ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT AS A CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATIVE MODEL.

Q4 Medicine
Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2026-06-01
L Stepanyan, E Asrian, G Lalayan, N Harutyunyan
{"title":"ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT AS A CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATIVE MODEL.","authors":"L Stepanyan, E Asrian, G Lalayan, N Harutyunyan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Academic engagement has emerged as a central construct in higher education research, increasingly positioned as an integrative indicator of educational quality and long-term student outcomes. Despite exponential growth in engagement-related publications, the field remains theoretically fragmented, with models focusing on isolated components rather than the functional interrelations among motivational, regulatory, psychophysiological, and contextual factors. This article presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis and proposes a functional integrative model of academic engagement. Through systematic review of theoretical traditions-including involvement theory, motivational frameworks, self-determination theory, social-cognitive approaches, and psychosocial perspectives-we synthesize current knowledge and identify critical gaps. The proposed model conceptualizes engagement as a dynamic processual mechanism linking predisposing resources (psychological, psychophysiological, and educational), mediating processes (motivational, self-regulatory, and affective-regulatory systems), moderating contextual conditions (institutional, instructional, and social factors), and developmental outcomes (academic, psychological, and professional). The model specifies functional relationships among components, distinguishes between initiating and sustaining mechanisms, and positions well-being as both outcome and resource. This framework provides theoretical grounding for future empirical research and offers strategic guidance for educational practice aimed at fostering sustainable engagement, student well-being, and long-term professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 375","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic engagement has emerged as a central construct in higher education research, increasingly positioned as an integrative indicator of educational quality and long-term student outcomes. Despite exponential growth in engagement-related publications, the field remains theoretically fragmented, with models focusing on isolated components rather than the functional interrelations among motivational, regulatory, psychophysiological, and contextual factors. This article presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis and proposes a functional integrative model of academic engagement. Through systematic review of theoretical traditions-including involvement theory, motivational frameworks, self-determination theory, social-cognitive approaches, and psychosocial perspectives-we synthesize current knowledge and identify critical gaps. The proposed model conceptualizes engagement as a dynamic processual mechanism linking predisposing resources (psychological, psychophysiological, and educational), mediating processes (motivational, self-regulatory, and affective-regulatory systems), moderating contextual conditions (institutional, instructional, and social factors), and developmental outcomes (academic, psychological, and professional). The model specifies functional relationships among components, distinguishes between initiating and sustaining mechanisms, and positions well-being as both outcome and resource. This framework provides theoretical grounding for future empirical research and offers strategic guidance for educational practice aimed at fostering sustainable engagement, student well-being, and long-term professional development.

当代高等教育面临的学术参与挑战:迈向功能整合模式。
学术参与已经成为高等教育研究的核心结构,越来越多地被定位为教育质量和长期学生成果的综合指标。尽管参与相关的出版物呈指数级增长,但该领域在理论上仍然是碎片化的,模型关注的是孤立的组成部分,而不是动机、调节、心理生理和环境因素之间的功能相互关系。本文进行了全面的理论分析,并提出了一个功能整合的学术参与模型。通过对理论传统的系统回顾——包括介入理论、动机框架、自我决定理论、社会认知方法和心理社会视角——我们综合了当前的知识并确定了关键的差距。该模型将参与定义为一种动态过程机制,将易感资源(心理、心理生理和教育)、中介过程(动机、自我调节和情感调节系统)、调节情境条件(制度、教学和社会因素)和发展结果(学术、心理和专业)联系起来。该模型明确了各组成部分之间的功能关系,区分了启动机制和维持机制,并将福祉定位为结果和资源。该框架为未来的实证研究提供了理论基础,并为旨在促进可持续参与、学生福祉和长期专业发展的教育实践提供了战略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书