Volatility spillover of cross-border fund flow and the geopolitical risk channels

Journal of Digital Economy Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jdec.2025.12.002
Junlong Xu, Conghua Wen, Lu Zong
{"title":"Volatility spillover of cross-border fund flow and the geopolitical risk channels","authors":"Junlong Xu,&nbsp;Conghua Wen,&nbsp;Lu Zong","doi":"10.1016/j.jdec.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates cross-border risk spillover led by fund flow volatility. With a focus on global and country-specific geopolitical risk (GPR), we explore vulnerability channels where volatility is transmitted and propagated based on the equity fund flow data of G20 countries. Following a data-driven methodology, we quantify long-term systemic risk spillovers for each country using the PageRank algorithm applied to a volatility network, capturing the intensity of directional, pairwise risk spillovers. Traditional measures of systemic risk often focus on direct pairwise relationships, leaving indirect and multi-step spillovers unquantified. To address this, we adopt a computational network approach, constructing a directed volatility spillover network from G20 fund flow data. PageRank, adapted from graph-based machine learning, captures both direct and indirect risk exposures by modeling risk transmission within the network as a Markov process, providing a data-driven measure of long-term systemic vulnerability for each country. We then analyze these network-derived risk measures using panel regressions with global and country-specific GPR indices, along with recognized push and pull factors, to explore how countries respond differently to geopolitical uncertainties. Our findings reveal cyclic patterns in fund flow dependence, with smaller emerging markets, such as Indonesia, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa, showing heightened vulnerability during turmoil. Country-specific GPR emerges as a potent pull factor, especially for oil-exporting economies, while geographic location serves as a primary channel of spillover. In periods of global tension, Latin American emerging markets and the Asia-Pacific region display a “safe-haven” role, contrasting with higher exposure in North America, the Middle East, and Africa. This study demonstrates the potential of computational network methods to advance systemic risk modeling in finance, offering a scalable, data-driven framework for understanding how geopolitical risk interacts with cross-border capital flows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Economy","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 286-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067025000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates cross-border risk spillover led by fund flow volatility. With a focus on global and country-specific geopolitical risk (GPR), we explore vulnerability channels where volatility is transmitted and propagated based on the equity fund flow data of G20 countries. Following a data-driven methodology, we quantify long-term systemic risk spillovers for each country using the PageRank algorithm applied to a volatility network, capturing the intensity of directional, pairwise risk spillovers. Traditional measures of systemic risk often focus on direct pairwise relationships, leaving indirect and multi-step spillovers unquantified. To address this, we adopt a computational network approach, constructing a directed volatility spillover network from G20 fund flow data. PageRank, adapted from graph-based machine learning, captures both direct and indirect risk exposures by modeling risk transmission within the network as a Markov process, providing a data-driven measure of long-term systemic vulnerability for each country. We then analyze these network-derived risk measures using panel regressions with global and country-specific GPR indices, along with recognized push and pull factors, to explore how countries respond differently to geopolitical uncertainties. Our findings reveal cyclic patterns in fund flow dependence, with smaller emerging markets, such as Indonesia, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa, showing heightened vulnerability during turmoil. Country-specific GPR emerges as a potent pull factor, especially for oil-exporting economies, while geographic location serves as a primary channel of spillover. In periods of global tension, Latin American emerging markets and the Asia-Pacific region display a “safe-haven” role, contrasting with higher exposure in North America, the Middle East, and Africa. This study demonstrates the potential of computational network methods to advance systemic risk modeling in finance, offering a scalable, data-driven framework for understanding how geopolitical risk interacts with cross-border capital flows.
跨境资金流动的波动外溢与地缘政治风险渠道
本研究探讨资金流动波动导致的跨境风险外溢。我们以全球和特定国家地缘政治风险(GPR)为重点,基于G20国家股票资金流动数据,探索波动性传递和传播的脆弱性渠道。采用数据驱动的方法,我们使用应用于波动率网络的PageRank算法量化了每个国家的长期系统性风险溢出,捕捉了定向、两两风险溢出的强度。传统的系统性风险衡量方法往往侧重于直接的两两关系,导致间接和多步骤溢出效应无法量化。为了解决这一问题,我们采用计算网络方法,从G20资金流数据构建了一个定向波动溢出网络。PageRank采用基于图的机器学习,通过将网络内的风险传递建模为马尔可夫过程,捕捉直接和间接的风险暴露,为每个国家提供长期系统脆弱性的数据驱动衡量标准。然后,我们使用具有全球和特定国家GPR指数的面板回归分析这些网络衍生的风险度量,以及公认的推动和拉动因素,以探索各国如何对地缘政治不确定性做出不同的反应。我们的研究结果揭示了资金流动依赖的周期性模式,较小的新兴市场,如印度尼西亚、阿根廷、沙特阿拉伯和南非,在动荡期间表现出更高的脆弱性。具体国家的GPR成为一个强有力的拉动因素,特别是对石油出口经济体而言,而地理位置则是溢出效应的主要渠道。在全球紧张时期,拉美新兴市场和亚太地区表现出“避险”的作用,而北美、中东和非洲的风险敞口较高。本研究展示了计算网络方法在推进金融系统风险建模方面的潜力,为理解地缘政治风险如何与跨境资本流动相互作用提供了一个可扩展的、数据驱动的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书