Aligning Dietary Intake and Food Purchase Data in United States Older Adults: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Circana Consumer Network

IF 4.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Current Developments in Nutrition Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.109421
Naglaa H El-Abbadi, Joshua Rutt, Marcus Lehr, Frederick Nusetor, Cristina Moraga Franco, Andrea C Carlson, M. Kyla Shea, Chao-Qiang Lai, Laurence D Parnell, Eric Miller, Jose M Ordovas
{"title":"Aligning Dietary Intake and Food Purchase Data in United States Older Adults: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Circana Consumer Network","authors":"Naglaa H El-Abbadi,&nbsp;Joshua Rutt,&nbsp;Marcus Lehr,&nbsp;Frederick Nusetor,&nbsp;Cristina Moraga Franco,&nbsp;Andrea C Carlson,&nbsp;M. Kyla Shea,&nbsp;Chao-Qiang Lai,&nbsp;Laurence D Parnell,&nbsp;Eric Miller,&nbsp;Jose M Ordovas","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.109421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diet quality is a key determinant of healthy aging, yet fully assessing dietary intake remains a challenge partly because of data limitations and difficulty in integrating information from methodologically distinct datasets. Different nationally representative datasets can offer complementary perspectives: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) captures self-reported dietary intake using 1 to 2 d of 24-h recall, whereas the Circana Consumer Network (CN) is a national retail dataset that records year-long grocery purchases from ∼60,000 United States households.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate whether dietary intake reported in NHANES 2017–2018 aligns with food purchase trends in CN 2018 among United States adults aged ≥55 y.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined self-reported dietary intake of grocery/store-bought foods from 24-h recalls in NHANES (<em>n</em> = 1950 individuals) and, separately, household grocery purchases from 1- and 2-person households in CN (<em>n</em> = 29,192 households), analyzed by sex and age group (55–64 y, 65–74 y, and 75+ y). For each dataset, healthfulness of food intakes or purchases was assessed using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and food group proportions were evaluated by percent mass (grams) and energy (kilocalorie).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean total HEI scores were modest and comparable across datasets (NHANES: 55.7 ± 0.9; CN: 51.3 ± 0.1; <em>P</em> = 0.004). Both sources demonstrated moderate agreement among the 13 HEI component scores, revealing consistent shortfalls in total/whole fruit, greens and beans, whole grains, and saturated fat moderation. Food group proportions had &lt;10% difference across most categories by both mass and energy, although there were higher discrepancies for mixed dishes, condiments, and snacks/sweets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In United States adults aged ≥55 y, grocery/store-sourced intake from NHANES and household grocery purchases from CN showed broadly similar but not interchangeable patterns of diet quality, indicating that purchase data can complement, but not replace, recall-based dietary surveillance. Integrating purchase records with recalls could provide deeper insights into older adults’ dietary behaviors and strengthen precision nutrition research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"10 8","pages":"Article 109421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299126017865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diet quality is a key determinant of healthy aging, yet fully assessing dietary intake remains a challenge partly because of data limitations and difficulty in integrating information from methodologically distinct datasets. Different nationally representative datasets can offer complementary perspectives: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) captures self-reported dietary intake using 1 to 2 d of 24-h recall, whereas the Circana Consumer Network (CN) is a national retail dataset that records year-long grocery purchases from ∼60,000 United States households.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate whether dietary intake reported in NHANES 2017–2018 aligns with food purchase trends in CN 2018 among United States adults aged ≥55 y.

Methods

We examined self-reported dietary intake of grocery/store-bought foods from 24-h recalls in NHANES (n = 1950 individuals) and, separately, household grocery purchases from 1- and 2-person households in CN (n = 29,192 households), analyzed by sex and age group (55–64 y, 65–74 y, and 75+ y). For each dataset, healthfulness of food intakes or purchases was assessed using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and food group proportions were evaluated by percent mass (grams) and energy (kilocalorie).

Results

Mean total HEI scores were modest and comparable across datasets (NHANES: 55.7 ± 0.9; CN: 51.3 ± 0.1; P = 0.004). Both sources demonstrated moderate agreement among the 13 HEI component scores, revealing consistent shortfalls in total/whole fruit, greens and beans, whole grains, and saturated fat moderation. Food group proportions had <10% difference across most categories by both mass and energy, although there were higher discrepancies for mixed dishes, condiments, and snacks/sweets.

Conclusions

In United States adults aged ≥55 y, grocery/store-sourced intake from NHANES and household grocery purchases from CN showed broadly similar but not interchangeable patterns of diet quality, indicating that purchase data can complement, but not replace, recall-based dietary surveillance. Integrating purchase records with recalls could provide deeper insights into older adults’ dietary behaviors and strengthen precision nutrition research.
调整美国老年人的膳食摄入量和食品购买数据:来自全国健康和营养检查调查和加拿大消费者网络的见解
饮食质量是健康老龄化的关键决定因素,但全面评估膳食摄入量仍然是一个挑战,部分原因是数据限制和难以整合来自不同方法数据集的信息。不同的具有全国代表性的数据集可以提供互补的观点:国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)使用24小时回忆的1至2天捕获自我报告的饮食摄入量,而Circana消费者网络(CN)是一个全国零售数据集,记录了大约60,000个美国家庭一年的杂货购买情况。本研究旨在评估NHANES 2017-2018年报告的膳食摄入量是否与美国年龄≥55岁的成年人2018年的食品购买趋势相符。方法我们检查了NHANES 24小时召回中杂货店/商店购买食品的自我报告膳食摄入量(n = 1950人),并分别检查了中国1人和2人家庭(n = 29,192户)的家庭食品购买情况,并按性别和年龄组(55 - 64岁、65-74岁和75+岁)进行分析。对于每个数据集,使用2015年健康饮食指数(HEI)评估食物摄入或购买的健康程度,并通过百分比质量(克)和能量(千卡)评估食物组比例。结果各数据集的平均HEI总分一般且具有可比性(NHANES: 55.7±0.9;CN: 51.3±0.1;P = 0.004)。这两个来源在13个HEI成分得分中显示出适度的一致性,揭示了总/全水果、蔬菜和豆类、全谷物和饱和脂肪适度的一致不足。在大多数类别中,食物组的比例在质量和能量方面都有10%的差异,尽管混合菜肴、调味品和零食/糖果的差异更大。结论在美国年龄≥55岁的成年人中,来自NHANES的食品杂货/商店的摄入量和来自CN的家庭食品杂货购买显示出大致相似但不可互换的饮食质量模式,表明购买数据可以补充,但不能取代基于召回的饮食监测。将购买记录与召回相结合,可以更深入地了解老年人的饮食行为,加强精准营养研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书