Quit intention by tobacco use type among adults using cigarettes and heated tobacco products: findings from the 2024 Korea Community Health Survey.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jaehyung Kong, Heewon Kang, Eunsil Cheon, Sung-Il Cho
{"title":"Quit intention by tobacco use type among adults using cigarettes and heated tobacco products: findings from the 2024 Korea Community Health Survey.","authors":"Jaehyung Kong, Heewon Kang, Eunsil Cheon, Sung-Il Cho","doi":"10.4178/epih.e2026041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since heated tobacco products (HTPs) entered the tobacco market, their market share and use have increased, but their implications for tobacco use patterns and cessation remain unclear. This study classified conventional cigarette (CC) and HTP use into detailed subgroups and examined whether tobacco consumption and intention to quit differed across tobacco use types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 40,434 adults who currently used CCs or HTPs in the 2024 Korea Community Health Survey. Tobacco use was classified into 5 groups according to lifetime and current CC and HTP use. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess group distributions, and multinomial and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify associated factors and examine intention to quit within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among adults currently using CCs or HTPs, 73.7% reported exclusive CC use, 10.2% reported exclusive HTP use, and 16.1% reported dual use. Overall mean tobacco consumption was 14.4 sticks per day and was highest among dual users (20.7 sticks per day). Compared with the current CC and never HTP group, the current CC and former HTP group had higher odds of intending to quit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34), whereas the current HTP and former CC group had lower odds of intending to quit (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intention to quit varied by tobacco use type. Cessation services should account for differences in tobacco use patterns and intention to quit across tobacco use groups, particularly among people with prior or current HTP use and those who use both CCs and HTPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48543,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2026041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2026041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Since heated tobacco products (HTPs) entered the tobacco market, their market share and use have increased, but their implications for tobacco use patterns and cessation remain unclear. This study classified conventional cigarette (CC) and HTP use into detailed subgroups and examined whether tobacco consumption and intention to quit differed across tobacco use types.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 40,434 adults who currently used CCs or HTPs in the 2024 Korea Community Health Survey. Tobacco use was classified into 5 groups according to lifetime and current CC and HTP use. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess group distributions, and multinomial and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify associated factors and examine intention to quit within 6 months.

Results: Among adults currently using CCs or HTPs, 73.7% reported exclusive CC use, 10.2% reported exclusive HTP use, and 16.1% reported dual use. Overall mean tobacco consumption was 14.4 sticks per day and was highest among dual users (20.7 sticks per day). Compared with the current CC and never HTP group, the current CC and former HTP group had higher odds of intending to quit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34), whereas the current HTP and former CC group had lower odds of intending to quit (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90).

Conclusion: Intention to quit varied by tobacco use type. Cessation services should account for differences in tobacco use patterns and intention to quit across tobacco use groups, particularly among people with prior or current HTP use and those who use both CCs and HTPs.

使用香烟和加热烟草制品的成年人的烟草使用类型戒烟意向:来自2024年韩国社区健康调查的结果
目标:自加热烟草制品进入烟草市场以来,其市场份额和使用量有所增加,但其对烟草使用模式和戒烟的影响仍不清楚。本研究将传统卷烟(CC)和HTP的使用分类为详细的亚组,并检查烟草消费和戒烟意图是否因烟草使用类型而异。方法:分析2024年韩国社区健康调查中40,434名目前使用CCs或HTPs的成年人的数据。烟草使用根据终生和目前的CC和HTP使用情况分为5组。描述性分析评估分组分布,并拟合多项和多变量logistic回归模型以确定相关因素并检查6个月内戒烟的意向。结果:在目前使用CC或HTP的成年人中,73.7%报告单独使用CC, 10.2%报告单独使用HTP, 16.1%报告双重使用。总体平均烟草消费量为每天14.4支,在双重使用者中最高(每天20.7支)。与当前CC组和从未HTP组相比,当前CC组和前HTP组打算戒烟的几率更高(调整比值比[aOR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34),而当前HTP组和前CC组打算戒烟的几率较低(aOR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90)。结论:吸烟类型不同,戒烟意向不同。戒烟服务应考虑到不同烟草使用群体的烟草使用模式和戒烟意愿的差异,特别是在曾经或目前使用高剂量烟草制品的人群以及同时使用低剂量烟草制品和高剂量烟草制品的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Health
Epidemiology and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Health (epiH) is an electronic journal publishing papers in all areas of epidemiology and public health. It is indexed on PubMed Central and the scope is wide-ranging: including descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology; primary preventive measures; screening approaches and secondary prevention; clinical epidemiology; and all aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases prevention. The epiH publishes original research, and also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, cohort profiles and data profiles, epidemic and case investigations, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书