{"title":"A (Political) Battle of the Sexes: Gender Polarization on Gender‐Related Attitudes Across 14 Societies","authors":"Jaime L. Napier, Kodai Kusano","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is well‐established that women typically endorse more progressive gender‐related attitudes compared to men, key questions remain about the magnitude of this gender difference and whether it systematically varies in relation to levels of gender inequality across societies. In the current research, we aim to address these questions by examining endorsement of traditional (overt) and modern (indirect) forms of sexism across 14 countries, including those with relatively low levels of gender equality (e.g., Saudi Arabia, India, and Egypt) and those with relatively high equality (e.g., Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Results show that endorsement of old‐fashioned sexism is inversely related to country‐level gender equality for women and men, whereas modern sexism endorsement is inversely related to gender equality for women, but not men. Thus, gender polarization is largest on modern sexist attitudes in relatively high gender‐equal countries, and this is because in such contexts modern forms of sexism are especially likely to be rejected by women.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although it is well‐established that women typically endorse more progressive gender‐related attitudes compared to men, key questions remain about the magnitude of this gender difference and whether it systematically varies in relation to levels of gender inequality across societies. In the current research, we aim to address these questions by examining endorsement of traditional (overt) and modern (indirect) forms of sexism across 14 countries, including those with relatively low levels of gender equality (e.g., Saudi Arabia, India, and Egypt) and those with relatively high equality (e.g., Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Results show that endorsement of old‐fashioned sexism is inversely related to country‐level gender equality for women and men, whereas modern sexism endorsement is inversely related to gender equality for women, but not men. Thus, gender polarization is largest on modern sexist attitudes in relatively high gender‐equal countries, and this is because in such contexts modern forms of sexism are especially likely to be rejected by women.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.