrometry (MS) in bile acid profiling. For distinguishing ICP from healthy pregnancies (four studies), the assay showed excellent accuracy, with sensitivity at 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.98), and specificity at 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.98). The diagnostic odds ratio was 332.18 (95% CI: 100.89–1093.71), and the area under the SROC curve reached 0.9860.</div><div>In the comparison between ICP and asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy (four studies), the method continued to perform well, showing a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–0.97). The diagnostic odds ratio was 156.54 (95% CI: 47.07–520.55), and the SROC area was 0.9735.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings demonstrate that mass spectrometry-based bile acid profiling provides reliable diagnostic performance for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, clearly distinguishing it from healthy pregnancies and from asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy (AHP). Moving forward, key priorities will involve confirming these results in larger, multi-center studies, creating unified international guidelines for clinical application, and resolving the recognized shortcomings of current diagnostic approaches for ICP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":277,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"54 8","pages":"Article 100732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187220402600040X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) has traditionally relied on detecting elevated total bile acids. However, measuring total levels may not capture the full diagnostic picture. Mass spectrometry (MS) now allows precise measurement of individual bile acid subtypes. Yet, the clinical diagnostic value of this detailed profile remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of MS-based bile acid analysis for ICP.

Methodology: Search Strategy and Study Selection

We systematically queried five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, OVID, and CNKI. Our search strategy incorporated both keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) related to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, its diagnosis, and mass spectrometry. Two authors then independently screened the retrieved records, extracted the relevant data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the studies that were included.

Statistical Synthesis

The primary goal of our analysis was to determine how well mass spectrometry–based bile acid profiling identifies ICP. We therefore pooled the reported sensitivity and specificity from the selected studies. To present the overall diagnostic accuracy, we constructed a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. All statistical work was completed using Stata 17.0, Review Manager 5.4, and Meta-Disc.

Results

The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated eight studies that focused on two clinical applications of mass spectrometry (MS) in bile acid profiling. For distinguishing ICP from healthy pregnancies (four studies), the assay showed excellent accuracy, with sensitivity at 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.98), and specificity at 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.98). The diagnostic odds ratio was 332.18 (95% CI: 100.89–1093.71), and the area under the SROC curve reached 0.9860.
In the comparison between ICP and asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy (four studies), the method continued to perform well, showing a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–0.97). The diagnostic odds ratio was 156.54 (95% CI: 47.07–520.55), and the SROC area was 0.9735.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that mass spectrometry-based bile acid profiling provides reliable diagnostic performance for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, clearly distinguishing it from healthy pregnancies and from asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy (AHP). Moving forward, key priorities will involve confirming these results in larger, multi-center studies, creating unified international guidelines for clinical application, and resolving the recognized shortcomings of current diagnostic approaches for ICP.
质谱法检测胆汁酸对妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症(ICP)的诊断准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症(ICP)的诊断传统上依赖于检测总胆汁酸升高。然而,测量总水平可能无法捕捉到诊断的全貌。质谱法(MS)现在可以精确测量单个胆汁酸亚型。然而,临床诊断价值的详细资料仍不清楚。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了MS-based胆汁酸分析对ICP的诊断准确性。方法:检索策略和研究选择我们系统地查询了5个数据库:PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID和CNKI。我们的搜索策略包括与妊娠肝内胆汁淤积、诊断和质谱相关的关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)。然后两位作者独立筛选检索到的记录,提取相关数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。统计综合我们分析的主要目的是确定基于质谱的胆汁酸谱分析识别ICP的效果。因此,我们汇总了所选研究报告的敏感性和特异性。为了呈现整体诊断的准确性,我们构建了一个总的接受者工作特征(SROC)曲线。所有统计工作均使用Stata 17.0、Review Manager 5.4和Meta-Disc完成。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了8项研究,重点关注了质谱(MS)在胆汁酸谱分析中的两项临床应用。对于区分ICP与健康妊娠(四项研究),该方法显示出极好的准确性,灵敏度为0.95(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.89-0.98),特异性为0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98)。诊断优势比为332.18 (95% CI: 100.89 ~ 1093.71), SROC曲线下面积为0.9860。在ICP与妊娠无症状高胆管血症(4项研究)的比较中,该方法继续表现良好,敏感性为0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97),特异性为0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97)。诊断优势比为156.54 (95% CI: 47.07-520.55), SROC面积为0.9735。结论基于质谱法的胆汁酸谱分析对妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症具有可靠的诊断价值,可明确区分妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症与健康妊娠和妊娠无症状高胆汁症(AHP)。展望未来,关键的优先事项将包括在更大的、多中心的研究中确认这些结果,为临床应用创建统一的国际指南,并解决当前ICP诊断方法公认的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17223
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(CJAC) is an academic journal of analytical chemistry established in 1972 and sponsored by the Chinese Chemical Society and Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its objectives are to report the original scientific research achievements and review the recent development of analytical chemistry in all areas. The journal sets up 5 columns including Research Papers, Research Notes, Experimental Technique and Instrument, Review and Progress and Summary Accounts. The journal published monthly in Chinese language. A detailed abstract, keywords and the titles of figures and tables are provided in English, except column of Summary Accounts. Prof. Wang Erkang, an outstanding analytical chemist, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Third World Academy of Sciences, holds the post of the Editor-in-chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书