An acceptance-based healthy lifestyle programme for community-dwelling patients with pneumoconiosis: A waitlist pilot randomised controlled trial.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-14 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2026.2717021
Hon Lon Tam, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Hau Yi Ngan, Leona Yuen Ling Leung, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo
{"title":"An acceptance-based healthy lifestyle programme for community-dwelling patients with pneumoconiosis: A waitlist pilot randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Hon Lon Tam, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Hau Yi Ngan, Leona Yuen Ling Leung, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2026.2717021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory symptoms such as cough and shortness of breath are prevalent among patients with pneumoconiosis. These symptoms reduce their engagement in daily activities and induce psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Did a 6-week acceptance-based healthy lifestyle programme reduce psychological inflexibility (primary outcome) and enhance the health outcomes among community-dwelling patients with pneumoconiosis?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A two-arm, prospective, multicenter, waitlist pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Patients with pneumoconiosis were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or waitlist group at a 1:1 ratio, with intervention group receiving the programme first. The intervention consisted of four biweekly interactive sessions on integrating acceptance-based components into pneumoconiosis management. Psychological inflexibility and health outcomes were assessed at baseline, Week 6, and Week 14 by trained research assistants. A generalized estimating equations model was used to examine the effects of the intervention effect between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the two groups. Compared to the waitlist group, the participants in the intervention group showed significant reduction in psychological inflexibility (β = -5.83, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and improvement in exercise self-efficacy (β = 11.68, <i>p</i> = 0.007) at Week 6, and reduction in body weight (β = -1.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001) at Week 14. No significant differences were observed for other outcomes. Moderate effect size was noted on the outcomes of psychological inflexibility and exercise self-efficacy at Week 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of acceptance-based components into pneumoconiosis management may reduce psychological inflexibility and promote engagement in exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"32 1","pages":"2717021"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2026.2717021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory symptoms such as cough and shortness of breath are prevalent among patients with pneumoconiosis. These symptoms reduce their engagement in daily activities and induce psychological distress.

Research question: Did a 6-week acceptance-based healthy lifestyle programme reduce psychological inflexibility (primary outcome) and enhance the health outcomes among community-dwelling patients with pneumoconiosis?

Study design and methods: A two-arm, prospective, multicenter, waitlist pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Patients with pneumoconiosis were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or waitlist group at a 1:1 ratio, with intervention group receiving the programme first. The intervention consisted of four biweekly interactive sessions on integrating acceptance-based components into pneumoconiosis management. Psychological inflexibility and health outcomes were assessed at baseline, Week 6, and Week 14 by trained research assistants. A generalized estimating equations model was used to examine the effects of the intervention effect between groups.

Results: Eighty patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the two groups. Compared to the waitlist group, the participants in the intervention group showed significant reduction in psychological inflexibility (β = -5.83, p = 0.002) and improvement in exercise self-efficacy (β = 11.68, p = 0.007) at Week 6, and reduction in body weight (β = -1.09, p < 0.001) at Week 14. No significant differences were observed for other outcomes. Moderate effect size was noted on the outcomes of psychological inflexibility and exercise self-efficacy at Week 6.

Conclusion: The integration of acceptance-based components into pneumoconiosis management may reduce psychological inflexibility and promote engagement in exercise.

基于接受的健康生活方式计划为社区居住尘肺患者:一项等候名单试点随机对照试验。
背景:呼吸系统症状如咳嗽和呼吸短促在尘肺患者中普遍存在。这些症状减少了他们日常活动的参与,并引起心理困扰。研究问题:在社区居住的尘肺患者中,为期6周的以接受为基础的健康生活方式计划是否能减少心理不灵活性(主要结局)并提高健康结局?研究设计和方法:进行了一项双臂、前瞻性、多中心、等待名单先导随机对照试验。尘肺患者按1:1的比例随机分为干预组和候补组,干预组先接受治疗方案。干预包括四个每两周一次的互动式会议,将基于接受度的组成部分整合到尘肺病管理中。心理不灵活性和健康结果由训练有素的研究助理在基线、第6周和第14周进行评估。采用广义估计方程模型检验组间干预效果的影响。结果:80例患者随机分为两组。与候补组相比,干预组参与者在第6周的心理不灵活性显著降低(β = -5.83, p = 0.002),运动自我效能显著改善(β = 11.68, p = 0.007),体重显著降低(β = -1.09, p)。结论:将接纳性成分整合到尘肺管理中可以降低心理不灵活性,促进运动参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书