Orthodontic Materials and 3D Printing: A Systematic Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 Q1 Dentistry
Martin Baxmann, Márton Zsoldos, Krisztina Kárpáti
{"title":"Orthodontic Materials and 3D Printing: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Martin Baxmann, Márton Zsoldos, Krisztina Kárpáti","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1824747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This systematic scoping review evaluates the current evidence regarding conventional acrylic- and thermoplastic-based materials, directly printed resins, and emerging materials used in orthodontic appliance fabrication. Particular emphasis was placed on material properties, biocompatibility, manufacturing considerations, aging behavior, clinical applications, and the integration of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies into contemporary orthodontic workflows.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception through May 2026. Experimental studies, review articles, case reports, and relevant technical documents addressing orthodontic appliance fabrication, material performance, biocompatibility, or digital manufacturing technologies were considered for inclusion. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 45 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The available evidence indicates that 3D printing technologies enable high levels of customization, digital workflow integration, and improved dimensional accuracy. However, material performance varied considerably among printable resins and conventional materials. Thermoplastic materials frequently demonstrated superior stiffness, transparency, color stability, and surface characteristics, whereas directly printed materials offered advantages in manufacturing flexibility and appliance customization. Current evidence generally supports the biocompatibility of contemporary printable resins, although residual monomer release, postprocessing protocols, and polymerization efficiency remain important considerations. Aging studies demonstrated material-dependent changes in mechanical behavior and optical properties, but long-term clinical evidence remains limited.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Digital manufacturing technologies are becoming increasingly integrated into orthodontic practice and have expanded applications in aligners, retainers, and customized orthodontic appliances. However, the evidence base remains dominated by laboratory investigations, with comparatively limited long-term clinical data. Further standardized experimental studies and prospective clinical investigations are needed to evaluate durability, biocompatibility, clinical effectiveness, and the potential role of emerging materials in orthodontic appliance manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1824747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This systematic scoping review evaluates the current evidence regarding conventional acrylic- and thermoplastic-based materials, directly printed resins, and emerging materials used in orthodontic appliance fabrication. Particular emphasis was placed on material properties, biocompatibility, manufacturing considerations, aging behavior, clinical applications, and the integration of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies into contemporary orthodontic workflows.

Abstract: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception through May 2026. Experimental studies, review articles, case reports, and relevant technical documents addressing orthodontic appliance fabrication, material performance, biocompatibility, or digital manufacturing technologies were considered for inclusion. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 45 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis.

Abstract: The available evidence indicates that 3D printing technologies enable high levels of customization, digital workflow integration, and improved dimensional accuracy. However, material performance varied considerably among printable resins and conventional materials. Thermoplastic materials frequently demonstrated superior stiffness, transparency, color stability, and surface characteristics, whereas directly printed materials offered advantages in manufacturing flexibility and appliance customization. Current evidence generally supports the biocompatibility of contemporary printable resins, although residual monomer release, postprocessing protocols, and polymerization efficiency remain important considerations. Aging studies demonstrated material-dependent changes in mechanical behavior and optical properties, but long-term clinical evidence remains limited.

Abstract: Digital manufacturing technologies are becoming increasingly integrated into orthodontic practice and have expanded applications in aligners, retainers, and customized orthodontic appliances. However, the evidence base remains dominated by laboratory investigations, with comparatively limited long-term clinical data. Further standardized experimental studies and prospective clinical investigations are needed to evaluate durability, biocompatibility, clinical effectiveness, and the potential role of emerging materials in orthodontic appliance manufacturing.

正畸材料和3D打印:一个系统的范围审查。
摘要:本系统综述评估了目前关于常规丙烯酸和热塑性材料、直接打印树脂和用于正畸矫治器制造的新兴材料的证据。特别强调的是材料特性,生物相容性,制造考虑因素,老化行为,临床应用,以及三维(3D)打印技术与当代正畸工作流程的集成。摘要:对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar数据库从建库到2026年5月进行了全面的文献检索。实验研究、综述文章、病例报告和有关正畸矫治器制造、材料性能、生物相容性或数字制造技术的相关技术文件被考虑纳入。经过筛选和合格性评估,45项研究被纳入定性综合。摘要:现有证据表明,3D打印技术可以实现高水平的定制化、数字工作流集成和提高尺寸精度。然而,材料性能在可打印树脂和传统材料之间差异很大。热塑性材料通常表现出优越的刚度、透明度、颜色稳定性和表面特性,而直接印刷材料在制造灵活性和设备定制方面具有优势。目前的证据普遍支持当代可打印树脂的生物相容性,尽管残留单体释放、后处理方案和聚合效率仍然是重要的考虑因素。老化研究表明,机械行为和光学特性的变化依赖于材料,但长期的临床证据仍然有限。摘要:数字制造技术越来越多地融入到正畸实践中,并在矫正器、固位器和定制正畸器具中得到了广泛的应用。然而,证据基础仍然以实验室调查为主,长期临床数据相对有限。需要进一步的标准化实验研究和前瞻性临床研究来评估耐久性、生物相容性、临床有效性以及新兴材料在正畸矫治器制造中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书