Employment quality and workers' health and well-being in China: longitudinal evidence from the China Family Panel Studies.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wenshuai Qin, Hao Huang, Rui Li, Ziyodulla Nurov
{"title":"Employment quality and workers' health and well-being in China: longitudinal evidence from the China Family Panel Studies.","authors":"Wenshuai Qin, Hao Huang, Rui Li, Ziyodulla Nurov","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiag046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the relationship between employment quality and workers' health and well-being in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the 2018, 2020, and 2022 waves of the China Family Panel Studies. We constructed an individual-level panel sample and measured employment quality using 4 dimensions: reward, job satisfaction, working-time quality, and social security. Individual fixed-effects models were used as the main estimation approach. Robustness checks were conducted using a balanced panel sample and an alternative employment quality index excluding the job satisfaction dimension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher employment quality was positively associated with better self-rated health, mental health, happiness, and confidence in the future. Among the 4 dimensions, job satisfaction showed the most consistent positive associations with all 4 outcomes, whereas reward and working-time quality were mainly associated with mental health. Social security did not show statistically significant associations in the fixed-effects models. In the robustness check excluding job satisfaction, the coefficients of the alternative employment quality index remained positive but became smaller and less statistically significant; only the association with mental health remained statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Workers' health and well-being were related not only to employment status or income, but also to broader aspects of employment quality, including subjective work experience, working-time arrangements, and institutional protection. Employment quality and its different dimensions should receive greater attention in occupational health promotion and the evaluation of high-quality employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13540727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiag046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the relationship between employment quality and workers' health and well-being in China.

Methods: Data were drawn from the 2018, 2020, and 2022 waves of the China Family Panel Studies. We constructed an individual-level panel sample and measured employment quality using 4 dimensions: reward, job satisfaction, working-time quality, and social security. Individual fixed-effects models were used as the main estimation approach. Robustness checks were conducted using a balanced panel sample and an alternative employment quality index excluding the job satisfaction dimension.

Results: Higher employment quality was positively associated with better self-rated health, mental health, happiness, and confidence in the future. Among the 4 dimensions, job satisfaction showed the most consistent positive associations with all 4 outcomes, whereas reward and working-time quality were mainly associated with mental health. Social security did not show statistically significant associations in the fixed-effects models. In the robustness check excluding job satisfaction, the coefficients of the alternative employment quality index remained positive but became smaller and less statistically significant; only the association with mental health remained statistically significant.

Conclusions: Workers' health and well-being were related not only to employment status or income, but also to broader aspects of employment quality, including subjective work experience, working-time arrangements, and institutional protection. Employment quality and its different dimensions should receive greater attention in occupational health promotion and the evaluation of high-quality employment.

中国就业质量与工人健康和福祉:来自中国家庭面板研究的纵向证据。
目的:研究中国就业质量与劳动者健康和幸福感之间的关系。方法:数据来自2018年、2020年和2022年的中国家庭面板研究。我们构建了一个个人水平的面板样本,并使用四个维度衡量就业质量:奖励、工作满意度、工作时间质量和社会保障。采用个体固定效应模型作为主要的估计方法。稳健性检查进行了使用平衡面板样本和替代就业质量指数排除工作满意度维度。结果:较高的就业质量与较好的自我评价健康、心理健康、幸福感和对未来的信心呈正相关。在四个维度中,工作满意度与所有四个结果显示出最一致的正相关,而奖励和工作时间质量主要与心理健康相关。在固定效应模型中,社会保障没有显示出统计学上显著的关联。在排除工作满意度的稳健性检验中,替代性就业质量指数的系数仍然为正,但变得更小,统计意义更不显著;只有与心理健康的关联在统计上仍然显著。结论:工人的健康和幸福不仅与就业状况或收入有关,还与就业质量的更广泛方面有关,包括主观工作经验、工作时间安排和制度保护。在职业健康促进和高质量就业评价中,应更加重视就业质量及其不同维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书